Town facelift 'will bring £400,000 worth of misery' (From Worcester News)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting WN NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
Town facelift 'will bring £400,000 worth of misery'
1:50pm Monday 18th February 2013 in News By Tarik Al Rasheed
A BUSINESSMAN believes a £400,000 makeover of Upton-upon-Severn town centre will bring nothing but “misery and disruption”.
After its start was delayed by the recent snow, Worcestershire County Council has now begun work to improve road surfaces, pavements and crossing points in High Street, Lower High Street and Old Street.
It says this will boost the local economy by making the town centre safer and more attractive for residents and visitors alike.
But Peter Lynch Williams, director of air charter supply business Flaps International, based in Tunnel Hill, has slammed the scheme, describing it as “the sack of Upton”. He said road closures and disruptions in the coming weeks would be “calamitous” and questioned whether “beleaguered citizens of Upton” would see any benefits.
“Have these people no concept of the real financial difficulties facing businesses in the town, many of whom stand at the very cliff edge of calamity?” he said.
“While as residents we are only too pleased to accept government largesse in the form of the new and excellent flood barrier, who in their right mind thought it would be a good idea to once more assume the role of ‘business prevention czar’?”
Mr Lynch Williams said he did not believe there had been adequate public consultation and that time and money would have been better spent raising the flood-prone Hanley Road and imposing a 7.5-tonne weight limit on the main street through the town.
But a county council spokesman said the scheme was only agreed after detailed discussions with traders, the town council and Upton Tourism and Trade Association (UTTA).
“Plans for the final scheme, which included several changes identified by these key groups, were available to view at the town hall and library from July 11 to August 24 and comments invited. The scheme was modified further, where appropriate, to reflect the views of local people,” he said.
Traders had been consulted on when best to carry out the work and that great care had been taken to limit any full closures of the High Street to Sundays only.
“This investment in the area is being made to enhance the local economy, improve safety and open up access to the town centre as well as generally improving the environment,” he said. Annette Keyworth, chairman of UTTA, said the project was very welcome and would be a “real asset” for the town.
Comments(5)
Redhillman
says...
2:55pm Mon 18 Feb 13
RobertR
says...
8:59am Tue 19 Feb 13
The High street is a terrible mess with wonky bollards, huge gaps in the badly laid block paving, a trip hazard, a haven for fag ends ,and the dangerous pedestrian crossing at Broad Street junction. We had months of disruption for a very poor job. If it had been on my property I would refused to pay for it. Evesham's High street looks much better.
TioTio
says...
11:38am Tue 19 Feb 13
And as for UTC and public consultation...this is probably one of those rare occasions you will see those two words in the same sentence!
I'm afraid recent decision-making in the town has left a lot to be desired. Bridge-painting, leasing car parks, new housing developments, etc. The list is endless. More worryingly however is the fact that they are now taking decisions that will have a severe and detrimental impact on the town for a very long time to come.
UTC are consistently failing the residents of Upton. This needs to stop. The starting point will hopefully be this Thursday's Extraordinary Meeting they have called, albeit belatedly, to address the groundswell of opposition to the housing/planning policies they seem hell-bent on imposing without due consideration, process or consultation.
Horatio One
says...
6:35pm Tue 19 Feb 13
Landy44 says...
2:13pm Mon 18 Feb 13
It is already disruptive in the town and the progress appears to be quite slow so far.
Frankly, in the current climate that £400,000 would have been better not spent at all, but unfortunately all layers of government seem hell bent on bankrupting us!