We don't want "back of the fag packet" claims, says Worcester politician

Worcester's Guildhall: audit committee meeting debate

Worcester's Guildhall: audit committee meeting debate

First published in News
Last updated
Worcester News: Tom Edwards by , Political Reporter

A KEY watchdog has asked for greater clarity over Worcester City Council's finances - firing a warning over "back of the fag packet" claims.

The city's audit committee, a powerful body which probes public spending, says too many facts and figures coming out of the Guildhall are not examined closely enough.

It says many policies to come out of the council are accepted without claims from staff about the financial pros and cons of each one being scrutinised properly.

The committee, which meets around six times a year, has asked the council to give it thorough details on how any type of "modelling" is arrived at in the future.

It follows a decision back in November by the council's Labour leadership to turn its back on food waste bin collections due to the costs.

At the time, staff said it would cost £1 million to launch extra bin collections for the city's 40,000 households and around £544,000 in yearly running costs.

But details of how the city council arrived at that figure was never probed or made public.

Councillor Andy Roberts, who chairs the audit committee, said: "This committee ought to have more reassurances on how modelling is done.

"When the council works out a figure we ought to know what was put into it to get the figure, and how does it all work."

He said councillors get reports containing figures of hundreds of thousands of pounds, but the committee should make sure it isn't "back of the fag packet stuff".

His comments were taken on board by officers, who said things would change in the future.

At the time of the food waste collections being pushed aside, Worcester Green Party insisted the figures needed greater clarity.

Green Councillor Neil Laurenson said it was a "missed opportunity".

The audit committee, meanwhile, has accepted assurances the city's housing benefit and council tax transactions are on track.

Every year the data must be independently verified and for the 2012/13 financial year, out of £77 million worth of transactions, a discrepancy of £799 was flagged up by Grant Thornton.

When the amounts do not add up the Government has the power to ask councils to do an audit trail through the rest of the books to see if there are anomalies elsewhere.

During the committee meeting Lesley Meagher, corporate finance director, insisted it was "very unlikely" the council will get that request.

"It's such a small amount I don't think the DWP (Department for Work and Pensions) will do anything, they'll have bigger cases to look at," she said.

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

1:12pm Thu 13 Mar 14

Jabbadad says...

Since being in opposition Andy Roberts keeps rolling out such trivial statements while forgetting that most of the current operational practises were in place when his beloved Tories ruled. (something he is still crying into his milk about)
As to the Waste Food collection how much more information do we need than Bromsgrove District Council stopping their Waste Food Collection due to the enormous cost?
Since being in opposition Andy Roberts keeps rolling out such trivial statements while forgetting that most of the current operational practises were in place when his beloved Tories ruled. (something he is still crying into his milk about) As to the Waste Food collection how much more information do we need than Bromsgrove District Council stopping their Waste Food Collection due to the enormous cost? Jabbadad
  • Score: -2

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree