Work on Diglis improvement project to begin later this year

Work on Diglis improvement project to begin later this year

Work on Diglis improvement project to begin later this year

First published in News

A SCHEME investing more than £900,000 into sprucing up a large area of green space in the centre of Worcester has been given the go-ahead by city council leaders.

Members of Worcester City Council’s cabinet discussed the Diglis Public Realm Project at a meeting on Tuesday, April 15, where they heard it would involve improving the fencing around the playing fields as well as paths and the children’s playground in the area, which had to be removed last year after becoming extremely run-down.

Cllr Matthew Lamb called it “a very exciting project”.

“It’s going to further enhance the green space of the city of which we are very proud,” he said.

“I think it will compliment our bid to be City of Culture 2021.”

He told the cabinet extensive consultation had been carried out in connection with the plans – which also involve reducing the amount of football pitches in the area from three to two, with the third to be converted to a multi-play space where a range of games and activities can be held.

“We want to enhance and improve the riverside area,” he said.

“The river is a great asset and we often don’t make the most of this.”

Cllr Lamb added the adjacent Cherry Orchard Nature Reserve would be left as it is but outdoor gym equipment would be installed at the park.

“The one thing that still needs to be determined is parking,” he said.

“We like to encourage people to walk and cycle but we recognise that as this area is development it will become more of a focal point for visitors.”

The scheme will be funded by cash from five separate Section 106 agreements from developments around the city which council members discovered was available after the former Conservative administration was ousted last year.

Cllr Lynn Denham said she was delighted progress was being made on the project.

“I recognise that in my ward we have constant building work and road works without any community work – that’s what these funds are meant for,” she said.

“We know some of these funds go back to 2004 and in fact they would have been lost if they had not been used.

“I’m appalled that the previous administration allowed the playground to deteriorate to the point where it had to be removed last year when we now know there was so much in the pot.”

The scheme also involves setting up a toilet at the site for use by the Worcester and District Model Engineers, who run model trains from the site once a month in the summer months.

The work is expected to begin later this year.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:15pm Thu 17 Apr 14

gmoore1207 says...

complete waste of money people are being put out of work get priorities right this council is a waste of space
complete waste of money people are being put out of work get priorities right this council is a waste of space gmoore1207
  • Score: 0

3:17pm Thu 17 Apr 14

Raniator says...

gmoore1207 wrote:
complete waste of money people are being put out of work get priorities right this council is a waste of space
Do you live in Worcester? If so, why so unhappy to see it improved? Do you even understand where the money for improvement schemes comes from? No, didn't think so...
[quote][p][bold]gmoore1207[/bold] wrote: complete waste of money people are being put out of work get priorities right this council is a waste of space[/p][/quote]Do you live in Worcester? If so, why so unhappy to see it improved? Do you even understand where the money for improvement schemes comes from? No, didn't think so... Raniator
  • Score: 2

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree