News RSS Feed


Send Photo

Family left without a bathroom

6:00pm Sunday 20th July 2008

comment Comments (8)   Have your say »

By Lucy Tatchell »

A FAMILY of seven were left without a bathroom for a week and without a workable kitchen for two months after a Worcester Community Housing blunder.

Adam Talbot and his partner Lisa Burford were excited when their home was ear-marked for the compulsory upgrade scheme.

But builders left a trail of destruction, forcing them to eat out and use the local swimming pool showers, and leaving their home “ruined”.

“They walked into my home and treated it like a builders’ yard but I live here, my home is ruined,” Mr Talbot said. The work started on Monday, April 28, when a demolition team arrived to rip out the kitchen and bathroom.

The couple, who live with their five children in Coventry Avenue, St John’s, Worcester, were told it would take 17 days to complete all the work. They were told the bath would be re-installed on the same day and kitchen plumbed back so they could use it. But after seven days the family were still without a bath.

They had a toilet and basin, but were forced to go to Lower Wick swimming pool every day to use the showers.

Mr Talbot, who works as a steward at Worcestershire Cricket club, used the showers at work.

The kitchen was out of order for two months so they set up a table in their 11-month-old daughter’s bedroom to prepare and sterilise her bottles, and put a microwave in the living room.

Mr Talbot said: “We did have savings we could use, but now I have to explain to my children we cannot have a holiday because all the money we had went on eating out.”

Mr Talbot, aged 38, claims the builders failed to finish jobs, forcing him to take days off work to put them right.

His 31-year-old partner, who works at the Co-op, St John’s, has had to see the doctor due to stress.

Despite raising the issues with Worcester Community Housing (WCH) and building firm Connaught, nothing was done.

After being contacted by your Worcester News, WCH and Connaught staff visited Mr Talbot to discuss the issues.

Stewart Mountfield, WCH chief executive, said: “My sincere apologies to Mr Talbot and his family for the problems they have encountered during their home improvement work.

“Some aspects of the work have taken far too long to complete. We are now working with our contractors and in-house repairs team to make sure the work is completed as quickly as possible.”

Connaught’s partnership manager, Alan Bolton, said they are working to rectify the issues.

Your Say Your Worcester

english1000, Worcester says...
10:43am Mon 21 Jul 08

An all to often issue with WCH and this contractor, but the poor standard of workman ship that's left behind. But WCH just want to close their eye's, when they should insist that the work is of a standard that all agree on, that includes the tenant, after all they have to pay the rent, and that noy cheap.

varien, Worcester says...
5:04pm Mon 21 Jul 08

I hope Mr Talbot and his "partner" have held back some money from the contractor for all the problems that have been caused. Now let me see - zero percent of zero is .....uuummm!!!

Logik, Worcester says...
10:38pm Mon 21 Jul 08

varien wrote:
I hope Mr Talbot and his "partner" have held back some money from the contractor for all the problems that have been caused. Now let me see - zero percent of zero is .....uuummm!!!
I see, this is seemingly a comment that perceives tenants as some sort of free-loading inferior beings who have no right to complain about anything. I don't agree.

varien, Worcester says...
1:09pm Tue 22 Jul 08

Logik,
Did I say they were inferior beings? This is your interpretation which no doubt you have assumed.

New Kid on the Block, Worcester says...
6:29pm Tue 22 Jul 08

If they pay rent then they are paying for these repairs so where does the zero come from?

Logik, Worcester says...
9:21pm Tue 22 Jul 08

Varien, your comment inferred that as they had not paid for these improvements then presumably they should not complain.

I do not see why this should be the case unless you see tenants as inferior to homeowners.

DarrenM, worcester says...
1:36am Wed 23 Jul 08

Logik wrote:
Varien, your comment inferred that as they had not paid for these improvements then presumably they should not complain.

I do not see why this should be the case unless you see tenants as inferior to homeowners.
Indeed - I'm a homeowner - can I have a free kitchen and bathroom please?

varien, Worcester says...
4:15pm Wed 23 Jul 08

C'mon DarrenM. Wait your turn. I'm before you.

Your sayYour Worcester

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Worcester News account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?
Left without a bathroom and kitchen: Clockwise from back: Adam Talbot, Emmie Burford, nine, April Burford, 11, Codie Talbot, two,  Kian Burford, aged Clockwise from back: Adam Talbot, Emmie Burford, nine, April Burford, 11, Codie Talbot, two, Kian Burford, aged seven, Madison Talbot, 12 months.

Hot Jobs


LOCAL ADVERTISERS


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »