Brum council chief rebuffs Worcester jobs anger

Worcester News: New development: on the agenda of a county growth plan New development: on the agenda of a county growth plan

MEDDLING Brummie council chiefs trying to pinch your jobs have delivered an extraordinary rebuff to Worcester - and refused to back down on what they call “a point of principle”.

Sir Albert Bore, the leader of Birmingham City Council, said his officers could not “turn a blind eye” and allow a key county growth blueprint to go ahead without their input.

In a letter to Worcester MP Robin Walker, he repeated concerns about the South Worcestershire Development Plan (SWDP) including too many jobs.

As your Worcester News reported in October, during a public examination over the blueprint, planning officers from Birmingham and the Black Country said it threatened the prosperity of their towns and cities.

They said the current figure of 25,000 jobs by 2030 should be revised because it could harm employment opportunities in their region.

The stance infuriated Worcestershire’s MPs, who called it “outrageous” and sent a letter to Councillor Bore following our coverage.

In the letter Coun Bore claimed he was a “great supporter” of jobs and growth across the country, but feared for the prospects of the Second City

He also said his main concern is the affect on the Longbridge industrial plant in Birmingham, which is still trying to recover after the collapse of MG Rover in 2005.

He said: “As you will be aware I am a great supporter of boosting jobs and growth, not just in Birmingham but across the wider area including south Worcestershire.

“What the inspector has concluded, in line with the Government’s new national guidelines, is that there should be an appropriate balance struck between population and housing growth.

“This was, and remains an important principle behind our representations but you could not reasonably expect (Birmingham) city council to turn a blind eye to a situation that could have a damaging impact on the prospects of developing and creating jobs on the land at Longbridge, which is an area that has suffered from severe economic misfortune.”

He also said Birmingham supported the number of homes earmarked in the plan, which is currently 23,000.

Inspector Roger Clews has since backed the tally of jobs, refuting suggestions it is too high, but wants the number of properties to be increased.

District councils in Worcester, Malvern and Wychavon, which worked on the SWDP, are currently working on a revised figure of homes.

Mr Walker said the letter “didn’t really answer” his concerns over their meddling.

“It’s a pretty standard response, it doesn’t really address our concerns over what they were trying to say,” he said.

Comments (6)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

3:49pm Fri 6 Dec 13

Hwicce says...

Who gives a tinkers what Albert Bore thinks?
Who gives a tinkers what Albert Bore thinks? Hwicce

5:32pm Fri 6 Dec 13

b1ackb1rd says...

Bore is as Bore does
Bore is as Bore does b1ackb1rd

12:53am Sat 7 Dec 13

CJH says...

There's an easy solution to this. Bang their bl**dy heads together until they stop acting like spoiled children fighting over who's got the most Lego, then sit them on the naughty step until they play nicely together again.
There's an easy solution to this. Bang their bl**dy heads together until they stop acting like spoiled children fighting over who's got the most Lego, then sit them on the naughty step until they play nicely together again. CJH

12:22pm Sat 7 Dec 13

WorcsBornandBred says...

In the current climate, if companies and private investors want to plough their own money into creating jobs and widening industry, who seriously has the right to deny this!?

It really doesn't matter where jobs are created, these leaders and councillors need to all have a reality checks and get over themselves.
In the current climate, if companies and private investors want to plough their own money into creating jobs and widening industry, who seriously has the right to deny this!? It really doesn't matter where jobs are created, these leaders and councillors need to all have a reality checks and get over themselves. WorcsBornandBred

4:48pm Sat 7 Dec 13

copierman says...

Birmingham does not get this by bullying other councils. They need to remember most of the people who WORK in Birmingham live on the outer fringes of the city or beyond.
Birmingham does not get this by bullying other councils. They need to remember most of the people who WORK in Birmingham live on the outer fringes of the city or beyond. copierman

11:34am Sun 8 Dec 13

Jabbadad says...

I can recall when New labour ruled our councills and were bitterly complaining against additional housing for Worcester, which in the words of Bob Peachey then a councillor, encouraged commutors to live here and travel to Birmingham for higher paid jobs. What was overlooked was that while yes we needed and still do jobs locally, commutors just worked along the road as it were and brought lovely incomes back to spend where they lived. I see no problems there at all.
I can recall when New labour ruled our councills and were bitterly complaining against additional housing for Worcester, which in the words of Bob Peachey then a councillor, encouraged commutors to live here and travel to Birmingham for higher paid jobs. What was overlooked was that while yes we needed and still do jobs locally, commutors just worked along the road as it were and brought lovely incomes back to spend where they lived. I see no problems there at all. Jabbadad

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree