Act before a child dies on jammed road

TAILBACK: Residents are concerned about the parking situation in Chesterton Gardens and Darwin Avenue, Worcester. TAILBACK: Residents are concerned about the parking situation in Chesterton Gardens and Darwin Avenue, Worcester.

A CHILD could be knocked over and killed unless urgent action is taken to combat problem parking on a busy Worcester road, say residents.

People who live in Chesterton Gardens and Darwin Avenue, off Newtown Road, Worcester, are calling for ‘access only’ restrictions similar to prohibitions on other roads near Worcestershire Royal Hospital, including Aconbury Close and Linksview Crescent. However, West Mercia Police say they do not support such orders, which are designed to prevent roads being used by “unsuitable volumes of traffic”. But despite police reservations, the county council has introduced 50 of them in Worcester and 185 across the county, the first dating back to 1975.

Teacher Joe Lyons, of Chesterton Gardens, said he was concerned about the safety of children in the area, including his own children, Ben, four, and Emi, two.

“My concern is safety. Somebody is going to get knocked over,” he said.

“The cars are parked half on the pavement and half on the road and children can run out between the cars.

“I would like to see the roads as ‘access only’. This is people putting their head in the sand – they don’t have to live here.”

A consultation letter to residents was sent out on March 1 with feedback expected to be sent back by the end of the month.

The letter, signed by Mike Digger of West Mercia Police on behalf of the chief constable and Sally Everest of the county council, said police do not support the orders because of a policy by the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). However, further investigations by your Worcester News reveals the ACPO has no such policy and the letter was mistaken.

In the same letter residents are asked to back ‘waiting restrictions’ instead of an order to prevent parking.

However, some residents have said that if the ‘access only’ restriction is difficult to enforce then it should be removed from other roads off Newtown Road to ‘share the pain’ of parking which they say is often people who work at, or visiting, the hospital.

Vicki Davies, of Chesterton Gardens, said: “This estate has narrow roads and the houses have no front gardens. Consequently small children cycle in the roads and run to and from the park area where they play and on their way to and from school.

“Elderly people are also now at risk as the council decided to put access to the care home through this narrow estate.”

She said of the options letter: “The letter, signed for the chief constable, advises us that any decision we make can’t be reviewed for two years and also that one option isn’t supported by the police in line with ACPO (Association of Chief Police Officers) policy. As no such written policy exists at either ACPO or West Mercia level, I am shocked by the deceit.”

John Fraser, Worcestershire County Council’s highways manager, said: “We appreciate that parking in Darwin Avenue and Chesterton Gardens creates concern for some residents. We are working with the police and residents to introduce measures.”

Comments(23)

Hwicce says...
2:32pm Fri 15 Mar 13

Well, a good start would be if the residents didn't park on the pavement. That way the kids could walk on it instead of the road.

Also are the local kids immune from being hit/run over by the residents cars? Because if they are not then its pointless making it residents only as there will still be cars and therefore still be accidents.

Arthur Blenkinsop says...
2:54pm Fri 15 Mar 13

We were always taught the 'greencross code' when we were young - how to cross a road without wandering about or playing around aimlessly in the middle of it. We were also taught not to run out into the road between parked cars. We were also taught that cars and road surfaces were, as a rule, a lot harder than skin and bone so it was a good idea not to get too involved with them!
Pardon my ignorance, but isn't basic road safety taught to kids anymore?

Hwicce says...
3:09pm Fri 15 Mar 13

Arthur Blenkinsop wrote:
We were always taught the 'greencross code' when we were young - how to cross a road without wandering about or playing around aimlessly in the middle of it. We were also taught not to run out into the road between parked cars. We were also taught that cars and road surfaces were, as a rule, a lot harder than skin and bone so it was a good idea not to get too involved with them!
Pardon my ignorance, but isn't basic road safety taught to kids anymore?
I think the current mantra is "what ever happens to me it is someone else's fault".

truth must out says...
3:12pm Fri 15 Mar 13

Hwicce wrote:
Well, a good start would be if the residents didn't park on the pavement. That way the kids could walk on it instead of the road.

Also are the local kids immune from being hit/run over by the residents cars? Because if they are not then its pointless making it residents only as there will still be cars and therefore still be accidents.
So who gave all these people permission to park on the pavement?? Anybody with a pushchair is obviously going to have a problem here. Get the parking attendants up there to sort it out!!

redhood says...
3:17pm Fri 15 Mar 13

That is not nearly as bad as wylds lane, 2 primary school on wylds lane yet no speed hump or safe place to cross.

I take my children to Stanley road school in the morning , most day it takes over 5 minutes to cross the road on wylds between 8.30am-9.00 am
Midland road is just as bad Even with crossing person. I very strongly believe that either a zebra crossing or traffic lights are need either before some is killed.

A child was hit by car on Tuesday on Midland load and last week a lorry nearly ran over children on the foot path as it could not turn right on to Midland road

Every day I see car mounting the footpath to get past lorries or other cars , this road really need to be a one way or controlled by lights to make it one way system.


It is major safety concern.

daffy says...
3:31pm Fri 15 Mar 13

Hwicce wrote:
Arthur Blenkinsop wrote: We were always taught the 'greencross code' when we were young - how to cross a road without wandering about or playing around aimlessly in the middle of it. We were also taught not to run out into the road between parked cars. We were also taught that cars and road surfaces were, as a rule, a lot harder than skin and bone so it was a good idea not to get too involved with them! Pardon my ignorance, but isn't basic road safety taught to kids anymore?
I think the current mantra is "what ever happens to me it is someone else's fault".
agree with the above, children may be being taught road safety in school but the parents are not following through they got the attitude that if the child gets run over (god forbid) that the driver will get the blame, their child will be totally inocent. i don't think it's illegal to park on the path anymore only get fined if they're causing a blockage to other vehicles. children as young as 3 are being taught that side roads are their playground.

redrhino says...
4:00pm Fri 15 Mar 13

I thought it was illegal to park on the pavement? I live on a busy bus route and see buses,cars and lorries mount the pavement on a regular basis because residents have to park on one side of the road and its just not wide enough to allow for vehicles to pass each other.

skychip says...
4:30pm Fri 15 Mar 13

It is illegal to park on the pavement, but when I spoke to the Police they inferred that unless you couldn't walk past the car they turned a blind eye to it.

grumpy woman says...
4:37pm Fri 15 Mar 13

If children are not road safety aware they should not be out alone on the streets. Parents are responsible for their children.
However, this parking problem must be annoying for residents and should be looked at.

laidback says...
6:07pm Fri 15 Mar 13

Pavement parking in Worcester, Exeter and Hastings is an offence under the terms of a private Act of Parliament under which the City Council can issue fixed penalty notices to offenders. Perhaps WCC should be attending more to its responsibilities in this matter.

susiesmith456 says...
6:15pm Fri 15 Mar 13

How many times do we hear of the Police being economical with the truth?

On behalf of the Chief Constable no less, Mike Digger states that the police do not support access only orders - despite the fact that the County Council has 185 of them in place across the County and further backs up the case by citing fictitious policies to support his argument.

Should we be heartened the Chief Constable takes such an interest in what appears to be a local policing issue or concerned that if West Mercia can make up policies on something so (relatively) insignificant, what else will they make up?

wornoutprinter says...
6:30pm Fri 15 Mar 13

Here we go again! the Nimby's buy a house near a hospital and then moan cos people park in 'their' road! anyway Arthur and co make a good point, what are your kids doing playing on or near the road without a parents supervision? Also are some of these cars the residents own cars? If so I will have to ask for an 'access only' for my road so that my children can play out on the road. But really folks, this just sounds to me like it was another slow news day and James Connell was struggling for a story As to the lady being shocked by the deipt sounds a bit melodramatic or am I missing something and there is a hidden Darwingate scandal ? I think you people need to consider how lucky you are to live in your own home in a nice part of the world rather than some of the strife torn areas we keep seeing on the news!

wornoutprinter says...
6:32pm Fri 15 Mar 13

sorry that should be deceipt ! my tablet can't spell!!

susiesmith456 says...
10:18pm Fri 15 Mar 13

In relation to worn out printer, I think the comments could be said for most of the stories in the Worcester News ....

broken6 says...
11:59pm Fri 15 Mar 13

"The cars are parked half on the pavement and half on the road and children can run out between the cars"

So, if they are parked fully on the road, the children can't run out between the cars????

Genius!!!

Jabbadad says...
11:56am Sat 16 Mar 13

When the police have been approached many times about issues relating to parking on the pavements they normally reply that only when the pavement is obstructed to prevent the passage of a Pushchair / Buggy, or a wheelchair or particularly a pedestrian, is an an offence committed.
As to parked cars, when narrowing a road, I have found that under these conditions responsible drivers will drive a lot slower, so it could possibly be safer.
And yes 60 years ago without the Green Cross Code we were taught to look both ways and to act in a sensible and responsible way, and even with a lot less traffic kids still got run over.As to the kids playing actually on the roads this has to be an offence.

pinkfluff says...
1:07pm Sat 16 Mar 13

It sounds like a little brushing up on behaviour management is needed.

Safest solution really because there are cars everywhere and children will need to learn about road safety.

DarrenM says...
1:08pm Sat 16 Mar 13

and even if they weren't lying and there actually was an ACPO policy, so what? Why should a senior police officers club with no statutory authority determine local police policy?

laidback says...
7:17am Sun 17 Mar 13

I reiterate my comment above. Footway (pavement) parking, except in London by GLC Order, is not a police matter unless obstruction is a factor. Footway parking by vehicle owners in Worcester City is a specific, prescribed offence for which a penalty charge notice can be issued. Complaints regarding footway parking are a matter for Worcester City Council to remedy.

DarrenM says...
7:18pm Sun 17 Mar 13

Agreed laidback - but Worcester CC can't be bothered to enforce obstruction offences ,that's why you can leave advertising boards all over the high street.

In fact they even claim some mythical power (that they won't state what it is) to allow people to commit obstruction.

Oh and the GLC hasn't existed for about 25 years,I've no idea if GLC Orders were transferred to the GLA.

slysheep says...
9:53pm Sun 17 Mar 13

Yet again the public pay the price of poor planning policy. The hospital should have been built with adequate parking provision. I'd also point out that there shouldn't be anything wrong with letting children play out on the road rather than wrapping them up in cotton wool getting fat on their PlayStation. As it happens the roads in question are cul-de-sacs so discouraging unnecessary doesn't seem unreasonable.

laidback says...
12:41pm Wed 20 Mar 13

The Order under the GLC (General Powers) Act 1974 Section 15 is still effective Darren. There is no excuse for WCC as all local authorities were instructed on footway parking measures and permitted signage by DfT letter on 21st February 2011. Possibly a better way to shake up WCC is for those aggrieved to register their complaint with charity "FixMyStreet" which will take up the matter and publicly report on subsequent local authority compliance. Do not these people have a City Councillor?

i-cycle says...
12:05am Tue 26 Mar 13

West Mercia Police also say they won't enforce 20mph zones which also discourage inappropriate use.

20mph has the added advantage of reducing the seriousness of any casualties that may occur.

The human body has evolved to withstand being hit by or hitting objects (cars) at up to 20mph. The chances of being killed in a collision over 20mph rises exponentially.

In recent correspondence West Mercia Police similarly quote outdated legislation and were not aware of a recent ACPO retraction that had to be sent to a recent Government enquiry.

Over a third of local Council's have already looked at the advantages and limited number of disadvantages of 20mph and chosen to introduce them in residential streets where over 11 million people live. Yet this is denied to Worcestershire residents.

Worcestershire County, as highway authority refuse point blank to even consider the option. A key reason given is that West Mercia police quote outdated and misinterpreted legislation that they don't have to enforce 20mph speed limits.

As we come up to the May County Council elections all politicians know that traffic and speed in residential areas is one of the main concerns. Yet the current controlling group on the County Council refuse to even consider doing anything about it and seem to use the Police stance as an excuse.

Surely we don't live in a police or ACPO state?

If residents want a problem solved, then their elected politicians should at least look into it.

And if the political will is to reflect public concern the Police should certainly not be trying to block it.

Mike Digger has been proven wrong in this case. He's also wrong that the Police don't have to enforce 20mph zones.

If he is correct, how come large parts the UK's residential streets are already 20mph, including some parts of Worcester and Pershore HIgh Street?

If you're concerned about speed and traffic where you live why not ask the prospective candidates for May County Council elections when they come knocking. Where do they stand on making your residential street safer and quieter? If elected, do they intend to do anything about your concerns and those of your neighbours?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree