East Street in Worcester left partially blocked after collision

Worcester News: The crash in East Street, Worcester, involved a pedestrian and a bicycle The crash in East Street, Worcester, involved a pedestrian and a bicycle

A WORCESTER street is partially blocked after a crash involving a pedestrian and a cyclist.

Traffic is struggling in both directions in East Street after the incident, between Southfield Street and Northfield Street, near the railway line.

It is understood those involved suffered only minor injuries in the collision, which happened at around 7.30am.

 

Comments (14)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:38am Fri 13 Dec 13

Bufton Tufton says...

If those involved suffered only minor injuries why is the street partly blocked ? It cant take much effort to clear the debry from the road, its a bicycle not a car.. In India several people are killed everyday by being run over by trains in the Mumbi Crush Hour and they just throw the body off the tracks and let the trains continue. Saves inconveniencing other people.
If those involved suffered only minor injuries why is the street partly blocked ? It cant take much effort to clear the debry from the road, its a bicycle not a car.. In India several people are killed everyday by being run over by trains in the Mumbi Crush Hour and they just throw the body off the tracks and let the trains continue. Saves inconveniencing other people. Bufton Tufton

9:58am Fri 13 Dec 13

tub_thumper says...

Bufton Tufton wrote:
Cyclists are a Nuisance on the Road by James Connell Worcester News.
http://www.worcester

news.co.uk/features/

fairpoint/10800707.C

yclists_are_a_nuisan

ce_on_the_road/
What's this linked article got to do with this story? A pedestrian was involved too. For all you know, the pedestrian could have walked out in front of the cyclist. Pedestrians are renowened for wearing dark clothing. And the road is probably partially blocked because the police are probably investigating the scene. The story gives very little info. A car could have even took out both the cyclist and pedestrian. Think before you write (or troll for that matter)! You're compassion in comparison to India is unbelievable. You do know that we are in England, right?
[quote][p][bold]Bufton Tufton[/bold] wrote: Cyclists are a Nuisance on the Road by James Connell Worcester News. http://www.worcester news.co.uk/features/ fairpoint/10800707.C yclists_are_a_nuisan ce_on_the_road/[/p][/quote]What's this linked article got to do with this story? A pedestrian was involved too. For all you know, the pedestrian could have walked out in front of the cyclist. Pedestrians are renowened for wearing dark clothing. And the road is probably partially blocked because the police are probably investigating the scene. The story gives very little info. A car could have even took out both the cyclist and pedestrian. Think before you write (or troll for that matter)! You're compassion in comparison to India is unbelievable. You do know that we are in England, right? tub_thumper

10:23am Fri 13 Dec 13

Ted Elgar says...

Cue hilarious editorial about cyclists.
Cue hilarious editorial about cyclists. Ted Elgar

4:20pm Fri 13 Dec 13

Nortynorse says...

More than likely the cyclist had no lights and was riding on the path!!!!!

Ban em all
More than likely the cyclist had no lights and was riding on the path!!!!! Ban em all Nortynorse

4:28pm Fri 13 Dec 13

tub_thumper says...

Nortynorse wrote:
More than likely the cyclist had no lights and was riding on the path!!!!!

Ban em all
Troll...
[quote][p][bold]Nortynorse[/bold] wrote: More than likely the cyclist had no lights and was riding on the path!!!!! Ban em all[/p][/quote]Troll... tub_thumper

4:34pm Fri 13 Dec 13

tub_thumper says...

tub_thumper wrote:
Nortynorse wrote:
More than likely the cyclist had no lights and was riding on the path!!!!!

Ban em all
Troll...
An incident involving a "pedestrian" and a "cyclist".

Two people involved. Why pick on the cyclist? In my experience, if pedestrians are waiting to cross the road and don't hear an engine then some just walk out in front of you.

I think some uneducated people here like to troll and cause arguments. It's apparent that they don't read the article and thread properly before making their such outlandish statements.
[quote][p][bold]tub_thumper[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Nortynorse[/bold] wrote: More than likely the cyclist had no lights and was riding on the path!!!!! Ban em all[/p][/quote]Troll...[/p][/quote]An incident involving a "pedestrian" and a "cyclist". Two people involved. Why pick on the cyclist? In my experience, if pedestrians are waiting to cross the road and don't hear an engine then some just walk out in front of you. I think some uneducated people here like to troll and cause arguments. It's apparent that they don't read the article and thread properly before making their such outlandish statements. tub_thumper

6:38pm Fri 13 Dec 13

pinkfluff says...

tub_thumper wrote:
tub_thumper wrote:
Nortynorse wrote:
More than likely the cyclist had no lights and was riding on the path!!!!!

Ban em all
Troll...
An incident involving a "pedestrian" and a "cyclist".

Two people involved. Why pick on the cyclist? In my experience, if pedestrians are waiting to cross the road and don't hear an engine then some just walk out in front of you.

I think some uneducated people here like to troll and cause arguments. It's apparent that they don't read the article and thread properly before making their such outlandish statements.
Don't feed the trolls lol
[quote][p][bold]tub_thumper[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]tub_thumper[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Nortynorse[/bold] wrote: More than likely the cyclist had no lights and was riding on the path!!!!! Ban em all[/p][/quote]Troll...[/p][/quote]An incident involving a "pedestrian" and a "cyclist". Two people involved. Why pick on the cyclist? In my experience, if pedestrians are waiting to cross the road and don't hear an engine then some just walk out in front of you. I think some uneducated people here like to troll and cause arguments. It's apparent that they don't read the article and thread properly before making their such outlandish statements.[/p][/quote]Don't feed the trolls lol pinkfluff

8:28pm Fri 13 Dec 13

Jabbadad says...

Seems that you also don't read the reports tub thumper. It says a pedestrian and a cyclist, where is the mention of a car?
Seems that you also don't read the reports tub thumper. It says a pedestrian and a cyclist, where is the mention of a car? Jabbadad

10:19pm Fri 13 Dec 13

i-cycle says...

Seems like a slow news day at WN towers.

Cyclist and pedestrian in collision. No serious injuries, but a bit of traffic congestion on a small side street.

"news' story posted at 08.22 and still there as "Breaking News" at 22.14.

C'mon WN put your enthralled readers out of there misery.

Did anyone survive? Is it safe to go anywhere near East Street?

Why are WN sales plummeting?
Seems like a slow news day at WN towers. Cyclist and pedestrian in collision. No serious injuries, but a bit of traffic congestion on a small side street. "news' story posted at 08.22 and still there as "Breaking News" at 22.14. C'mon WN put your enthralled readers out of there misery. Did anyone survive? Is it safe to go anywhere near East Street? Why are WN sales plummeting? i-cycle

1:13am Sat 14 Dec 13

tub_thumper says...

Jabbadad wrote:
Seems that you also don't read the reports tub thumper. It says a pedestrian and a cyclist, where is the mention of a car?
Obviously Jabbadad, you don't understand the concept of using hypothesis...

And still you refrain from answering my questions on previous posts to other stories. Still, at least I base my arguments on fact...
[quote][p][bold]Jabbadad[/bold] wrote: Seems that you also don't read the reports tub thumper. It says a pedestrian and a cyclist, where is the mention of a car?[/p][/quote]Obviously Jabbadad, you don't understand the concept of using hypothesis... And still you refrain from answering my questions on previous posts to other stories. Still, at least I base my arguments on fact... tub_thumper

10:08am Sat 14 Dec 13

Jabbadad says...

I don't reply when the reply is not worth replying to. And some postings on here are as from story writers not tellers, and many without facts.Hypothesis Theroem or not.
.
I don't reply when the reply is not worth replying to. And some postings on here are as from story writers not tellers, and many without facts.Hypothesis Theroem or not. . Jabbadad

12:20pm Sat 14 Dec 13

batchelorboy says...

Jabbadad wrote:
I don't reply when the reply is not worth replying to. And some postings on here are as from story writers not tellers, and many without facts.Hypothesis Theroem or not.
.
You only seem to reply when it's possible the Tories are to blame...
[quote][p][bold]Jabbadad[/bold] wrote: I don't reply when the reply is not worth replying to. And some postings on here are as from story writers not tellers, and many without facts.Hypothesis Theroem or not. .[/p][/quote]You only seem to reply when it's possible the Tories are to blame... batchelorboy

9:25am Sun 15 Dec 13

tub_thumper says...

batchelorboy wrote:
Jabbadad wrote:
I don't reply when the reply is not worth replying to. And some postings on here are as from story writers not tellers, and many without facts.Hypothesis Theroem or not.
.
You only seem to reply when it's possible the Tories are to blame...
Haha!

"Ignorance" is a better word...
[quote][p][bold]batchelorboy[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Jabbadad[/bold] wrote: I don't reply when the reply is not worth replying to. And some postings on here are as from story writers not tellers, and many without facts.Hypothesis Theroem or not. .[/p][/quote]You only seem to reply when it's possible the Tories are to blame...[/p][/quote]Haha! "Ignorance" is a better word... tub_thumper

10:19am Sun 15 Dec 13

Jabbadad says...

batchelorboy. that currently gives me plenty of scope then, and I do also comment on New labour and the current regime at Worcester City as I did when Labour were in Government. However if you only read information relative to the Tories then you would miss that.
And of course dispite any loyalty to the Tory / Government / Party they are the ones who are attacking the most vulnerable in our society, and if God help me I was a Tory supporter, I would be deeply concerned when I looked in the mirror and would probably go into hiding, as just might happen to the Tories in the May elections, since they are not worthy of any Older or Vulnerable Persons vote.. .
batchelorboy. that currently gives me plenty of scope then, and I do also comment on New labour and the current regime at Worcester City as I did when Labour were in Government. However if you only read information relative to the Tories then you would miss that. And of course dispite any loyalty to the Tory / Government / Party they are the ones who are attacking the most vulnerable in our society, and if God help me I was a Tory supporter, I would be deeply concerned when I looked in the mirror and would probably go into hiding, as just might happen to the Tories in the May elections, since they are not worthy of any Older or Vulnerable Persons vote.. . Jabbadad

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree