Give us guarantees over protecting sites like this, says former Worcester Mayor

Middle Battenhall Farm, in Worcester

Middle Battenhall Farm, in Worcester

First published in News Worcester News: Tom Edwards by , Political Reporter

A FORMER Mayor of Worcester says people have been left "angry and concerned" about the future of a popular city beauty spot - and is pleading for a reprieve.

Councillor David Tibbutt says he is now getting correspondence about saving Middle Battenhall Farm from outside of Worcestershire, such is the fears for it.

He is also calling upon Worcester City Council to give him "an absolute guarantee" that it will not be included in the revised South Worcestershire Development Plan (SWDP) without a full public consultation.

As your Worcester News revealed last year, Miller Homes wants to build 200 new homes on the land, off Red Hill Lane in Battenhall.

The site is seen as a key green lung in the city, is popular with dog walkers and contains ancient fish ponds.

It is also not currently included in the SWDP, but the number of homes in the draft plan has been revised from 23,200 up to as many as 27,300.

No sites have been earmarked for the extra properties yet, ahead of a fresh public examination by an inspector taking place this month.

Cllr Tibbutt, speaking during a full council meeting, said he wanted a cast iron guarantee "any sites not currently allocated" in the SWDP would be subject to consultation before decisions are made on new additions.

"Middle Battenhall Farm is a valued asset to a lot of people, they are angry and concerned and it isn't just people in Worcester," he said.

"I've had a letter from someone in Gloucester about it. Are their concerns unfounded?"

Councillor Geoff Williams, deputy leader and the cabinet member for economic prosperity, said: "At this stage we've got no idea what the inspector's response to the submissions will be.

"It's very dangerous for any member of this chamber to start talking about specific sites, I've said it before and I'll say it again."

The new examination into the SWDP by Government inspector Roger Clews is taking place on Thursday, March 13 and Friday, March 14.

If he accepts the higher figure councils in Worcester, Malvern and Wychavon will then have to decide where the extra homes could go.

In the meantime, Miller Homes is preparing an outline planning application for the Middle Battenhall Farm site.

It says affordable homes will form part of the final plan, and that in response to concerns a signal controlled junction will be created for access to the complex next to the New College.

It also plans to create an interpretation board to alert people to the mediaeval fishponds, and draw up a management plan for the green land just behind the new proposed houses.

Comments (6)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

4:49pm Sat 1 Mar 14

liketoknow says...

yes it's beautiful countryside, but the same can be said about the area earmarked for development around Dines Green .wonderful green spaces gone forever.
yes it's beautiful countryside, but the same can be said about the area earmarked for development around Dines Green .wonderful green spaces gone forever. liketoknow
  • Score: 7

5:52pm Sat 1 Mar 14

skychip says...

The Councils will let developments go through irrespective because they don't have the money to fight the developers should it go to appeal.
The Councils will let developments go through irrespective because they don't have the money to fight the developers should it go to appeal. skychip
  • Score: 1

8:20pm Sat 1 Mar 14

SgtAl says...

Like it or loathe it, Worcester is getting bigger, the decisions have already been made. And to be fair, if it doesn't Worcester will be left behind other similarly sized cities with regards infrastructure and investment.

The question remains; if this additional housing stock shouldn't be built at Battenhall, where should it go?

(You will receive one mark for the answer and one mark for the reasoning of that answer)
Like it or loathe it, Worcester is getting bigger, the decisions have already been made. And to be fair, if it doesn't Worcester will be left behind other similarly sized cities with regards infrastructure and investment. The question remains; if this additional housing stock shouldn't be built at Battenhall, where should it go? (You will receive one mark for the answer and one mark for the reasoning of that answer) SgtAl
  • Score: 2

11:36am Sun 2 Mar 14

willing says...

SgtAl wrote:
Like it or loathe it, Worcester is getting bigger, the decisions have already been made. And to be fair, if it doesn't Worcester will be left behind other similarly sized cities with regards infrastructure and investment.

The question remains; if this additional housing stock shouldn't be built at Battenhall, where should it go?

(You will receive one mark for the answer and one mark for the reasoning of that answer)
I agree with your argument, but I believe we are failing to address the bigger picture, which is about the exponential growth of the UK's population, caused by a ridiculous, undemocratic, and unregulated population boom resulting from eastern European immigration.

We have a relatively small island, with limited land and a limited economy, yet even if we ignore the fact that not one of us have been given a voice in the changes forced upon us by the collusion of Labour and Conservative governments and Brussels, it is lunacy to continue down this path, because the problem of housing, food supply, benefits, the NHS, crime, and education services will continue to worsen. We all need to wake up to this, and make the politicians listen, before it eventually implodes!
[quote][p][bold]SgtAl[/bold] wrote: Like it or loathe it, Worcester is getting bigger, the decisions have already been made. And to be fair, if it doesn't Worcester will be left behind other similarly sized cities with regards infrastructure and investment. The question remains; if this additional housing stock shouldn't be built at Battenhall, where should it go? (You will receive one mark for the answer and one mark for the reasoning of that answer)[/p][/quote]I agree with your argument, but I believe we are failing to address the bigger picture, which is about the exponential growth of the UK's population, caused by a ridiculous, undemocratic, and unregulated population boom resulting from eastern European immigration. We have a relatively small island, with limited land and a limited economy, yet even if we ignore the fact that not one of us have been given a voice in the changes forced upon us by the collusion of Labour and Conservative governments and Brussels, it is lunacy to continue down this path, because the problem of housing, food supply, benefits, the NHS, crime, and education services will continue to worsen. We all need to wake up to this, and make the politicians listen, before it eventually implodes! willing
  • Score: 3

12:02pm Sun 2 Mar 14

liketoknow says...

it would be interesting to hear in terms a layman like me can understand whether all these homes are really needed, or is it just an attempt to kickstart a faltering economy by the government. ie, houses means builders means decorators,plumbers,
suppliers etc; = jobs. = lower unemployment figures. well done government . exchange country side for concrete.
it would be interesting to hear in terms a layman like me can understand whether all these homes are really needed, or is it just an attempt to kickstart a faltering economy by the government. ie, houses means builders means decorators,plumbers, suppliers etc; = jobs. = lower unemployment figures. well done government . exchange country side for concrete. liketoknow
  • Score: 5

1:05pm Sun 2 Mar 14

brooksider says...

Isn't this the hypocrite who sold his house for a housing estate?
.
Isn't this the hypocrite who sold his house for a housing estate? . brooksider
  • Score: 2

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree