City council error prompts new public consultation

A CITY council error has forced views on multiple occupancy properties to be sought for the second time.

Worcester City Council says a possible mistake appeared in its online consultation which has meant they plan to re-run the public consultation on whether homes in the city should be converted to multiple occupancy.

The error is thought to relate to a question which gave three options; yes, no or don't know, with those choosing 'yes' but adding a comment possibly being placed in the 'don't know' option.

The council will be contacting all previous respondents who supplied their contact details.

“I want to apologise to everyone who completed the original consultation online for the inconvenience that this re-run will cause," said David Blake, service manager for Regeneration and Business Engagement.

"Unfortunately we discovered a possible technical issue which meant the results of the previous consultation may have been unreliable.

"We felt the only fair course of action was to re-run the entire consultation.

“This does, of course, give a further opportunity for the people of Worcester to make their views known on this important subject.”

The consultation, which can be found at worcester.gov.uk/voiceit and at city libraries, will run until Monday, May 12.

The consultation concerns Houses of Multiple Occupancy (HMO), which are homes rented out to several tenants, such as young professionals or students.

The city council last year agreed to make it a requirement for landlords to seek planning permission to convert a normal home into an HMO containing between three and six beds.

City councillors subsequently backed proposals that a property could only be converted into an HMO if, within a 100-metre radius, no more than ten per cent of housing is already classed as HMOs.

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:26am Tue 15 Apr 14

CJH says...

"The error is thought to relate to a question which gave three options; yes, no or don't know, with those choosing 'yes' but adding a comment possibly being placed in the 'don't know' option". Hopeless. Just bl**dy hopeless. And how much has this cost us, the poor long suffering tax payer?
"The error is thought to relate to a question which gave three options; yes, no or don't know, with those choosing 'yes' but adding a comment possibly being placed in the 'don't know' option". Hopeless. Just bl**dy hopeless. And how much has this cost us, the poor long suffering tax payer? CJH
  • Score: 0

6:30am Tue 15 Apr 14

jb says...

Would be interesting to know exactly what the question was that was subject of the 'mistake', cynical old me thinks maybe it just didn't give the answer they wanted?
Would be interesting to know exactly what the question was that was subject of the 'mistake', cynical old me thinks maybe it just didn't give the answer they wanted? jb
  • Score: 4

12:22pm Tue 15 Apr 14

lilboo says...

Can they do ANYTHING right?, last week it was an apology because there was an error on some council tax bills that apparently they can't rectify.......

Said it before, I'll say it again, nothing short of a keystone cops outfit!
Can they do ANYTHING right?, last week it was an apology because there was an error on some council tax bills that apparently they can't rectify....... Said it before, I'll say it again, nothing short of a keystone cops outfit! lilboo
  • Score: 1

2:36pm Tue 15 Apr 14

mauro balbino says...

jb wrote:
Would be interesting to know exactly what the question was that was subject of the 'mistake', cynical old me thinks maybe it just didn't give the answer they wanted?
Yes, indeed, the original question is needed in order to make any sense of how convenient the mistake was or if there was any convenience at all, because despite "Worcester City Council says a possible mistake", there is no doubt a mistake was made at our expense. Hence, I am interested to know which question it was and our WN might help us with it.
[quote][p][bold]jb[/bold] wrote: Would be interesting to know exactly what the question was that was subject of the 'mistake', cynical old me thinks maybe it just didn't give the answer they wanted?[/p][/quote]Yes, indeed, the original question is needed in order to make any sense of how convenient the mistake was or if there was any convenience at all, because despite "Worcester City Council says a possible mistake", there is no doubt a mistake was made at our expense. Hence, I am interested to know which question it was and our WN might help us with it. mauro balbino
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree