Former Worcester City Council leader in Living Wage plea

Former Worcester City Council leader in Living Wage plea

Former Worcester City Council leader in Living Wage plea

Former Worcester City Council leader in Living Wage plea

First published in News Worcester News: Tom Edwards by , Political Reporter

A FORMER leader of Worcester City Council has made his own personal plea to carry on paying staff the Living Wage - saying it is "the right thing to do".

Councillor Adrian Gregson, who introduced the in-house minimum pay rate of £7.45-an-hour back in January when he was in charge, told your Worcester News it would be "regressive and counterproductive" to scrap it.

His old Labour administration was booted from office in June after a Conservative coup, and the new leadership says it will not be making any long-term decisions until around Christmas.

Cllr Gregson forced it through during a full council vote, which was backed by the Liberal Democrat and Green parties but not the Conservatives.

As part of the deal it will be reviewed after 12 months, which in this case means January 2015.

The veteran Labour man says it would be "dead hand" economics to revert to the basic minimum wage for the lowest paid.

He said: "Paying employers a living wage is the right thing to do, and what it also does is encourage our contractors to pay the living wage too.

"To go backwards on it would be regressive, counterproductive and all it will do is put more people into poverty."

The pay rise benefited 73 people, including cleaners and temporary workers helping with summer holiday activities.

Councillor Simon Geraghty, the leader, says he will have to take into account "the costs and benefits" before taking a view.

"When we get to December that's the time when we'll be starting to pull together all the issues," he said.

"In terms of the finances there's things like council tax and income sources like planning fees, parking revenues, because for an authority like Worcester these are all very important to the budget."

The pay rise by Labour will cost taxpayers £25,000 this year.

The Living Wage is calculated by a panel of academics, and differs from the £6.31-an-hour minimum wage in that employers have no legal obligation to pay it.

Scores of town halls around the UK have now agreed to opt for the Living Wage, but not at Worcestershire County Council, where it was rejected last year on the grounds of costs.

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

2:02am Sat 9 Aug 14

Perfman says...

based on a rough population of 97045 (WCC) and an average 4 per household, this is only £1 per Council Tax bill - LIARbour have already raised more than that with their increase on the 2014 bill. No issue here then!
based on a rough population of 97045 (WCC) and an average 4 per household, this is only £1 per Council Tax bill - LIARbour have already raised more than that with their increase on the 2014 bill. No issue here then! Perfman
  • Score: 1

8:54am Sun 10 Aug 14

voledog says...

Low wages mean more benefits payments for those unable to afford to live in modern Britain. A huge amount of the taxes we pay go into providing benefits that are paid to just top up poor wages.
We have large corporations, like Amazon, and those providing privatised care for our sick and elderly, like Care UK, basing themselves in Luxembourg and other low tax countries to avoid paying corporation tax here while they continue to pay minimum wages that have to be topped us by those of us who do pay all our taxes. Far more benefits are paid out to low paid workers than are paid out to the unemployed, that is wrong and is complete madness. Closing tax loopholes and paying everyone at least the working wage could actually mean less tax for the rest of us in the long term. Our local authorities should pay a working wage, as should every employer. Well done Adrian Gregson for taking a stand.
And by the way, I employ 15 people so I do know that paying people properly is affordable and is beneficial for a business too.
Low wages mean more benefits payments for those unable to afford to live in modern Britain. A huge amount of the taxes we pay go into providing benefits that are paid to just top up poor wages. We have large corporations, like Amazon, and those providing privatised care for our sick and elderly, like Care UK, basing themselves in Luxembourg and other low tax countries to avoid paying corporation tax here while they continue to pay minimum wages that have to be topped us by those of us who do pay all our taxes. Far more benefits are paid out to low paid workers than are paid out to the unemployed, that is wrong and is complete madness. Closing tax loopholes and paying everyone at least the working wage could actually mean less tax for the rest of us in the long term. Our local authorities should pay a working wage, as should every employer. Well done Adrian Gregson for taking a stand. And by the way, I employ 15 people so I do know that paying people properly is affordable and is beneficial for a business too. voledog
  • Score: -1

10:12am Mon 11 Aug 14

green49 says...

Councillor Simon Geraghty, the leader, says he will have to take into account "the costs and benefits" before taking a view.

The pay rise by Labour will cost taxpayers £25,000 this year.

Thats about what Gerahty claimed in expenses isnt it?
Councillor Simon Geraghty, the leader, says he will have to take into account "the costs and benefits" before taking a view. The pay rise by Labour will cost taxpayers £25,000 this year. Thats about what Gerahty claimed in expenses isnt it? green49
  • Score: -2

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree