No stone will be left unturned in Worcester swimming pool mission, vows council (From Worcester News)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting WN NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
City council cabinet agrees to back swimming pool cash hunt
10:14am Wednesday 13th March 2013 in News By Tom Edwards
Swimming pool plans move a step closer
THE deputy leader of Worcester City Council has vowed to “leave no stone unturned” in the hunt for outside help to make a £13.5 million swimming pool a reality.
During a passionate debate at the Guildhall last night, Councillor Marc Bayliss said the decision over what standard pool to create was one of the most vital decisions in a generation.
He likened it to the creation of the South Worcestershire Development Plan (SWDP) and the transfer of council properties to Worcester Community Housing in terms of importance.
The boss of Worcester Swimming Club also took part in the meeting, and said the city would remain “stuck in the 1970s” until the Sansome Walk pool is replaced.
Following a unanimous vote, the Conservative cabinet agreed:
- To confirm the site of Perdiswell Leisure Centre for the new pool
- That the £13.5 million option, known as option one, will be the preferred one
- That it will be run by an outside operator for a peppercorn rent
- To allocate £10.5 million towards the scheme, and start the hunt for the remaining cash needed
- That option two, the £10.7 million pool, be the “minimum specification” in the case of no more funding being found
Neil Monkhouse, of Worcester Swimming Club, said: “From a swimming club point of view an eight-lane pool is very important - it would seem nonsensical to build one smaller than one created in the 1970s.
“I hope the council will have the resolve, ambition and foresight to build a pool for this city’s future, and not leave us stuck in the 1970s, which is where we are.”
During the meeting Coun Jabba Riaz, the cabinet member for safer and stronger communities, said a £13.5 million pool was the “desired option” but that nobody should “assume” other potential funding sources were available.
“At the moment, in street terms, it’s a case of keeping it real,” he said.
Coun Marc Bayliss, deputy leader and cabinet member for economic prosperity, said: “This is one of the most important decisions we’ve ever had to make, it ranks alongside the SWDP and the transfer of housing stock in terms of importance.
“We’ve identified the maximum amount which can be borrowed prudently and there is a gap between our ambition, and our ‘funding envelope’.
“There is a strong level of support for a new pool in Worcester and this is an important milestone.
“I am pleased with the recommendations and officers will leave no stone unturned to try to bridge that gap.”
He said he did not want to hear the phrase "white elephant" being used again, making reference to recent remarks from opposition Labour politicians.
"All the evidence points to strong support for this," he added.
Coun Adrian Gregson, Labour group leader, who was also at the meeting, responded by making fresh calls for a new consultation.
"Let's pause and make sure this is absolutely something we want to do," he said, reiterating that the city "does not want to end up with a white elephant".
Coun Simon Geraghty, the leader, responded by saying: "I'm convinced that going backwards at this stage is not the right thing to do."
It will now go to full council for a vote on Tuesday, March 26, and if backed will allow officers to kick-start the hunt for outside help.
In recent weeks calls have been made for the University of Worcester, Worcestershire County Council and even NHS to contribute towards it.
Under the plan, the existing pool at Sansone Walk would be demolished and the land sold off, adding £500,000 to the funding pot.
The existing leisure centre at Perdiswell would also be knocked down, with the new facility built on land on the same site.
An opening target has been set for early in 2016, but no other facilities will close until the new centre is open.
The £13.5 million pool would come with an eight-lane, 25 metre pool fit to host regional competitions, but a £10.7 million pool would only come with six lanes.
At the moment, competitive swimmers need to travel to Wolverhampton or Gloucester because Worcester's facilities are not good enough.
Both options require prudential borrowing, of £7-£10 million, which would be paid back over 40 years at a four per cent interest rate.
Option two has a £192,000 funding gap, with an independent consultant's report suggesting it is "very nearly affordable", while option one is not unless £5.2 million can be found from other sources.
Comments(25)
knick-knack
says...
3:50pm Wed 13 Mar 13
CJH wrote:CJH, I'd take it further than that. The people of Worcester only need a 6 lane pool an we will be paying that debt back for 40 years!
How many members does Worcester Swimming Club have? They say they 'must' have a new competition size pool. Leaving aside the general public's use of it, how much per member will it cost? And how many of those members will actually compete, rather than just swim for recreation? What financial investment will the club make towards it?
Any other outside body (swimming club, County Council, NHS, University) wants a bigger pool, then find the money and be prepared to contribute annually to its upkeep.
The City of Worcester can't make a fairer offer than that.
BrownSauce
says...
3:56pm Wed 13 Mar 13
knick-knack wrote:I'm in full agreement, but what is most worrying about this is the inability of the council to see it that clearly.
CJH wrote:CJH, I'd take it further than that. The people of Worcester only need a 6 lane pool an we will be paying that debt back for 40 years!
How many members does Worcester Swimming Club have? They say they 'must' have a new competition size pool. Leaving aside the general public's use of it, how much per member will it cost? And how many of those members will actually compete, rather than just swim for recreation? What financial investment will the club make towards it?
Any other outside body (swimming club, County Council, NHS, University) wants a bigger pool, then find the money and be prepared to contribute annually to its upkeep.
The City of Worcester can't make a fairer offer than that.
Like a bunch of juveniles, they just want to build a bigger pool, and they are priming us to take on bigger debts than we can afford. My kids used to do this to me when they wanted something we couldn't really afford!
There is not an ounce of business acumen in this shower.
DermotItis
says...
5:11pm Wed 13 Mar 13
There are so many demands from the people of this city, and I think that the council has lost touch with reality.
How about getting into debt building new homes for those in need? We used to call it council housing. Central Government are lending vast sums for that at very low interest rates. We could probably afford to get into even more debt at those low rates!
If we are going to get into debt, then let it be for something worthwhile, and not as frivolous as a county standard swimming pool and gym.
knick-knack
says...
7:00pm Wed 13 Mar 13
DermotItis wrote:That would be 100 homes for Worcesters needy. Probably cheaper than housing them in rented property.
This is a debate about the fact that we can borrow some money, and so what are we going to get into debt for?
There are so many demands from the people of this city, and I think that the council has lost touch with reality.
How about getting into debt building new homes for those in need? We used to call it council housing. Central Government are lending vast sums for that at very low interest rates. We could probably afford to get into even more debt at those low rates!
If we are going to get into debt, then let it be for something worthwhile, and not as frivolous as a county standard swimming pool and gym.
green49
says...
8:20pm Wed 13 Mar 13
CJH
says...
9:33pm Wed 13 Mar 13
green49 wrote:Wanting something and needing something are not the same. We need money spent on schools, hospitals, social services, roads...need I go on?
Having been involved with the swimming club in the past Worcester needs an olympic size pool, why build anything else? swimming has a massive following and Worcester has a good competative squad and with the city expanding all the time it can only be common sense to build a pool that's good enough for competition, but then when did common sense come into it?
Landy44
says...
10:08pm Wed 13 Mar 13
SERIOUSLY? REALLY????
Has Marc Bayliss seen what's going on in the real world?
This will only be the most vital decision in a generation if they decide to go ahead and spend money we don't have, mortgaging our futures even more than they already are.
These people aren't fit to work for us anymore. They need voting out at the next opportunity. Let's hope they haven't done more damage by then.
knick-knack
says...
11:15pm Wed 13 Mar 13
green49 wrote:Common sense is not so common.
Having been involved with the swimming club in the past Worcester needs an olympic size pool, why build anything else? swimming has a massive following and Worcester has a good competative squad and with the city expanding all the time it can only be common sense to build a pool that's good enough for competition, but then when did common sense come into it?
― Voltaire
iamthebinman
says...
6:44am Thu 14 Mar 13
Hwicce
says...
8:18am Thu 14 Mar 13
green49 wrote:If they have such a massive following then put your hands in your pockets and pay for the thing yourself.
Having been involved with the swimming club in the past Worcester needs an olympic size pool, why build anything else? swimming has a massive following and Worcester has a good competative squad and with the city expanding all the time it can only be common sense to build a pool that's good enough for competition, but then when did common sense come into it?
Other Groups/Clubs etc. have to buy their own facilities, why doesn't the swimming club?
jb
says...
8:25am Thu 14 Mar 13
I wonder if the people of the city who pay their council tax would put a new swimming pool on a list of priorities for the council to address? I certainly wouldn't.
I appreciate that there are people who are committed to competitive swimming and represent the city but for the majority of residents it's not a priority.
green49
says...
9:03am Thu 14 Mar 13
CJH
says...
9:22am Thu 14 Mar 13
Fishy
says...
9:25am Thu 14 Mar 13
If they weren't trying to get this new pool built people would be complaining about the state of the existing one and wanting their taxes to be spent on a decent pool.
If they were looking to build something new but slightly smaller there would be complaints that it wasn't big enough.
They can't please all the people all the time so why try to please anybody???
Hwicce
says...
10:02am Thu 14 Mar 13
green49 wrote:I'm intrigued with your use of we. The Club may wish to compete in national swimming but most Worcester residents who use a pool just want a bit of water for some fun.
CJH and Hwicce i was not saying we can afford it but if we build a new one there's no point in building the same thing, People do put there hands in there pockets too and they have in the past but there comes a time when vision for the future is needed, maybe its not the right time now but we should be planning for when it is, i do find some comments reguarding this based on little knowledge of the club, if we want to compete in the national swimming then we need the tools to do it, , get developers to put money into it, they take enough in profits when they build houses etc destroy our communities with large developments, make them pay towards it.
That's why, if, this pool is built it should have trainer pools, fun pools, wave machines and slides way before an 8-lane 50m pool.
If my money is going to be used to build a new pool then at least build one I would like to go to.
knick-knack
says...
11:05am Thu 14 Mar 13
Hwicce wrote:Nice point, in fact if it was a fun pool then I might want to go swimming occasionally again.
green49 wrote:I'm intrigued with your use of we. The Club may wish to compete in national swimming but most Worcester residents who use a pool just want a bit of water for some fun.
CJH and Hwicce i was not saying we can afford it but if we build a new one there's no point in building the same thing, People do put there hands in there pockets too and they have in the past but there comes a time when vision for the future is needed, maybe its not the right time now but we should be planning for when it is, i do find some comments reguarding this based on little knowledge of the club, if we want to compete in the national swimming then we need the tools to do it, , get developers to put money into it, they take enough in profits when they build houses etc destroy our communities with large developments, make them pay towards it.
That's why, if, this pool is built it should have trainer pools, fun pools, wave machines and slides way before an 8-lane 50m pool.
If my money is going to be used to build a new pool then at least build one I would like to go to.
Swimming up and down lanes is boring, and I always seem to get kicked in the face by some competitive swimmer! I could get my own back on them if there was a slide.
Of course, the whole notion is just in fairy-tale land, and I am sure that the county council who are making heavy redundancies are not going to magic £5million out of the air to help, especially with an election in May and the Cons already know that they are going to get marmalised!
green49
says...
1:53pm Thu 14 Mar 13
green49
says...
1:55pm Thu 14 Mar 13
CJH
says...
2:58pm Thu 14 Mar 13
New Kid on the Block
says...
4:09pm Thu 14 Mar 13
I am not a member of any club but when I go to a pool I want to be able to swim. I am not interested in slides, wave machines or splashing about in shallow water, though many other people do want exactly these things.
If this pool is built it will need a lot of funding that doesn't come from ratepayers. It will also need to include a proper pool as well as play facilities otherwise we might as well not bother.
green49
says...
7:37am Sat 16 Mar 13
green49
says...
11:35am Sat 16 Mar 13
A pool for all to use and as Worcester is going to expand if the developers have there way then we will need facilities for all and what we have now in the city is not good enough for everyone to use, i know money is hard to come by now but facilities needed to accomodate the people of Worcester needs to be built to suit all needs.
Any new Center like a pool and liesure center can be built in phases it does not all have to be done at once although that would be the ideal.
Lew Smoralz
says...
5:40pm Sat 16 Mar 13
green49 wrote:Which bit if "we are skint" don't you and the spendthrifts on the city council understand?
Hwicce my use of we i mean all of us taxpayers.
A pool for all to use and as Worcester is going to expand if the developers have there way then we will need facilities for all and what we have now in the city is not good enough for everyone to use, i know money is hard to come by now but facilities needed to accomodate the people of Worcester needs to be built to suit all needs.
Any new Center like a pool and liesure center can be built in phases it does not all have to be done at once although that would be the ideal.
How dare anybody try and get us into more debt, when we are already paying back large sums of interest on existing loans.
Taxpayers cannot afford higher taxes. Taxpayers are going hungry and charities are feeding them and their children.
There are thousands who will have big problems with the existing taxes, many will have to default. And you want us to get into debt to buy you and your pals a new swimming pool?
If this treble dip recession carries on, we may have to sell-off the existing pool and other council assets. Does that help you understand what is happening to this country?
Once the economy turns around, then it might be possible to get serious about a new pool, but until then I think it would be better if you all stopped making yourselves look so out of touch with reality.
green49
says...
10:31am Mon 18 Mar 13
5:40pm Sat 16 Mar 13
green49 wrote:
Hwicce my use of we i mean all of us taxpayers.
A pool for all to use and as Worcester is going to expand if the developers have there way then we will need facilities for all and what we have now in the city is not good enough for everyone to use, i know money is hard to come by now but facilities needed to accomodate the people of Worcester needs to be built to suit all needs.
Any new Center like a pool and liesure center can be built in phases it does not all have to be done at once although that would be the ideal.
Which bit if "we are skint" don't you and the spendthrifts on the city council understand?
How dare anybody try and get us into more debt, when we are already paying back large sums of interest on existing loans.
Taxpayers cannot afford higher taxes. Taxpayers are going hungry and charities are feeding them and their children.
There are thousands who will have big problems with the existing taxes, many will have to default. And you want us to get into debt to buy you and your pals a new swimming pool?
If this treble dip recession carries on, we may have to sell-off the existing pool and other council assets. Does that help you understand what is happening to this country?
Once the economy turns around, then it might be possible to get serious about a new pool, but until then I think it would be better if you all stopped making yourselves look so out of touch with reality.
You should read my comment again as i didn't say now!!
CJH says...
12:08pm Wed 13 Mar 13