Now send in the parking wardens, say town traders (From Worcester News)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting WN NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
Now send in the parking wardens, say town traders
5:30pm Monday 21st January 2013 in News By Robert Hale
ENFORCEMENT of roadside parking time limits cannot come soon enough, say Malvern traders.
Their call came after Malvern Hills Distrct Council disclosed that since new parking charges were introduced in September, the turnover in short-stay car parks has increased.
The cost of an hour's parking was reduced from 60p to 50p in short-stay and long-stay car parks, while the cost for two hours was increased in short-stay car parks, and cut in long-stay car parks, with the aim of encouraging the use of off-street parking.
Although ticket sales have increased, income has fallen by £4,000 since the prices were revised. Half of this reduction is due to lower sales of HGV and seven-day tickets. Traders said the result was encouraging, but what is really needed is enforcement to prevent roadside spaces being taken up for long periods during the daytime.
Chris Marks of Iapetus Gallery and chairman of Great Malvern Association of Trade said: "It's encouraging people are still using the short-stay car park but the key issue in the town is parking is in the wrong place. It's too far way from the town centre. What we need is the on-street parking to be enforced, so that there is a high turnover, and people can come into the town to shop."
David Siviter of jewellers Parrys said car parking charges need to be kept as reasonable as possible, and on-street parking time limits should be enforced. He said: “That would help by moving cars on and freeing spaces for more people to come into town. At the moment, people know they can ignore the time limits and nothing will happen. The sooner it comes in, the better.”
But not everyone agrees. Adrian Ward of Robson Ward Kitchens, also a town councillor, says parking enforcement by the district council is not the answer.
"The council will have to justify the costs of employing the warden, so there will be pressure for him to get in as much revenue as possible. People will be getting tickets when they're just a few minutes over, and it's put them off coming to Malvern. That's what's happened elsewhere.
"I don't object to enforcing on-street parking restrictions, but it should be done by the police, who are not revenue-driven.
He said the answer was to enlarge the existing car park behind Belle Vue Terrace. He said: "It's already a good little car park and it does very well. It should be enlarged, instead of the council trying to get people to park in the Priory Road and walk up the hill, which they won't do."
Comments(8)
Lew Smoralz
says...
1:03am Tue 22 Jan 13
Why not provide free off-street car parking and watch the customers flood into Malvern. Just a thought...
CJH
says...
1:28am Tue 22 Jan 13
Lew Smoralz wrote:Good luck finding off street parking in Malvern that's anywhere near anything you might want to visit. Free or not, it's just not practical. And of course, being Malvern it's all uphill down there...
How about a bit of "thinking outside the box"? Why not provide free off-street car parking and watch the customers flood into Malvern. Just a thought...
Andy-Apache
says...
8:41am Tue 22 Jan 13
CJH
says...
10:30am Tue 22 Jan 13
Andy-Apache wrote:And when Waitrose and Splash's carparks are full of cars whose owners are not buying at Waitrose or swimming at Splash what do you think will happen then? If I had a business with a carpark and my own customers couldn't get into it I would not be a happy bunny! I would certainly stop non-customers parking there.
So, Waitrose carpark - too far from shops? I estimate 300 yards. Splash - 400 yards, very slightly uphill. I'm not exactly svelte, but walking from Waitrose to town is hardly ascending Everest! Even if you want to go to the top of town, there's steps from Waitrose carpark, and that climb might just burn up a few calories.
Karl Hunderson
says...
10:58am Tue 22 Jan 13
CJH wrote:The Splash does not have its own car park. The Priory road car par oppopsite the Splash is a public car park for use by anyone. Waitrose, quite rightly, take the view that the more people are encouraged to come to Great Malvern by the availability of parking, the better it will be for their business. Hence the reason why they allow residents' parking permits to be valid in their car park and also, quite often, have the barriers up so that parking is free. To be honest I have more problems getting a parking space in the retail park than in Great Malvern.
Andy-Apache wrote:And when Waitrose and Splash's carparks are full of cars whose owners are not buying at Waitrose or swimming at Splash what do you think will happen then? If I had a business with a carpark and my own customers couldn't get into it I would not be a happy bunny! I would certainly stop non-customers parking there.
So, Waitrose carpark - too far from shops? I estimate 300 yards. Splash - 400 yards, very slightly uphill. I'm not exactly svelte, but walking from Waitrose to town is hardly ascending Everest! Even if you want to go to the top of town, there's steps from Waitrose carpark, and that climb might just burn up a few calories.
Andy-Apache
says...
11:36am Tue 22 Jan 13
MakeUthink
says...
11:13pm Tue 22 Jan 13
Samboy says...
10:18pm Mon 21 Jan 13