‘Think again’ on plan for freezing tax (From Worcester News)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting WN NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
‘Think again’ on plan for freezing tax
5:50pm Wednesday 30th January 2013 in News By Tom Edwards
COUNCIL chiefs in Worcester are being asked to “think again” about proposals to freeze tax at a time when millions of extra pounds are needed to pay towards a new swimming pool.
Councillor Richard Boorn, the Labour group’s finance spokesman, said he believes the path the ruling Conservative administration is following at the city council is “irresponsible”.
As your Worcester News revealed last month, bosses want to freeze council tax for an unprecedented third year in a row this April to help households.
But the authority is also looking at building a £13 million swimming pool next to the existing Perdiswell Leisure Centre.
As a consequence the council’s authorised debt limit is expected to increase from £15.5 million to £30.5 million by 2015/16, although it is very unlikely the entire project will need to be financed that way.
In February, the council will take a crunch vote on whether or not to freeze the council tax rate in return for accepting a cash lump sum of about £50,000 from the Government.
Because the Guildhall only takes 11 per cent of the overall household bill, a rise of two per cent would cost taxpayers just £3.36 a year for an average band D property, 28p per month, and bring in £100,000.
Coun Boorn said: “The way it is structured, our borrowing ratio will go from six per cent to around 20 per cent if this goes through.
“Why the council thinks it can do this with the public’s money is beyond me. If you look at the position, it does not strike me as good stewardship. The kind of rise we’ve talked about would mean £2 or £3 a year, so it’s irresponsible not to look at it.
“At the moment they are looking at putting us into more and more debt, I don’t believe it’s right.”
The Conservatives have consistently refuted criticism of the move, with leader Coun Simon Geraghty insisting they have not decided how the proposed pool will be funded yet.
He has also said that an increase in council tax of two per cent would mean the Government withdrawing its cash bonus, which would leave Worcester only £50,000 better off overall.
Coun Andy Roberts, the finance spokesman, says a freeze is “a pledge” made to hard-pressed households.
The new pool, if approved, will be open in early 2016, with the current facility at Perdiswell then set to be demolished.
Comments(7)
Captain Thrap
says...
6:53pm Wed 30 Jan 13
Why not ask the Uni to pay for the swimming pool, would make up for all the business-venture student tenements in our neighbourhoods that don't pay any coucil tax
TDH123
says...
6:40am Thu 31 Jan 13
In these times of austerity should we not perhaps place the plans for a swimming pool on the back-burner and instead permit swimming in the Diglis Basin?
Hwicce
says...
12:11pm Thu 31 Jan 13
Got to be a money spinner, unless the anglers think you are scaring the fish and have you shot.
Landy44
says...
1:39pm Thu 31 Jan 13
The article last week about the ridiculous funding of the new swimming pool....Then this!!!!!
Coun Born sounds like an unusually sensible fellow give his political bias and role. I'd love to know what he thinks of the mess Labour created over the last decade, but in this instance - Good for him.
There has to come a point of drawing the line under this legalised theft.
induby
says...
1:59pm Thu 31 Jan 13
Jabbadad
says...
1:42am Fri 1 Feb 13
Our planners (ha ha) need to think ahead out of the box, firstly if feasible, don't pull down the old sports centre but design an overall scheme which can incorporate a revamped sports Centre, and to design the 25 metres pool that with forward planning design could well be extended to 50 Metres when, if, further funding was ever available. Sound futuristic planning now, could provide a much larger and Olympic size training pool complex, later on.
However I dream that our planners / Councillors listen or have any pro-active ideas, and when we see historically that we have what we have, and we really know that they don't.
An blatant example of crass planning was the New Hospital, the original design akin to spokes in a wheel from a central hub, was exciting since it was forward thinking that should there be a need for extensions the services and buildings could easily and cost effectively be extended, (Bolted on as it were) however the then the powers to be sold the close proximity land / Office blocks, and technically the Hospital became landlocked apart from more land coming from Spetchley Estates, but not within the original forward thinking Hospital design capabilities.
So Planners and Oozlum Bird politicians were a bane to Society then and now it seems. We had plenty of incapable's then, and we now seem to have sons and daughters of the incapable's now.
DarrenM says...
5:55pm Wed 30 Jan 13