Fears that hated tower will remain (From Worcester News)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting WN NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
Fears that hated tower will remain
4:50pm Thursday 28th February 2013 in News
EYESORE: Planners are taking steps which will mean buildings like Elgar House cannot be used for housing.
A building which has been branded a blight and an eyesore could survive under new planning rules.
New laws will soon mean that commercial sites in Worcester can be turned into homes or flats with exemptions granted only in exceptional circumstances.
But Worcester City Council wants commercial areas like those in Warndon and parts of Shrub Hill protected from being used for housing under permitted development rights which come into force in spring.
At a meeting of the city’s planning committee councillors expressed concern that if parts of Shrub Hill were turned into housing it could reduce opportunities for long-term redevelopment. Councillor Derek Prodger was concerned that the “wretched” seven-storey office block, Elgar House, near Shrub Hill railway station, could survive unless the area was given an exemption.
“It is the most hated building by the residents around the location. Here we are discussing how to keep it. The debate should be whether we remove it.
“It’s an absolute blight on the landscape. If it goes to residential now we don’t have the option of demolition.”
Paul O’Connor, development services manager, said the objective was to be rid of the building as part of a comprehensive redevelopment of the Shrub Hill area. “If we have a situation whereby it could be converted under permitted development from office to residential that means it perpetuates the life of the building and the chance for demolition goes.”
Warndon is also a key commercial area for the city which planning leaders want to be exempt because of sites like the Shire Business Park and firms like Worcester Bosch, Yamazuki Mazak, Npower, CyroService and the Royal Mail. This area supports 2,100 jobs – a third of the employment in the higher end sectors of business, administration and professional, scientific and technical services in Worcester.
Coun Andy Roberts, who represents Warndon Parish South, said such companies had made a big difference in Worcester.
“I really do welcome this, that we recognise that our wealth depends on that area of the city and we need to give it all the protection we can.”
The proposed exemption area would not cover the whole of the business parks and employment in this part of the city.
Worcester City Council’s submissions for exemption were handed in before the deadline on Friday, February 22.
Comments(9)
gmoore1207
says...
5:47pm Thu 28 Feb 13
Mr Nathan Goodwill
says...
6:00pm Thu 28 Feb 13
JaxiB66
says...
6:23pm Thu 28 Feb 13
Also, talking of 70's monstrosoties, what about the horrible old Co-Op building in town, and the ugly tech, wish we could just magic those away, lol!
goodygoody
says...
8:30pm Thu 28 Feb 13
CYNIC_AL
says...
8:54pm Thu 28 Feb 13
katiekins
says...
9:34pm Thu 28 Feb 13
CYNIC_AL wrote:If we getting rid of eye sores get rid of the hive as well.............
Maybe the University could buy it and clad it in gold tiles like The Hive and the new basketball arena in Hylton Road...
Jabbadad
says...
12:45am Fri 1 Mar 13
Landy44
says...
8:28am Fri 1 Mar 13
Jabbadad wrote:WOW! They spent £1million on refurbishing Shrub Hill Station? What on earth did they do with the money?
It isn't too long ago that over £1million pounds was spent refurbishing Shrub Hill Station and during the proposals the conservationists were insisting on spending huge sums of money on blank window arches while still leaving us with a Station that you have to lug your cases over a footbridge, weeds still growing in between the rails and NO TOILETS. But a very pleasant Cafe.
It still looks a complete mess itself, never mind the eyesore that is Elgar House (which should be demolished).
I'm all for knocking it down and starting over in that area provided no one has to borrow money to do it! To be stuck with that building any longer, and the state of the station would be a crime, but to go further into debt to change it would be a greater crime.
Surely the station is privately owned following the privatisation of the railways????
gmoore1207 says...
5:45pm Thu 28 Feb 13