News RSS Feed


send_pics

Worcester web war declared?


MORE than 350 years after conflict last engulfed the Faithful City a new battle of Worcester has erupted on the world wide web.

American users of the internet-based encyclopaedia Wikipedia are attempting to claim the name of Worcester as their own.

A growing campaign on the site, which is edited by its users and attracts 684 million users a year, calls for Worcester in the state of Massachusetts (MA), to be recognised as the world’s pre-eminent city of that name.

But Lucy Hodgson, Worcester’s mayor, believes the historical significance of her city settles all arguments.

She said: “Worcester in Massachusetts goes back a long time in United States history but we go back further, to 1189.

“As far as history is concerned we’re first but we share a common bond and while I agree we should be first, Worcester Massachusetts should not be far behind.”

Currently, anyone searching for ‘Worcester’ on Wikipedia is directed to an article about the Faithful City with what is known as a ‘dab link’ to direct readers to a piece about the United States city.

However, many users stateside believe because Worcester, MA, is larger and as its encyclopaedia entry attracts more than 16,900 readers – compared with about 12,000 for the UK article – the situation should be reversed.

One website editor, who calls himself Raime, wrote: “Given that Worcester, MA has about 5,000 more readers than Worcester, UK, it is fairly clear that a vast majority of readers are in fact not seeking the city in Worcestershire.”

However, other editors have sprung to the defence of the Faithful City.

Joshii stated: “If Worcester, MA, was the capital of the state then I would agree to a move but it is just a city with no special status.”

The county town of Worcestershire is favoured by the history books. It became a city in 1621, a half-century before the American settlement was even founded.

Richard Lockett, of Worcester Civic Society, said: “I think it’s a close run thing.

“But when you’re looking up Worcester on the internet you should come to the first place to have the name.”

Despite the online row, cultural ties between the two cities are close with the United States city mayor Konstantina Lukes recently issuing a civic proclamation that August should now be Celebrate Worcester Month to strengthen twinning and friendship.

The proclamation is to be personally delivered to Coun Hodgson by All Saints Church choir, currently on a UK tour and who were singing alongside Worcester Cathedral’s choir as part of the Three Choirs Festival this week.



Your Say Your Worcester

sweetlilac, worcester says...
9:15am Mon 11 Aug 08

AMERICANS !!!
Always think they are entitled to everything.
This city of ours was here long before America was even discovered for crying out loud.
There is definite proof of roman origins in 400BC and when was the one is massachusetts created oh yes 1673 by the english named in honour after our city here in england.

Bob Churchill, bob.churchill@gmail.com says...
12:29pm Mon 11 Aug 08

Okay, we have historical significance. But they have a larger number of hits and a bigger population in the present.

Wouldn't a fair compromise be that "Worcester" should land to the Worcester disambiguation page?

Common Sense, Pershore says...
5:43pm Mon 11 Aug 08

Our Worcester was here first - ignore them...perhaps they'll go away!

You can't change history - it's been and gone!

Red Baron, Kempsey, Worcester says...
1:42pm Tue 12 Aug 08

Our CITY - it is not a town as described by the Worcester News article - does have a long and varied history. It should celebrate it more.

Worcester (England) does not need to compete over the number of hits it receives on an American based, web-site which is reknowned for its inaccuracy and lack of attention to detail. It is a public free-for-all and can be edited by those with a registered name on the site.

As those in the United States are desperate to create a false historical record of their significance in the world, they seek to abduct anything that gives them the slightest chance of gaining any credibility.
There are buildings in Worcester England that have stood longer than the United States have existed and before its was "discovered" in 1492!

As a community, the people of Worcester, England, have not and are not best served by those in positions of elected or appointed responsibility.
How many cities have a dual carriage way in the centre that goes nowhere!
Worcester is more than Elgar and Royal Worcester (which isn't made here anymore anyway); neither is it about a music festival every three years.

Let us make something of the fact that King John, who signed the Magna Carta and Prince Arthur, the elder brother of Henry Vlll are both buried in the catedral. The English Civil Wars started and ended at Worcester. Lea & Perrins make their famous sauce here. The BMA was founded here. The list goes on.

Come of citizens of the city of Worcester get onto the Wikipedia site and read about your city and defeat this vain bid by the US to occupy our place in history!








Fishy, Worcester says...
3:36pm Tue 12 Aug 08

I agree Red Baron. The americans took the decision to name their cities after ours. They should face the consequences.

sharkli, says...
5:04pm Tue 12 Aug 08

Come to the King's School on Friday or Saturday at 7.30pm and you can see how the Web has brought the 2 Worcesters together. Severnside Theatre Ensemble and students from Worcester Polytechnic Institute in Massachusetts are performing WITCHWIFE - a musical documentary drama about the Salem Witch Trials.

morty, worcester says...
12:14pm Thu 14 Aug 08

americans are like toddlers, i want, i want!

Your sayYour Worcester

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Worcester News account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.

Mayor Lucy Hodgson balances up the claims Mayor Lucy Hodgson balances up the claims

LOCAL ADVERTISERS