‘Think again’ on plan for freezing tax

COUNCIL chiefs in Worcester are being asked to “think again” about proposals to freeze tax at a time when millions of extra pounds are needed to pay towards a new swimming pool.

Councillor Richard Boorn, the Labour group’s finance spokesman, said he believes the path the ruling Conservative administration is following at the city council is “irresponsible”.

As your Worcester News revealed last month, bosses want to freeze council tax for an unprecedented third year in a row this April to help households.

But the authority is also looking at building a £13 million swimming pool next to the existing Perdiswell Leisure Centre.

As a consequence the council’s authorised debt limit is expected to increase from £15.5 million to £30.5 million by 2015/16, although it is very unlikely the entire project will need to be financed that way.

In February, the council will take a crunch vote on whether or not to freeze the council tax rate in return for accepting a cash lump sum of about £50,000 from the Government.

Because the Guildhall only takes 11 per cent of the overall household bill, a rise of two per cent would cost taxpayers just £3.36 a year for an average band D property, 28p per month, and bring in £100,000.

Coun Boorn said: “The way it is structured, our borrowing ratio will go from six per cent to around 20 per cent if this goes through.

“Why the council thinks it can do this with the public’s money is beyond me. If you look at the position, it does not strike me as good stewardship. The kind of rise we’ve talked about would mean £2 or £3 a year, so it’s irresponsible not to look at it.

“At the moment they are looking at putting us into more and more debt, I don’t believe it’s right.”

The Conservatives have consistently refuted criticism of the move, with leader Coun Simon Geraghty insisting they have not decided how the proposed pool will be funded yet.

He has also said that an increase in council tax of two per cent would mean the Government withdrawing its cash bonus, which would leave Worcester only £50,000 better off overall.

Coun Andy Roberts, the finance spokesman, says a freeze is “a pledge” made to hard-pressed households.

The new pool, if approved, will be open in early 2016, with the current facility at Perdiswell then set to be demolished.

Comments(7)

DarrenM says...
5:55pm Wed 30 Jan 13

Good old Labour - Tax and Spend, all well creating a few non-jobs as well - No doubt Cllr Boorn's ideal plan will be to have twice as many Managers as actual staff at the new pool, all on 50k a year

Captain Thrap says...
6:53pm Wed 30 Jan 13

Yes and a tier of duputies beneath them too LOL

Why not ask the Uni to pay for the swimming pool, would make up for all the business-venture student tenements in our neighbourhoods that don't pay any coucil tax

TDH123 says...
6:40am Thu 31 Jan 13

We should be encouraging students in Worcester "Captain Thrap".
In these times of austerity should we not perhaps place the plans for a swimming pool on the back-burner and instead permit swimming in the Diglis Basin?

Hwicce says...
12:11pm Thu 31 Jan 13

If we did swimming in Diglis basin we could advertise "Swim with a seal" sessions.

Got to be a money spinner, unless the anglers think you are scaring the fish and have you shot.

Landy44 says...
1:39pm Thu 31 Jan 13

OMG - I don't know whether to laugh or cry!

The article last week about the ridiculous funding of the new swimming pool....Then this!!!!!

Coun Born sounds like an unusually sensible fellow give his political bias and role. I'd love to know what he thinks of the mess Labour created over the last decade, but in this instance - Good for him.

There has to come a point of drawing the line under this legalised theft.

induby says...
1:59pm Thu 31 Jan 13

what I find puzzling at this time of such austerity is not only are they considering paying 13 million for a new pool, but with its running costs,staff and the fact that people cant afford to go swimming, how quickly are they expecting this project to actually break even or better still actually make a profit!, its so frustrating! but then i find this endemic of the whole government at the moment, spending a fortune on completely inappropriate non essential crap, whilst making more and more people live in poverty,

Jabbadad says...
1:42am Fri 1 Feb 13

Similar comments against a new swimming baths were being aired when Parks swimming baths was to be replaced, and against a swell of public opinions which were even then suggesting Perdiswell, the local powers-to-be cocked a deaf-one and built on the same site, while when we looked a little further away Malvern built a new community pool,The Splash which has been a huge success attracting thousands from Worcester ignoring the Sansome Walk swimming baths. So here we are some years later and many £Millions poorer, considering a new 25 Metres pool at Perdiswell, and pulling the Old Sports Centre down.
Our planners (ha ha) need to think ahead out of the box, firstly if feasible, don't pull down the old sports centre but design an overall scheme which can incorporate a revamped sports Centre, and to design the 25 metres pool that with forward planning design could well be extended to 50 Metres when, if, further funding was ever available. Sound futuristic planning now, could provide a much larger and Olympic size training pool complex, later on.
However I dream that our planners / Councillors listen or have any pro-active ideas, and when we see historically that we have what we have, and we really know that they don't.
An blatant example of crass planning was the New Hospital, the original design akin to spokes in a wheel from a central hub, was exciting since it was forward thinking that should there be a need for extensions the services and buildings could easily and cost effectively be extended, (Bolted on as it were) however the then the powers to be sold the close proximity land / Office blocks, and technically the Hospital became landlocked apart from more land coming from Spetchley Estates, but not within the original forward thinking Hospital design capabilities.
So Planners and Oozlum Bird politicians were a bane to Society then and now it seems. We had plenty of incapable's then, and we now seem to have sons and daughters of the incapable's now.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree