News RSS Feed


c2f slow
80360 slow
announc slow

Rise in violent offenders escaping criminal charges


THE number of violent offenders escaping criminal charges in the Worcester area has almost doubled in the last four years.

Figures released to your Worcester News under the Freedom of Information Act show the number of people in south Worcestershire given a police caution for violent crimes has risen from 306 in 2004/5 to 566 in 2007/8.

The sharpest increase is in the number of cautions for actual bodily harm (ABH), which rose from 165 in 2004/5 to 250 in 2007/8.

Cautions for assaults without injury also went up over the same period from 38 to 121.

One Worcester solicitor, who asked not to be named, reacted furiously to our revelations.

He said: “I think it is absolutely outrageous. Reading these figures, the more serious offence you commit the more likely you are to be cautioned.

“The police continue to charge petty offending such as begging on a regular basis.

“I wonder how many victims of serious assault or burglary would be happy to know police are cautioning people.

“Whatever the police say it is clearly a funding issue.”

But Detective Chief Inspector Jerry Reakes-Williams, of south Worcestershire police, said many factors were considered before a decision to caution is made. “It would be extremely rare for finance to be one of those considerations – and it would certainly never be the most important consideration for either the police or the CPS (Crown Prosecution Service), which decides on what action to take in more serious instances,” he said.

The figures also show that cautions were given for threat or conspiracy to murder, robbery and rape.

Your Worcester News spoke to the sister of a teenager who says he was attacked by a gang of youths.

Andrew Wardlaw, aged 17, is still waiting for justice after he says he was repeatedly kicked by the gang at Malvern Laser Bowl in Spring Lane North, Malvern, in March this year. He was taken to hospital where he required surgery to re-wire his broken jaw.

His 27-year-old sister Emma Cullen, of Kempsey, near Worcester, said: “A caution is not going to stop people, it is disgusting people are getting cautions for assaults.

“A caution does not mean anything these days, it is just a slap on the wrist.”

Mr Reakes-Williams said reasons for cautions included ages and previous police history of the victim and suspect; seriousness of the offence; the level of violence used; views of the victim; prevalence of the offence in the area; and public interest.

“It is also important to remember when looking at the data provided in response to this Freedom of Information request that you are not necessarily comparing like with like as legislation changes periodically,” he said.

“Drawing conclusions from these statistics without understanding the context and circumstances of individual cases can lead to misinterpretation.

“Each case has to be judged on its merits, although it is not possible to go into individual crime records to provide examples.

“When such statistics as these are published in the public domain, they can - unfortunately - cause the fear of crime to increase and the confidence in the Criminal Justice system to be reduced when neither of these are justified by the facts.”


Your Say Your Worcester

Common Sense, Pershore says...
7:31am Fri 26 Sep 08

I understand Mr.Reakes-Williams explanations, but I don't suppose it could possibly have anything to do with the government telling the police "don't lock them up, unless you really have to, as the prisons and police cells are full up", would it?

chrisnewmanuk, Worcester says...
9:23am Fri 26 Sep 08

The article states that cautions are a slap on the wrist - what it does not state is that a caution is a criminal record and is disclosable on employment application forms and shows up on CRB checks.

jb, worcester says...
10:49am Fri 26 Sep 08

I find the last paragraph of this article very confusing. The DCI states that the publishing of the government statistics cause fear of crime to increase and confidence in the system to reduce - but then says that this is not justified by the facts? The facts are the statistics which have been compiled and published by the government so what exactly are we supposed to believe?

Alan2, Worcester says...
11:22am Fri 26 Sep 08

The fact is that both the Police and the Criminal Justice system is a complete and utter shambles. A few years ago, the mere thought of giving a person a verbal caution for a Section 47 Assault (Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm) would make a coppers blood run cold.
Certainly Common Sense has got a point when he talks about Prison places. The whole system has been dumbed down from the initial arrest stage to disposal and filing of the paperwork. An utter disgrace. Our Police have been indoctrinated to spout the sort of rubbish that this DCI comes out with. They neither know no different, do not know the social consequences of crime and, as far as I can see, when they give a number in response to a report of crime, they couldn't care less.
Only a return to Policing and judicial procedures of 25 years ago will show an improvement in the publics perceptions of the criminal justice and Police system. One things is certain, as long as this Government is in power, that is extremely unlikely, they have caused the problems.

Common Sense, Pershore says...
12:28pm Fri 26 Sep 08

It won't actually matter two-hoots what government is in power, Alan2 - Common Purpose has now taken over and is running this country through their trained representatives.

They can be found in government, the Law (hence the chaos) schools, local government, the HNS (their big success - now with more Chiefs than Indians!)and in fact, in all walks of life.

As my letter in this morning says - "where do we go from here?"

local resident, worcester says...
1:25pm Fri 26 Sep 08

If this means that we cannot expect protection from the police and justice system, does this now mean that ALL OF US can now behave exactly as we want to with no fear of recrimination?

Common Sense, Pershore says...
2:53pm Fri 26 Sep 08

It would certainly appear so, Local Resident!

The police actually, are doing the very best they can, under the guidelines and Laws of the Land.

If the Law is wrong and the Judges give out incorrect sentences, or inappropriate sentences, then that's another issue entirely and it's not fair to lay the blame for that, at the door of the police.

Alan2, Worcester says...
4:46pm Fri 26 Sep 08

It will "matter two hoots" Common Sense, we will wait and see. The pussyfooting around will stop hopefully in about 2 years time. And it is wholly fair to lay part of the blame at the door of the Police. These blogs won'e allow me to say why because I would need to write a book about it. Apart from the detection of serious crime where there are substantial forensics etc at which our Police are one of the best in the world, for general Policing issues our Police are one of the most expensive per officer and one of the scruffiest, least effective in Western developed nations.
The past twenty years has seen the public perception of and regard for the Police slip to the very depths - and for that they only have themselves to blame.

crowquill, Pershore says...
5:24pm Fri 26 Sep 08

We gave up the right ot carry arms in return for a police force and justice system to protect us. They are both now failing in this most basic mandate. It is almost to point now where we could legally claim the right to carry arms for protection.

big fish, worcester says...
5:51pm Fri 26 Sep 08

And they say crime doesnt pay, better off being criminal than a victim, what i want to know is what are the prisons full of cause it aint criminals

jb, worcester says...
6:15pm Fri 26 Sep 08

We already have a two tier policing system, CSO's and regulars. Never seem to hear about Specials anymore. Maybe that's the master plan, to have powerless foot soldiers and put the money into a the more specialised areas.

hotfuzz, Worcestershire says...
11:51am Sat 27 Sep 08

So - from the horse's mouth -

"(cost).....and it would certainly never be the most important consideration for either the police or the CPS (Crown Prosecution Service), which decides on what action to take in more serious instances"

'The figures also show that cautions were given for threat or conspiracy to murder, robbery and rape.' (W.E.N.)

SO - I wonder what the more serious offences are - genocide? - terrorism? - treason?

I keep saying it - it's all about money, performance figures, and desire for JUSTICE!!! (lack of that is).


Your sayYour Worcester

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Worcester News account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.

Rise in violent offenders escaping criminal charges WAITING FOR JUSTICE: Andrew Wardlaw, 17, was repeatedly kicked by a gang of youths.

Rise in violent offenders escaping criminal charges

WAITING FOR JUSTICE: Andrew Wardlaw, 17, was repeatedly kicked by a gang of yobs




LOCAL ADVERTISERS

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »