Council tax rise of nearly two per cent confirmed as budget is agreed

Worcester News: 0714520701 Paul Jackson 13.02.14 Worcester Future Lives protest at County Hall. (3995649) 0714520701 Paul Jackson 13.02.14 Worcester Future Lives protest at County Hall. (3995649)

A COUNCIL tax rise for households across Worcestershire was confirmed today - as well as major cuts to spending.

Worcestershire County Council has approved its 2014/15 budget, which will see taxpayers fork out more for the first time since 2010.

A 1.9 per cent rise will add at least £19.88 to the average yearly band D bill of £1,453 from April.

The end increase will nudge closer to £30 once rises from the police, fire service and district councils are factored in, with confirmation on the final bills due by Tuesday, February 25.

The budget at County Hall contains spending reductions of nearly £25 million, and was backed after lengthy arguments between all the parties.

It includes removing around £1.9 million from the £3 million spent on public transport in Worcestershire, and slashing 60 per cent off a yearly £15 million pot for vulnerable people.

During a full council meeting both Labour and the Liberal Democrats made bids to alter the budget, with both looking to save more bus routes from the chop, but it was scuppered.

The debate took place amid a protest outside the building, with Unison staff turning up armed with whistles, bells and even a vuvuzela to make as much noise as possible.

Jim Price, from Worcestershire's Unison branch, who organised 'Blow the Whistle', said: "Staff are fed up and depressed - they are fearful for their jobs and the message we've got for the council leadership is that they've had enough."

During the debate Labour wanted to save the entire £3 million buses spending, put an extra £500,000 towards domestic violence funding, and put £3.2 million extra towards vulnerable people.

It wanted to take one-off money from the reserve pot, including £600,000 on environmental spending like roads maintenance, and £500,000 from adult services, to pay for it but it was voted down.

The Liberal Democrats, backed by a wave of new councillors from other parties elected in 2013, also put forward an alternative budget based on spending £2 million on buses, a pay rise for the lowest paid staff and £1.5 extra spending on roads, residential care and vulnerable 16-25 year-olds.

But the bid failed after the group said the council should pay for part of it by slashing £450,000 from economic development in 2014/15 and nearly £1 million the following year.

Councillor Marc Bayliss, from the Conservatives, called it "nonsense" while Councillor Richard Udall, for Labour, labelled it "economic suicide".

The budget includes an extra £4 million towards children's social care, as the numbers of children who need intervention continues to rise.

The spending will be paid for from the council tax rise.

It also contains an extra £500,000 into roads maintenance, after the public said it should remain a big priority during widespread public consultations.

But the budget will result in job losses, with at least 600 posts going by 2018, and as many services as possible being handed over to new providers, a move known as commissioning.

There are hopes many organisations who take over services will take council staff with them, limiting the impact on the economy.

Councillor Alan Amos, from Labour, said the Conservatives budget would make the council "an empty, hollow shell" but the leadership said it was "a rational, planned approach" to reduced funding and more demand on services.

Councillor Adrian Hardman, the leader, said: "We acknowledge the future is going to be different, but we are not anti-reform, we embrace reform."

He added that it was "a budget that closes the gap" and will put the council "on a sustainable footing".

Around £99 million needs to be cut from spending by 2018.

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

6:09pm Thu 13 Feb 14

3thinker says...

Surely its about time Worcestershire seriously looked at merging the County and Districts Councils to form a Unitary Authority.

A recent report commissioned by Leicestershire showed how 3.1% or £30M could be saved each year by merging the County and seven district councils there. Ernst & Young estimated the cost of setting up the new Unitary Council would be £12.8M so significant savings would be realised in the first year.

The number of councillors would be reduced from 316 to 100. Perhaps a major reason why its not being looked at locally?
Surely its about time Worcestershire seriously looked at merging the County and Districts Councils to form a Unitary Authority. A recent report commissioned by Leicestershire showed how 3.1% or £30M could be saved each year by merging the County and seven district councils there. Ernst & Young estimated the cost of setting up the new Unitary Council would be £12.8M so significant savings would be realised in the first year. The number of councillors would be reduced from 316 to 100. Perhaps a major reason why its not being looked at locally? 3thinker
  • Score: 6

6:56pm Thu 13 Feb 14

bmoc55 says...

What is depressing about this report is that both Labour and LibDems still insist on opposing every spending cut proposed. Do they really not understand economics??

Also Unite are really thick if they think that blowing a few whistles and waving a couple of banners will change the political scene.
What is depressing about this report is that both Labour and LibDems still insist on opposing every spending cut proposed. Do they really not understand economics?? Also Unite are really thick if they think that blowing a few whistles and waving a couple of banners will change the political scene. bmoc55
  • Score: -4

7:04pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Trisha54 says...

This is just typical of the bandits who run the council. As they pontificate from their ivory towers supported by their tax funded jobs, telling us they will put the councils highway robbery fund up by 1.9% and cut funds for the vulnerable. We are ruled by out of touch, elitist baffoons at both national and local level who have not got a clue what their under the radar rise will do to already, struggling, hardpressed families.
They got this through at 1.9% because they knew a higher rise would involve a public consultation to which no normal person would vote for.
Get rid of the fat cats, get rid of the non jobs and put the vulnerable people of this city at the top of the agenda.
Don't forget councillors of Worcester, you will be old one day and some of you will be in the position you are putting our vulnerable citizens in. Shame on the lot of you
This is just typical of the bandits who run the council. As they pontificate from their ivory towers supported by their tax funded jobs, telling us they will put the councils highway robbery fund up by 1.9% and cut funds for the vulnerable. We are ruled by out of touch, elitist baffoons at both national and local level who have not got a clue what their under the radar rise will do to already, struggling, hardpressed families. They got this through at 1.9% because they knew a higher rise would involve a public consultation to which no normal person would vote for. Get rid of the fat cats, get rid of the non jobs and put the vulnerable people of this city at the top of the agenda. Don't forget councillors of Worcester, you will be old one day and some of you will be in the position you are putting our vulnerable citizens in. Shame on the lot of you Trisha54
  • Score: 6

8:36am Mon 17 Feb 14

green49 says...

The WCC headed by Hardman are a joke, they have mislead all the taxpayers in what has been released about cuts, they have given misleading info to councillors and yet they are in the job to work for the taxpayer? TORY policy is whats being put into place, never mind so called consultation its all been sorted already, it has to hold consultation buy this WCC is not taking any notice of what is being told by experts to them, even the WCC legal team is worried about implications that may arise due to this action, someone will be sued as and when a serious problem arises and it will.
The WCC headed by Hardman are a joke, they have mislead all the taxpayers in what has been released about cuts, they have given misleading info to councillors and yet they are in the job to work for the taxpayer? TORY policy is whats being put into place, never mind so called consultation its all been sorted already, it has to hold consultation buy this WCC is not taking any notice of what is being told by experts to them, even the WCC legal team is worried about implications that may arise due to this action, someone will be sued as and when a serious problem arises and it will. green49
  • Score: 3

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree