News RSS Feed


send_pics

Council workers parking perk

7:43am Monday 28th January 2008

comment Comments (28)   Have your say »


HUNDREDS of Worcester city council workers face a rise in car parking charges this spring as part of budget saving - but they will still be paying a fraction of the cost paid by ordinary folk.

The parking perk means 289 council workers pay £60 a year to park in some city car parks, 41 pay £120 a year and 30 councillors pay £24 a year.

However, ordinary drivers have to fork out up to £6 a day to park for eight hours in the same city centre car parks, which works out at £1,410 a year - assuming they took five weeks' holiday.

The cut-price parking for council staff has angered some drivers, but city council chief executive David Wareing defended the scheme.

He said it is mainly used by workers using cars for council business, and budget proposals, if agreed, would mean the amount they pay would double from April.

One Worcester driver, Paul Curtis, was annoyed to discover about 50 cars clogging up some of the "best" spots in the car park on the former cattle market.

Mr Curtis, of Laxton Avenue, off Monarch Drive, said he noticed rows of cars displaying council stickers after being forced to park on the outskirts of the car park.

"All the people with stickers park up near the exits," he said. "Obviously, the city council is not bothered that the paying public has to park further away, and if the car park is full we can't get in.

"I think they should keep the Butts for people who are shopping and bringing trade into the town."

Mr Wareing said: "I think you could argue it should not be a free perk, but whether we should charge our staff market rate is a matter of debate."

"We are an employer and, like a lot of employers, we would wish to provide car parking facilities if we can.

"We have to use public car parks because all of our car parking is public."

He said workers did not have a staff restaurant, private health schemes or life insurance, and called parking one of "not many" benefits enjoyed by staff.

However, he conceded the issue of staff clogging car parks should be dealt with during the review.

Staff are not allowed to use the stickers while on leave, at weekends or public holidays and they cannot be used by family members.

Worcester City Council is facing a £1.6 million budget gap this year and needs to make cuts.

Bev Kittle, Worcester city branch secretary of UNISON, declined to comment.

For £60 a year, staff can park at: Croft Road, The Moors, Pitchcroft, St Martin's Gate, Swanpool Walk, Tallow Hill, Tybridge Street, Newport Street, King Street and, Cattle Market.

For £120 a year, senior staff can also park at Orchard House and the Guildhall.

Staff cannot use the stickers at privately-owned car parks, the park-and-ride or in Clare Street, Commandery Road, Copenhagen Street, Cornmarket or Providence Street.


Your Say YourWorcester News

nigel, worc says...
7:40am Mon 28 Jan 08

It would be interesting to learn how many of the total of 360 members of staff who use this "perk" are actually essential car users?

nigel, worc says...
7:40am Mon 28 Jan 08

It would be interesting to learn how many of the total of 360 members of staff who use this "perk" are actually essential car users?

Peter D, Worcester says...
8:30am Mon 28 Jan 08

P11D - HMRC?

Peter D, Worcester says...
8:30am Mon 28 Jan 08

P11D - HMRC?

humbug, st johns says...
10:01am Mon 28 Jan 08

i have no sympathy for council workers as Nurses and other essential hospital staff have to pay to park at the royal, and thats just in the staff car park!

humbug, st johns says...
10:01am Mon 28 Jan 08

i have no sympathy for council workers as Nurses and other essential hospital staff have to pay to park at the royal, and thats just in the staff car park!

Logik, worcester says...
10:41am Mon 28 Jan 08

Excluding councillors, that's 330 council staff who use their cars daily on council business.(Distinct farmyard smell to this claim)

Makes you wonder who's left in the offices then.


Logik, worcester says...
10:41am Mon 28 Jan 08

Excluding councillors, that's 330 council staff who use their cars daily on council business.(Distinct farmyard smell to this claim)

Makes you wonder who's left in the offices then.


Disbelief, Worcester says...
11:36am Mon 28 Jan 08

So council staff get a perk of cheap parking.......so what?? I get free parking where I work. I think some of the comments on this subject are from people who should get out more.Whatever next??Bus drivers get free travel??

Disbelief, Worcester says...
11:36am Mon 28 Jan 08

So council staff get a perk of cheap parking.......so what?? I get free parking where I work. I think some of the comments on this subject are from people who should get out more.Whatever next??Bus drivers get free travel??

am, Worcester says...
1:21pm Mon 28 Jan 08

Logik wrote:
Excluding councillors, that's 330 council staff who use their cars daily on council business.(Distinct farmyard smell to this claim) Makes you wonder who's left in the offices then.
Problem is Logik that if there are staff in the offices, they don't do anything because they're lazy and useless. Someone i work with used to work for the county council and apparently they spent most of their time on 'site meetings', in the canteen reading magazines etc and surfing the web. I assume the city council isn't much different.

am, Worcester says...
1:21pm Mon 28 Jan 08

Logik wrote:
Excluding councillors, that's 330 council staff who use their cars daily on council business.(Distinct farmyard smell to this claim) Makes you wonder who's left in the offices then.
Problem is Logik that if there are staff in the offices, they don't do anything because they're lazy and useless. Someone i work with used to work for the county council and apparently they spent most of their time on 'site meetings', in the canteen reading magazines etc and surfing the web. I assume the city council isn't much different.

Alan2, Worcester says...
3:04pm Mon 28 Jan 08

Why should Councillors only pay £24 per year. WHY should they be treated differently to anyone else. An outrage that should be stopped immediately. CAN THEY GIVE ONE GOOD REASON TO JUSTIFY IT. Not in my book.

Alan2, Worcester says...
3:04pm Mon 28 Jan 08

Why should Councillors only pay £24 per year. WHY should they be treated differently to anyone else. An outrage that should be stopped immediately. CAN THEY GIVE ONE GOOD REASON TO JUSTIFY IT. Not in my book.

King Creole, Worcester says...
6:46pm Mon 28 Jan 08

It isn't hard to see from the comments above how disgusted our citizens are. Only one gives even vague support and I suspect he/she is the sort who would say black is white just to start an argument.The simple facts are that non council workers have to pay full price to park in town if they work there so why should council employees be subsidised? Perhaps if they had to pay like everybody else they wouldn't bring their cars. That would mean less congestion and less expense because they could use the buses they keep encouraging us to use.

King Creole, Worcester says...
6:46pm Mon 28 Jan 08

It isn't hard to see from the comments above how disgusted our citizens are. Only one gives even vague support and I suspect he/she is the sort who would say black is white just to start an argument.The simple facts are that non council workers have to pay full price to park in town if they work there so why should council employees be subsidised? Perhaps if they had to pay like everybody else they wouldn't bring their cars. That would mean less congestion and less expense because they could use the buses they keep encouraging us to use.

Alan2, Worcester says...
7:29pm Mon 28 Jan 08

Councillors get an expence allowance which many people feel are not justified at all or, are over generous.
Perhaps the Worcester News could ask David Waering WHY Councillors should have car parking facilities for less than 50p per week at all, they are already paid for expences and car parking should be one of them - they should not have both.
Their expences would cover car parking many times over during the year. This is just an insulting con of the electorate and it is a bigger insult to us for David Waering to try and justify it - Councillors must have this perk withdrawn NOW.

Alan2, Worcester says...
7:29pm Mon 28 Jan 08

Councillors get an expence allowance which many people feel are not justified at all or, are over generous.
Perhaps the Worcester News could ask David Waering WHY Councillors should have car parking facilities for less than 50p per week at all, they are already paid for expences and car parking should be one of them - they should not have both.
Their expences would cover car parking many times over during the year. This is just an insulting con of the electorate and it is a bigger insult to us for David Waering to try and justify it - Councillors must have this perk withdrawn NOW.

Logik, worcester says...
9:20pm Mon 28 Jan 08

Someone i work with used to work for the county council and apparently they spent most of their time on 'site meetings', in the canteen reading magazines etc and surfing the web. I assume the city council isn't much different.


Sounds about right AM.

Logik, worcester says...
9:20pm Mon 28 Jan 08

Someone i work with used to work for the county council and apparently they spent most of their time on 'site meetings', in the canteen reading magazines etc and surfing the web. I assume the city council isn't much different.


Sounds about right AM.

am, Worcester says...
9:37pm Mon 28 Jan 08

Alan2 wrote:
Councillors get an expence allowance which many people feel are not justified at all or, are over generous. Perhaps the Worcester News could ask David Waering WHY Councillors should have car parking facilities for less than 50p per week at all, they are already paid for expences and car parking should be one of them - they should not have both. Their expences would cover car parking many times over during the year. This is just an insulting con of the electorate and it is a bigger insult to us for David Waering to try and justify it - Councillors must have this perk withdrawn NOW.
And council workers should have this perk taken away too.

am, Worcester says...
9:37pm Mon 28 Jan 08

Alan2 wrote:
Councillors get an expence allowance which many people feel are not justified at all or, are over generous. Perhaps the Worcester News could ask David Waering WHY Councillors should have car parking facilities for less than 50p per week at all, they are already paid for expences and car parking should be one of them - they should not have both. Their expences would cover car parking many times over during the year. This is just an insulting con of the electorate and it is a bigger insult to us for David Waering to try and justify it - Councillors must have this perk withdrawn NOW.
And council workers should have this perk taken away too.

anon, worcester says...
10:49pm Mon 28 Jan 08

humbug wrote:
i have no sympathy for council workers as Nurses and other essential hospital staff have to pay to park at the royal, and thats just in the staff car park!
well bloody said, all nurses and staff at royal are worth their weight in gold and you have to pay to go to work and save peoples lives, its discusting...

anon, worcester says...
10:49pm Mon 28 Jan 08

humbug wrote:
i have no sympathy for council workers as Nurses and other essential hospital staff have to pay to park at the royal, and thats just in the staff car park!
well bloody said, all nurses and staff at royal are worth their weight in gold and you have to pay to go to work and save peoples lives, its discusting...

Bingo Jim, Worcester says...
8:08am Tue 29 Jan 08

Company offers staff subsidised parking. Shock Horror!

Bingo Jim, Worcester says...
8:08am Tue 29 Jan 08

Company offers staff subsidised parking. Shock Horror!

Private Sector Worker, Kidderminster says...
3:52pm Tue 29 Jan 08

Disbelief wrote:
So council staff get a perk of cheap parking.......so what?? I get free parking where I work. I think some of the comments on this subject are from people who should get out more.Whatever next??Bus drivers get free travel??
You're right, private offices sometimes offer free parking. The only thing I would say is that the parking shoul dbe restricted to Mon - Fri 9-5. Some workers do have to use the car - it is not practical for them to get a bus/train. But the Council would do better in reaching its'green' targets by encouraging the use of the us with reduced cost fares, instead of allowing workers to clog up the car parks. Alternatively, make the spaces over by the racecourse designated council workers spots - I'm sure the extra walking won't harm them!

Private Sector Worker, Kidderminster says...
3:52pm Tue 29 Jan 08

Disbelief wrote:
So council staff get a perk of cheap parking.......so what?? I get free parking where I work. I think some of the comments on this subject are from people who should get out more.Whatever next??Bus drivers get free travel??
You're right, private offices sometimes offer free parking. The only thing I would say is that the parking shoul dbe restricted to Mon - Fri 9-5. Some workers do have to use the car - it is not practical for them to get a bus/train. But the Council would do better in reaching its'green' targets by encouraging the use of the us with reduced cost fares, instead of allowing workers to clog up the car parks. Alternatively, make the spaces over by the racecourse designated council workers spots - I'm sure the extra walking won't harm them!

Comments are closed on this article.

LOCAL ADVERTISERS


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »