Send your pics, videos and tip-offs to 80360, starting your message WN NEWS followed by a space. Or email us here »
9:00am Monday 11th August 2008
MORE than 350 years after conflict last engulfed the Faithful City a new battle of Worcester has erupted on the world wide web.
American users of the internet-based encyclopaedia Wikipedia are attempting to claim the name of Worcester as their own.
A growing campaign on the site, which is edited by its users and attracts 684 million users a year, calls for Worcester in the state of Massachusetts (MA), to be recognised as the world’s pre-eminent city of that name.
But Lucy Hodgson, Worcester’s mayor, believes the historical significance of her city settles all arguments.
She said: “Worcester in Massachusetts goes back a long time in United States history but we go back further, to 1189.
“As far as history is concerned we’re first but we share a common bond and while I agree we should be first, Worcester Massachusetts should not be far behind.”
Currently, anyone searching for ‘Worcester’ on Wikipedia is directed to an article about the Faithful City with what is known as a ‘dab link’ to direct readers to a piece about the United States city.
However, many users stateside believe because Worcester, MA, is larger and as its encyclopaedia entry attracts more than 16,900 readers – compared with about 12,000 for the UK article – the situation should be reversed.
One website editor, who calls himself Raime, wrote: “Given that Worcester, MA has about 5,000 more readers than Worcester, UK, it is fairly clear that a vast majority of readers are in fact not seeking the city in Worcestershire.”
However, other editors have sprung to the defence of the Faithful City.
Joshii stated: “If Worcester, MA, was the capital of the state then I would agree to a move but it is just a city with no special status.”
The county town of Worcestershire is favoured by the history books. It became a city in 1621, a half-century before the American settlement was even founded.
Richard Lockett, of Worcester Civic Society, said: “I think it’s a close run thing.
“But when you’re looking up Worcester on the internet you should come to the first place to have the name.”
Despite the online row, cultural ties between the two cities are close with the United States city mayor Konstantina Lukes recently issuing a civic proclamation that August should now be Celebrate Worcester Month to strengthen twinning and friendship.
The proclamation is to be personally delivered to Coun Hodgson by All Saints Church choir, currently on a UK tour and who were singing alongside Worcester Cathedral’s choir as part of the Three Choirs Festival this week.
Bob Churchill, bob.churchill@gmail.com says...
12:29pm Mon 11 Aug 08
Common Sense, Pershore says...
5:43pm Mon 11 Aug 08
Red Baron, Kempsey, Worcester says...
1:42pm Tue 12 Aug 08
Fishy, Worcester says...
3:36pm Tue 12 Aug 08
sharkli, says...
5:04pm Tue 12 Aug 08
morty, worcester says...
12:14pm Thu 14 Aug 08
Add your comment
Register for a FREE Worcester News account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find your next job now In Worcestershire and beyond
Search Now »
Make a date in Worcestershire now!
Search Now »
Worcestershire homes for sale and to let
Search Now »
Cars for sale throughout Worcestershire
Search Now »
sweetlilac, worcester says...
9:15am Mon 11 Aug 08
Always think they are entitled to everything.
This city of ours was here long before America was even discovered for crying out loud.
There is definite proof of roman origins in 400BC and when was the one is massachusetts created oh yes 1673 by the english named in honour after our city here in england.