Cash crisis could lead to city sports centres being hived off

CUTS are being made to council-run sports centres in Worcester in a bid to save £128,000 by 2015.

City council chiefs want to hand over the running of St John’s Sports Centre and Nunnery Wood Sports Complex to a new operator from April – which is almost certain to be a trust.

Trusts benefit from lower VAT charges and rates, with bosses hoping the move will secure the long-term future of both sites. Of the four council-owned sites in Worcester, two of them – Perdiswell Leisure Centre and Worcester Swimming Pool and Fitness Centre – are run by Leisure Connection.

Council chiefs say if an established trust comes in to run the two other facilities which remain in-house, they will benefit from “economies of scale” [factors causing costs to fall while volume of output increases] in areas such as marketing and IT. At the moment, the city council spends about £1.3 million a year on sports centres but only receives £1 million in income, leaving a net budget spend of around £300,000.

Councillor Jabba Riaz, cabinet member for safer and stronger communities, said: “From a city perspective, the debate has been about whether we can keep them in-house or hand them to a trust. We need to make sure the centres are preserved and that is what this is about. The key thing for me is making sure we benefit from the Olympic legacy – we are looking for the best operator to take them on.”

The city council is hoping any deal with a trust means the impact on front line services for customers will be minimal. There are no suggestions at this point that prices will be increased.

The handover was also debated during a meeting of the performance management and budget scrutiny committee (PMBS) at the Guildhall.

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:51am Thu 7 Feb 13

More Tea Vicar says...

I can understand the thinking behind this to a certain extent, but it looks a bit odd in the context of plans to spend £13 million on a new swimming pool.
I can understand the thinking behind this to a certain extent, but it looks a bit odd in the context of plans to spend £13 million on a new swimming pool. More Tea Vicar
  • Score: 0

11:19am Thu 7 Feb 13

Jabbadad says...

It's not the council staff that needs chopping but surely more efficient savings could be made by ridding this City and County of some of it's useless politicians, who just turn up at meetings (sometimes) for the attendance allowances, and sit there and not utter a word during meetings.
DANGER DEMOCRACY MIGHT BE AT WORK.
It's not the council staff that needs chopping but surely more efficient savings could be made by ridding this City and County of some of it's useless politicians, who just turn up at meetings (sometimes) for the attendance allowances, and sit there and not utter a word during meetings. DANGER DEMOCRACY MIGHT BE AT WORK. Jabbadad
  • Score: 0

2:23pm Thu 7 Feb 13

More Tea Vicar says...

Jabbadad wrote:
It's not the council staff that needs chopping but surely more efficient savings could be made by ridding this City and County of some of it's useless politicians, who just turn up at meetings (sometimes) for the attendance allowances, and sit there and not utter a word during meetings.
DANGER DEMOCRACY MIGHT BE AT WORK.
There is nothing wrong with change, when it makes sense.

But sometimes, the best thing to do is just decide whether something is worth doing or not. If so, then just do it; by all means look to do it as efficiently as possible. But just accept that it has to be done, and live with the cost, and make savings elsewhere.

Looking at the Council's record, they have wasted so much money on ill-thought-through road schemes, unjustifiable senior manager salaries, consultants to tell them things which are obvious.

It is clear that there is a lot of waste,. Cutting that would be way better than yet more re-organisation for re-organisation's sake.
[quote][p][bold]Jabbadad[/bold] wrote: It's not the council staff that needs chopping but surely more efficient savings could be made by ridding this City and County of some of it's useless politicians, who just turn up at meetings (sometimes) for the attendance allowances, and sit there and not utter a word during meetings. DANGER DEMOCRACY MIGHT BE AT WORK.[/p][/quote]There is nothing wrong with change, when it makes sense. But sometimes, the best thing to do is just decide whether something is worth doing or not. If so, then just do it; by all means look to do it as efficiently as possible. But just accept that it has to be done, and live with the cost, and make savings elsewhere. Looking at the Council's record, they have wasted so much money on ill-thought-through road schemes, unjustifiable senior manager salaries, consultants to tell them things which are obvious. It is clear that there is a lot of waste,. Cutting that would be way better than yet more re-organisation for re-organisation's sake. More Tea Vicar
  • Score: 0
Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree