Crackdown on student digs is bad for our city (From Worcester News)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting WN NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
Crackdown on student digs is bad for our city
6:20pm Friday 15th February 2013 in News By Tom Edwards
Crackdown on student digs is bad for our city
A LANDLORD has delivered a withering attack on Worcester’s student homes crackdown – saying it is unfair on young people and will damage the city’s reputation.
The critic, who has asked to remain anonymous, owns 10 properties in the city and is a member of the National Landlords Association.
He told your Worcester News:
It will damage Worcester’s economy and keep house prices down.
It is “an attack on students” and sends out the wrong message to prospective university students.
It could slow down future housing development and encourage rogue landlords.
From next year the city council is to clamp down on the number of houses in multiple occupation (HMOs).
It means landlords who want to turn a house into student accommodation or rent it to three or more tenants will have to apply for a ‘change of use’ first.
The change, approved by the city council’s ruling cabinet earlier this week, already had the backing of the planning committee, which insists it needs to protect the character of neighbourhoods at risk of being damaged by rows of student properties.
The landlord said: “There is a widely unchallenged perception about students, when in fact they are far less likely to get involved in crime than you or me.
“The planners want control over the city and my view is that it will be massively detrimental on Worcester as a whole.
“The number of students in Worcester is only going to increase – this is a timebomb. In my view, it will mean good landlords giving up and it will go underground.”
The city council says the move is “not an attack on students or the university”, but that it wants to avoid unwanted HMOs springing up.
Paul O’Connor, head of planning, said: “The council has high regard for the university and its students. It is a success story in recent years and we work hard with the university to promote its development. We also recognise that today’s student is tomorrow’s entrepreneur or public servant – they are important members of our community and add vibrancy to our city.”
Comments(18)
goodygoody
says...
7:57pm Fri 15 Feb 13
padlock4200
says...
1:48am Sat 16 Feb 13
Not all students are bad and you'll find that a lot of them want a quiet lifestyle - like you do.
Yes, we go out and party in town... But I'm sure that you like to have a good time too and students living next door to you respect that.
It is unfair to slate students and cut down on the number of HMO's. If the City Council want to regulate the number of HMO's in the City - put in a process where you can monitor any ones that don't match up to the legal standard.
Shame on Worcester and it's residents - you'll thank the University when there are more jobs and shops on the high street because more money is being pumped into the local economy!!
Saturn V
says...
3:32am Sat 16 Feb 13
Of course not.
"Shame on Worcester and it's residents."
But Worcester and it's residents are?
Frenchierat
says...
11:10am Sat 16 Feb 13
I would guess that the landlord that made the comments in the article doesn't get woken at 3.30 in the morning by a young man (who lives in student acc opposite to my house) howling like a banshee as he cant get into his house. Well I was woken up as were a number of my neighbours (and this is not the first time such things have happened) and it is not particularly funny. Perhaps I could have the phone numbers of local landlords and call them whenever I am woken by their tenants, see if they like it.
padlock4200
says...
2:27pm Sat 16 Feb 13
Doesn't everyone like going out for a drink at some point?? The fact it's 'young people/students' makes everyone's back flare up. And the City Council say "they are important members of our community and add vibrancy to our city"... So I think people need to stop pointing out the drink 'problem' and look at if you don't control where students live in the city when it comes to HMO's - you can't control where they live, thus causing more nuisance to the local neighbourhood. As the landlord in the article says - the number of students will only increase in this city and that means they have to live somewhere. If you have a spare room, why not give it up to a student and help to curb the 'problems'?? Your house, your rules... And there is a shortage of housing in Worcester for students so it works two ways!!
padlock4200
says...
2:31pm Sat 16 Feb 13
M@lvernite
says...
2:54pm Sat 16 Feb 13
It may be worth remembering it isn't only students who live in HMOs, but also workers on low wages; not everybody has the option of living with their parents until they can afford to buy their own house.
catcostume
says...
3:27pm Sat 16 Feb 13
Doogie 46
says...
4:52pm Sat 16 Feb 13
My two sons were both students in the early nineties and collecting one at Easter I discoverd a council litter bin on the balcony of his top floor flat - he and his flatmates were a lovely bunch of lads but could misbehave at times.
I guess if you want the university you have to take the students, warts and all.
goodygoody
says...
10:10pm Sat 16 Feb 13
catcostume
says...
3:22pm Sun 17 Feb 13
Franglaise
says...
4:22pm Sun 17 Feb 13
The answer is 42
says...
5:27pm Sun 17 Feb 13
Even relatively sensible students will annoy the average home owner next door.
The council's action is 100% sensible, the anonymous landlord's entirely predictable and not newsworthy
205man
says...
7:17pm Sun 17 Feb 13
I've lived in my house in Henwick road now for almost 9 years but the past 18months have been hell since the house next door was sold and converted to student rooms, and the university are not interested when you complain. their response was I should go talk to the students about the noise etc.
which is a waste of time because when I did they said if I don't like it then I should move house???
it's not hard to see why the landlord isn't happy with the idea of change in the rules, but then I'm sure he is living miles away from the people he makes money from.
Robot 3021
says...
9:23am Mon 18 Feb 13
And the number of students isn't "only going to increase", far from it. I suggest this landlord may want to look at what effect the new fee regime is having on student numbers country-wide, and Worcester is just the same.
As for student noise - yes, most people like a drink now and again, the difference is we are aware of our neighbours on our return, and respect their right to not be disturbed at that time. A lot of us have been students, so know what student life is like, but even then we wouldn't have considered a party in our garden at 2am as acceptable.
There is an amount of give and take, and we don't expect silence, but students have to understand that they aren't in halls of residence, they are in a residential area, where they may be neighboured by young children, the elderly, or people working shifts. Not everyone can just move somewhere else, nor should they have to.
And that is the problem - in a year's time, the students will be moving somewhere else, so there is no incentive to change their behaviour. It's not their problem. Except of course it will be in five year's time, when they are working in full-time jobs (if they are lucky), and living next to the next batch of students.
I've lived next door to bad student neighbours and good student neighbours (and in my new street, the "problem" house isn't student accommodation) so this isn't all students or just students by any means, but one bad experience certainly colours your view a great deal.
kateamuffin
says...
3:50pm Mon 18 Feb 13
He owns 10 properties, lucky him!! I bet he does not live next to students.
Admittedly not all students are the same, so there are some good & bad like anyone you meet in life.
Living in St Johns next to a property with 5 students all girls is no easy life.
What are people expected to do?
Do you move house? Is your property worth less? Will the next bunch that move in be quieter & more respectful? Or will the current students stay on for a second year?
HMO’s is only a positive thing in my eyes.
Any influx of visitors, students etc is good for the city but only if it is controlled.
Housing estates are being bombarded with student houses & parking issues.
Something needs to be done.
If the anonymous landlord likes he could come & live in our house for a week or two.
See how he likes the screaming, banging, loud music, taxi’s running for minutes on end.
I am not saying they are bad people just extremely disrespectful.
205man
says...
9:59pm Mon 18 Feb 13
bmoc55 says...
6:58pm Fri 15 Feb 13
Bet he doesn't live next door to them.