Woman fiddled £22,000 benefits over four years (From Worcester News)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting WN NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
Woman fiddled £22,000 benefits over four years
10:40am Wednesday 16th January 2013 in News By Sarah Taylor
A DROITWICH woman who fraudulently claimed more than £22,000 in benefits has been handed a suspended jail term.
Melissa Ross claimed income support, housing benefit and council tax benefit in relation to her rented property.
A joint investigation by Wychavon District Council and the Department for Work and Pensions discovered that from August 18, 2008, the 29-year-old had failed to declare she was living together with her partner at the same address.
Her partner was working while she claimed benefits. When interviewed, Ross, currently of Farriers Corner, Droitwich, admitted her partner was a regular visitor and that he stayed over on three nights a week and also at weekends.
The investigation resulted in total overpayments of £8,989.94 in income support and a total of £13,600.58 in housing benefit and council tax benefit, totalling £22,590.52.
The case was heard at Worcester Magistrates Court where Ross pleaded guilty to six charges of benefit fraud.
Sam Lamsdale, defending, said Ross was often in an on/off relationship with her partner and she thought he could stay up to three nights a week.
She said it was a case of her client burying her head in the sand and she now realised she should have reported it to the relevant agencies.
Ross was given a two-year suspended sentence of 49 weeks in custody for the six counts of benefit fraud to run concurrently, meaning she would serve 18 weeks. She was also given a two-year community service order, told to undertake 240 hours of unpaid work and must pay £100 in costs.
Ross will also have to fully repay all the benefits to which she was not entitled.
l An Evesham woman fraudulently claimed £5,170.48 in benefits after failing to tell authorities she was living with her partner.
Deborah Hanks, formerly Smith, of Mill Street, Evesham, claimed jobseeker’s allowance, housing benefit and council tax benefit as a single person in relation to a property that she rented in Common Road from 2009. But the 39-year-old hadn’t declared she was living with her partner and that they had married in June 2010.
Her husband was working while she was claiming benefits.
Hanks was given a 24-month conditional discharge at Worcester Magistrates Court and prosecutors were awarded £200 in costs. She will also have to fully repay all the benefits.
Anyone who is unsure about their benefit entitlement should call 01905 822744.
Comments(11)
More Tea Vicar
says...
10:56am Wed 16 Jan 13
We could also do with government policies aimed at boosting employment and wages. And limits to benefits entitlement, making benefits the safety net for those who need it, not a lifestyle option.
No one who genuinely needs and deserves benefits should be denied them. But no one should be able to regard the benefits system as a soft touch.
pudniw_gib
says...
11:11am Wed 16 Jan 13
Anyone who thinks living on the dole is easy should try it. People fiddle benefits mainly because they are skint. I know people who work all week and still have to claim housing benefit because the rents are so expensive, they feel bad that they cant buy new shoes for the kids without doing a few hours on the side.
Taking the mick out of the system when you are on a good wage or comfortably off is one thing but many, many people really struggle on benefits and some get caught. No idea about what really went on in these cases but I have been on the dole and it is s**t.
More Tea Vicar
says...
12:00pm Wed 16 Jan 13
As for knighting bankers, they might get knighted 'despite' fraud, but not 'for' fraud. And remember, it was Labour that knighted Fred Goodwin.
Either way, fraud is fraud and should be punished. Also, there should be caps on benefits. It is wrong that some people choose to produce large families whilst on the dole, and I suspect most of us know someone who is doing quite nicely out of a system that most of us find hard to access.
To me, the answer is high levels of employment, and a decent living wage. The idea of people working full time and still having to claim benefits is ludicrous.
Look at the salaries many employers pay the people at the top. The money is there; it should be spent where it counts.
Respectable
says...
3:01pm Wed 16 Jan 13
Glad she got busted and will be even more glad in the morning when I get out of bed at 5:30am to go to work.
Where do people get off thinking it is acceptable to do this. And then to have a pop at people who put effort into supporting themselves and their families ! Ridiculous !
More Tea Vicar
says...
5:53pm Wed 16 Jan 13
Respectable wrote:Spot on.
Another sponger thinking she's entitled to a nice easy income boost.
Glad she got busted and will be even more glad in the morning when I get out of bed at 5:30am to go to work.
Where do people get off thinking it is acceptable to do this. And then to have a pop at people who put effort into supporting themselves and their families ! Ridiculous !
It is stupid that our benefits system does not seem to provide very well for those that need it, but be open to abuse by those who don't.
Still, she got caught, which is great. I just have a feeling that for every one who gets caught, thousands may be working the system effectively, either through fraud, or through manipulation.
How can it be right that families where no one works seem to produce more kids than those which do?
Or that some asylum seekers seem to live in luxury
http://www.dailymail
.co.uk/news/article-
2025895/Housing-bene
fits-Somali-asylum-s
eeker-Saeed-Khaliifs
-family-2m-house.htm
l
Pity it was in the Mail. Checked on the BBC but for some reason, they don't seem to have reported on this one....
shirtholes52
says...
5:10am Thu 17 Jan 13
They're still getting away with it.
TDH123
says...
6:23am Thu 17 Jan 13
Respectable
says...
7:29am Thu 17 Jan 13
1. She didn't know who she had to inform... She knew well enough when she applied for the benefits...
2. An "On / Off Relationship".. For FOUR YEARS..
Get real.. She knew exactly what she was doing.
More Tea Vicar
says...
9:35am Thu 17 Jan 13
shirtholes52 wrote:Interesting contribution.
I recently informed of a couple doing exactly the same thing as this person and the reply I got back from them was: "if a person has their own address, where they are paying council tax etc., then it is almost impossible to prove that a fraud is taking place if they spend most of their nights with someone else. A fraud will only be committed if they do NOT have their own address" Totally different attitude from them.
They're still getting away with it.
The BBC was quoting levels of known benefit fraud as being very low, but I suspect this is largely because
a - some people can get more than they need just by working the system
and
b - there is insufficient emphasis placed on investigating and prosecuting it.
Even in the current case, I congratulate those involved in dealing with it, but the sentence seems remarkably lenient.
BTW, I take an equally dim view of overpaid bosses and tax evaders as I do of benefits cheats.
laughing girl
says...
1:56pm Thu 17 Jan 13
grumpy woman
says...
10:17pm Thu 17 Jan 13
Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Log in with us
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Or
Log in with