Rail bridge repairs nearing the end

REPAIRS: Worcester Foregate Street Bridge. REPAIRS: Worcester Foregate Street Bridge.

WORK to spruce up a historic city centre railway bridge should finally end this month – five months later than planned.

Repairs at the Worcester Foregate Street Bridge took longer than expected because the structure was so badly corroded. The £1.1m scheme by Network Rail was due to finish on August 31 last year but workmen found more corrosion than expected and a new timetable for the work had to be drawn up.

The work is due to be completed by the end of January followed by a phased withdrawal from the site when the scaffolding will be removed. Once the work on the bridge itself is completed a separate, £785,000 revamp of Worcester Foregate Street railway station can begin. This work by Worcestershire County Council includes the replacement of the existing 1970s canopies, automatic doors at both entrances, better cycle storage facilities, new customer service screens and a fresh coat of paint.

Network Rail project manager Jim Melling said: “The grade two listed structure at Foregate Street requires extensive work to return it to its former glory.

“We wish to restore its structural integrity and to reduce the need for further maintenance or refurbishment works to be undertaken in the near future.

“The benefit to Worcester of this work being completed is that the listed bridge will maintain its structural integrity for many years to come as we seek to preserve a great landmark for the city of Worcester.”

The company began work in June to remove paintwork and expose the metal underneath prior to repainting.

It was later found that additional work would be necessary to repair and replace steelwork sections which have suffered extensive corrosion.

Network Rail is also taking the opportunity to renew the bridge’s drainage and guttering systems and bond together fractures identified at previous inspections.

Mr Melling added: “Upon completion of the grit-blasting activities, it emerged that the corrosion of the structure was considerably more widespread than had been considered in the original inspection report.”

Jon Fraser, Worcestershire County Council's customer and community manager said: "We are working with Network Rail and continue to monitor the situation regarding their project being undertaken by contractors Murphy's. The priority is to ensure the safety of workers and rail users and our refurbishment project cannot start until this previous work is completed. However at this stage we do not expect any change to work starting in the Spring."

Plans to improve the station were approved by Worcester City Council’s planning committee last October despite councillors calling the scheme ‘dull, bland and uninspiring’.

Comments(5)

Maggie Would says...
9:33am Wed 23 Jan 13

'Jon Fraser, Worcestershire County Council's customer and community manager'
Wasn't he in Highways?

catcostume says...
10:24am Wed 23 Jan 13

Sounds great, I look forward to seeing the refurbished station.

Arthur Blenkinsop says...
10:35am Wed 23 Jan 13

Now, i know this may sound stupid, but if the bridge was properly surveyed before the work started, then surely a structural engineer with the right equipment and worth his pay would have picked up on the 'considerable' and 'widespread' corrosion prior to any work starting?
Having said that, I hope it does look better, and that it will last for years to come.

one94 says...
12:59pm Wed 23 Jan 13

about time. Looking forward to seeing the covers come off. wonder if it'll be gold to match the hive??

Maggie Would says...
3:33pm Wed 23 Jan 13

Arthur Blenkinsop wrote:
Now, i know this may sound stupid, but if the bridge was properly surveyed before the work started, then surely a structural engineer with the right equipment and worth his pay would have picked up on the 'considerable' and 'widespread' corrosion prior to any work starting?
Having said that, I hope it does look better, and that it will last for years to come.
Not necessarily, Arthur, to be fair. Proper safe access most likely wasn't possible until the work started and the steelwork in question will have been covered in several layers of paint and decades of dirt.
However, a bridge engineer worth his salt should have considered the likelihood of more extensive work being required when the work was uncovered and calculated the risk of this eventuality. We don't know whether he did this, so we're not in a position to criticise.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree