Standoff still in who'll run Worcester City Council

Councillor Neil Laurenson, from the Green Party

Councillor Neil Laurenson, from the Green Party

First published in News Worcester News: Tom Edwards by , Political Reporter

THE state of limbo at Worcester City Council could drag on past this weekend – with the man at the heart of the negotiations admitting he cannot make up his mind.

Councillor Neil Laurenson has also revealed how Worcester Green Party has mixed views about which way to go, making his decision all the more difficult.

Your Worcester News can today reveal more developments in the saga, including:

- The city’s Labour leadership, which has been under pressure from some Green activists to do an unprecedented deal with the Tories, has told them it would be “impossible” because the party’s national HQ would not allow it

- Cllr Liz Smith, the city’s lone Lib Dem, went 48 hours without speaking to anyone about the negotiations this week and says she is happy for Cllr Laurenson to ultimately decide the council’s fate, with her own “preference” to back Labour

- The Tory group’s ‘wish list’ and response has been circulated among Green party members so they can rifle through it

Cllr Laurenson, the city’s only Green, says he was still open-minded about which way to go, but is determined to not let it drag on until Tuesday’s crunch full council meeting to vote in a new administration.

“Last year, I got told off for not giving the Conservatives a proper hearing,” he said. “So now I’m doing that and we’ve had talks within the Green Party about what to do.

“I have actually got back a wide range of Green views and for me, it’s about finding common ground.

“It’s annoying people think I’m on a ‘power grab’ because I wouldn’t be in this position if those two (Labour and the Tories) got together.

"But as that’s not going to happen, I don’t want to be here just to make up the numbers, because then what’s the point?”

He said Labour’s leadership, which has no appetite to deal with the Conservatives, had “a directive from London” not to work with the Tories anyway.

Cllr Smith, meanwhile, said: “Technically, my options are still open, but my preference is not to go with the Conservatives. But I haven’t spoken to anyone for 48 hours.”

More negotiations are planned this weekend, with all sides saying they aim to strike a deal before Tuesday to avoid last-minute chaos.

The Tories have 17 councillors compared to Labour’s 16, meaning they need the support of only one of the lone party politicians to wrestle back control.

The Labour group met on Thursday night and leader Cllr Adrian Gregson said negotiations were still ongoing.

WE WON’T BE ‘HELD TO RANSOM’, SAY TORIES

A FORMER deputy leader of Worcester City Council has fired the Green Party a warning - by insisting the Tories won't be "held to ransom".

Councillor Roger Knight, a veteran Conservative, says any deal they might strike "must be right for the city".

It comes as talks were today due to carry on over the city council's control, with the Tories one councillor short of taking over from Labour.

Cllr Knight, a former cabinet member for the environment, also says he has concerns over Cllr Neil Laurenson wanting to launch a pilot for food waste collections in the city.

He said: "I don't think we should be held to ransom by him and end up agreeing to things we don't want or need in Worcester, like food waste.

"We can't get into a situation where we could be agreeing things just to satisfy him, rather than what we believe is right for Worcester - it must be right for the city."

An investigation into launching food waste collections was launched last year by the Labour administration, but abandoned due to the launch costs being estimated at £1 million.

Cllr Laurenson's wish list of eight topics includes re-visiting the idea by setting up a free, voluntary pilot in a few selected Worcester streets to see if it proves popular.

Cllr Knight also said Councillor Simon Geraghty, Tory group leader, was keeping the Guildhall's 17-strong cohort of Conservatives regularly informed of developments.

FINANCE CHIEF CALLS FOR ‘HONOURABLE’ AGREEMENT

THE man controlling the purse strings at Worcester City Council has called for a "genuine deal" to be struck before Tuesday.

Councillor Richard Boorn, Labour's cabinet member for finance, told your Worcester News any agreement with the city's lone Green must not be "just lip service" for it to succeed.

Councillor Neil Laurenson's wish list has already led to a warning from Worcester's lone Lib Dem, Cllr Liz Smith, that the tight finances must be taken into account.

Cllr Boorn also insists Labour are "considerably closer" to Cllr Laurenson in their views on how to run the city council than the Tories are.

"From my point of view this has to be a genuine deal - whatever we agree must be deliverable, it can't be just lip service," he said.

"I believe we are considerably closer (to Cllr Laurenson) than they are in terms of how we'd run this city.

"What we need to do is come to an honourable agreement."

COUNCIL’S LEADER STILL CONFIDENT

THE leader of Worcester City Council yesterday said he “hoped” a deal can be finalised by Tuesday.

Councillor Adrian Gregson, who is facing a vote of no confidence, said talks over a Lab-Lib-Green agreement were still on.

“We are where we are - we haven’t agreed anything yet but we know decisions have got to be made by Tuesday,” he said.

When asked if he expected to finalise it before then, he said: “I hope so”.

Cllr Gregson, who took over as leader one year ago after a Labour coup, has spent the week embroiled in talks culminating in Thursday’s group meeting.

Your Worcester News can also reveal the Tories are having a group meeting today.

Comments (8)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:52am Sat 31 May 14

Worcester Lad says...

It would be good for Worcester if all parties could work together to make this City a better place
It would be good for Worcester if all parties could work together to make this City a better place Worcester Lad
  • Score: 10

12:13pm Sat 31 May 14

3thinker says...

Worcester Lad wrote:
It would be good for Worcester if all parties could work together to make this City a better place
Agreed. Now is not the time for unnecessary inter party bickering.
[quote][p][bold]Worcester Lad[/bold] wrote: It would be good for Worcester if all parties could work together to make this City a better place[/p][/quote]Agreed. Now is not the time for unnecessary inter party bickering. 3thinker
  • Score: 7

12:40pm Sat 31 May 14

High Time says...

3thinker wrote:
Worcester Lad wrote:
It would be good for Worcester if all parties could work together to make this City a better place
Agreed. Now is not the time for unnecessary inter party bickering.
The Labour Party as been told by head office not to work with the Torys. The boy should not side with either and vote at each meeting after listening to the debate.He should leave the dithering Lib/Dem to side with Labour which would be enough to keep Labour in power with the casting vote of the Mayor.
[quote][p][bold]3thinker[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Worcester Lad[/bold] wrote: It would be good for Worcester if all parties could work together to make this City a better place[/p][/quote]Agreed. Now is not the time for unnecessary inter party bickering.[/p][/quote]The Labour Party as been told by head office not to work with the Torys. The boy should not side with either and vote at each meeting after listening to the debate.He should leave the dithering Lib/Dem to side with Labour which would be enough to keep Labour in power with the casting vote of the Mayor. High Time
  • Score: 3

4:05pm Sat 31 May 14

brooksider says...

High Time wrote:
3thinker wrote:
Worcester Lad wrote:
It would be good for Worcester if all parties could work together to make this City a better place
Agreed. Now is not the time for unnecessary inter party bickering.
The Labour Party as been told by head office not to work with the Torys. The boy should not side with either and vote at each meeting after listening to the debate.He should leave the dithering Lib/Dem to side with Labour which would be enough to keep Labour in power with the casting vote of the Mayor.
I think you'll find neither party will co-operate with the other as their Local Goverment policies are diametrically opposite.
[quote][p][bold]High Time[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]3thinker[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Worcester Lad[/bold] wrote: It would be good for Worcester if all parties could work together to make this City a better place[/p][/quote]Agreed. Now is not the time for unnecessary inter party bickering.[/p][/quote]The Labour Party as been told by head office not to work with the Torys. The boy should not side with either and vote at each meeting after listening to the debate.He should leave the dithering Lib/Dem to side with Labour which would be enough to keep Labour in power with the casting vote of the Mayor.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find neither party will co-operate with the other as their Local Goverment policies are diametrically opposite. brooksider
  • Score: 8

4:25pm Sat 31 May 14

3thinker says...

brooksider wrote:
High Time wrote:
3thinker wrote:
Worcester Lad wrote:
It would be good for Worcester if all parties could work together to make this City a better place
Agreed. Now is not the time for unnecessary inter party bickering.
The Labour Party as been told by head office not to work with the Torys. The boy should not side with either and vote at each meeting after listening to the debate.He should leave the dithering Lib/Dem to side with Labour which would be enough to keep Labour in power with the casting vote of the Mayor.
I think you'll find neither party will co-operate with the other as their Local Goverment policies are diametrically opposite.
Probably the same for the Greens. More in common with Labour than Conservative. I don't know why they are wasting so much time posturing when its obvious who they are closer to in policy terms.

Can't wait until UKIP hold the balance of power and especially as UKIPPERs think policy should be down to the individual of each councillor. What a circus that would be, clowns and all.
[quote][p][bold]brooksider[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]High Time[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]3thinker[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Worcester Lad[/bold] wrote: It would be good for Worcester if all parties could work together to make this City a better place[/p][/quote]Agreed. Now is not the time for unnecessary inter party bickering.[/p][/quote]The Labour Party as been told by head office not to work with the Torys. The boy should not side with either and vote at each meeting after listening to the debate.He should leave the dithering Lib/Dem to side with Labour which would be enough to keep Labour in power with the casting vote of the Mayor.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find neither party will co-operate with the other as their Local Goverment policies are diametrically opposite.[/p][/quote]Probably the same for the Greens. More in common with Labour than Conservative. I don't know why they are wasting so much time posturing when its obvious who they are closer to in policy terms. Can't wait until UKIP hold the balance of power and especially as UKIPPERs think policy should be down to the individual of each councillor. What a circus that would be, clowns and all. 3thinker
  • Score: 0

10:49am Sun 1 Jun 14

willing says...

This is an example of what it's like when Greens get a taste of power...they're like rabbits caught in the headlights of a car. Clueless, and of little use to any Council, when what it needs are Councillors capable of making a decision
This is an example of what it's like when Greens get a taste of power...they're like rabbits caught in the headlights of a car. Clueless, and of little use to any Council, when what it needs are Councillors capable of making a decision willing
  • Score: 5

3:35pm Sun 1 Jun 14

3thinker says...

willing wrote:
This is an example of what it's like when Greens get a taste of power...they're like rabbits caught in the headlights of a car. Clueless, and of little use to any Council, when what it needs are Councillors capable of making a decision
As this was a very predictable outcome it is very surprising that the Greens should not have prepared themselves. Their wish list does look as though its not be well thought through and their changes and dithering makes them look weak.
[quote][p][bold]willing[/bold] wrote: This is an example of what it's like when Greens get a taste of power...they're like rabbits caught in the headlights of a car. Clueless, and of little use to any Council, when what it needs are Councillors capable of making a decision[/p][/quote]As this was a very predictable outcome it is very surprising that the Greens should not have prepared themselves. Their wish list does look as though its not be well thought through and their changes and dithering makes them look weak. 3thinker
  • Score: 8

4:02pm Sun 1 Jun 14

Hwicce says...

3thinker wrote:
brooksider wrote:
High Time wrote:
3thinker wrote:
Worcester Lad wrote:
It would be good for Worcester if all parties could work together to make this City a better place
Agreed. Now is not the time for unnecessary inter party bickering.
The Labour Party as been told by head office not to work with the Torys. The boy should not side with either and vote at each meeting after listening to the debate.He should leave the dithering Lib/Dem to side with Labour which would be enough to keep Labour in power with the casting vote of the Mayor.
I think you'll find neither party will co-operate with the other as their Local Goverment policies are diametrically opposite.
Probably the same for the Greens. More in common with Labour than Conservative. I don't know why they are wasting so much time posturing when its obvious who they are closer to in policy terms.

Can't wait until UKIP hold the balance of power and especially as UKIPPERs think policy should be down to the individual of each councillor. What a circus that would be, clowns and all.
"Can't wait until UKIP hold the balance of power and especially as UKIPPERs think policy should be down to the individual of each councillor. What a circus that would be, clowns and all."

What Councillors voting in the best interests of the people who voted them in, rather than slavishly following some party diktat fro London? You've just won my vote for UKIP next time. Sounds like we might even get Democracy back!
[quote][p][bold]3thinker[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]brooksider[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]High Time[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]3thinker[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Worcester Lad[/bold] wrote: It would be good for Worcester if all parties could work together to make this City a better place[/p][/quote]Agreed. Now is not the time for unnecessary inter party bickering.[/p][/quote]The Labour Party as been told by head office not to work with the Torys. The boy should not side with either and vote at each meeting after listening to the debate.He should leave the dithering Lib/Dem to side with Labour which would be enough to keep Labour in power with the casting vote of the Mayor.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find neither party will co-operate with the other as their Local Goverment policies are diametrically opposite.[/p][/quote]Probably the same for the Greens. More in common with Labour than Conservative. I don't know why they are wasting so much time posturing when its obvious who they are closer to in policy terms. Can't wait until UKIP hold the balance of power and especially as UKIPPERs think policy should be down to the individual of each councillor. What a circus that would be, clowns and all.[/p][/quote]"Can't wait until UKIP hold the balance of power and especially as UKIPPERs think policy should be down to the individual of each councillor. What a circus that would be, clowns and all." What Councillors voting in the best interests of the people who voted them in, rather than slavishly following some party diktat fro London? You've just won my vote for UKIP next time. Sounds like we might even get Democracy back! Hwicce
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree