Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting WN NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
7:10am Monday 9th March 2009 in News
By Jack Blanchard
SKY-HIGH bus fares in the Worcester area have been slammed by council leaders as among the most expensive in the country.
Guildhall bosses have launched a stinging attack on local bus company First, which hiked local fares by up to 10 per cent last summer when petrol prices soared – but have refused to reduce them as oil prices return to previous levels.
A First spokesman has told your Worcester News it has no plans to lower fares, insisting prices are no more expensive than elsewhere and claiming passengers are “more interested in punctuality than fares”. But Worcester City Council leader Simon Geraghty insists prices should come down. “Fares here are actually some of the highest per mile in the country,” he told a cabinet meeting.
“We were not disagreed with when we made that point to First. We all accept fuel went up, but it has come back down and prices haven’t reflected that.”
Single journeys within Worcester city currently cost £1.20 or £1.80. Return bus journeys to any nearby town cost £5.50.
By contrast, a day return by train costs £3.50 to Pershore, £4 to Bromsgrove and £4.50 to Malvern. Labour councillor Roger Berry told a full council meeting: “We pay the highest fares in the West Midlands – and probably western Europe, per mile travelled.
“The time has come to challenge First on their pricing policies – one cannot help thinking they’re taking us for a ride.
“Charges in Redditch are lower, because we don’t have the competition in Worcester to match what they have in Redditch. It seems to me we’re not getting a fair deal.
“Charges are astronomical in Worcester.”
The cost of bus travel is a key issue for city council bosses due to the Government’s concessionary travel scheme, under which the city council has to pay First each time an elderly person makes a free bus journey starting in Worcester.
This means every fare hike is a major drain on already-depleted Guildhall coffers.
“It’s all money we would want to be ploughing back into services,” Coun Geraghty said. “Just as importantly, we are supposed to be encouraging people to get out of their cars and on to the buses.”
The city’s head of finance Grahame Lucas has asked local transport authority Worcestershire County Council to take the issue up with First.
A spokesperson for the county council said it was working with First to improve services, and said: “Part of this process will be a review of the fares and ticketing system in Worcester, to identify ways of enhancing and modernising systems to make bus travel more attractive.”
However, Steve Zancker, First’s commercial director, told your Worcester News local fare prices were not unreasonable.
“I would say the fares we charge in Worcester are not dissimilar to other fares elsewhere,” he said. “I don’t have any exact fare-per-mile information and I don’t know what that claim is based on.”
Mr Zancker said prices would not drop this year, as First buys its fuel a year in advance, and so “does not pay the price you see at the pump”.
He said: “The cost of diesel went up probably 30 per cent last year, but we didn’t put fares up by 30 per cent.”
He insisted last year’s fare rises were in line with the industry, but said the company was revising its plans to put fares up by another five per cent this year “in light of the economic situation”.
Comments(20)
skychip
says...
8:42am Mon 9 Mar 09
robe.rtm.29
says...
9:12am Mon 9 Mar 09
rcro
says...
11:03am Mon 9 Mar 09
BAC
says...
12:04pm Mon 9 Mar 09
Baldrick2708
says...
2:13pm Mon 9 Mar 09
jovialcommonsense
says...
6:19pm Mon 9 Mar 09
big fish
says...
6:26pm Mon 9 Mar 09
Flagman
says...
7:13pm Mon 9 Mar 09
val worcestershire
says...
1:13am Tue 10 Mar 09
val worcestershire
says...
1:14am Tue 10 Mar 09
TmP
says...
7:10am Tue 10 Mar 09
Horatio One
says...
7:31am Tue 10 Mar 09
varien
says...
11:15am Tue 10 Mar 09
robe.rtm.29
says...
3:47pm Tue 10 Mar 09
traveloptimist
says...
5:59pm Tue 10 Mar 09
Logik
says...
8:34pm Tue 10 Mar 09
traveloptimist wrote:Please note that Traveloptomist is a Transport planner in a neighbouring county and therefore he has a vested interest in keeping his ilk in employment to dream up these nutty ideas.
I think the Councillors et al have known about this for a very long time. Worcester's public transport system has serious problems, but you can't force the hand of our incumbent greedy Scottish public transport operator: First Group. You only need to look elsewhere to see what those Scottish transport vultures have done to slowly destroy public transport networks elsewhere (First Great Western, Bristol, the Potteries, Plymouth, Leeds/Bradford, Leicester etc etc) Just looking round on the web, it is clear that First's main aim is to maximise profits to return to its shareholders and manage decline.
We desperately need to attract different bus operators to Worcester to create competition and drive down fares. The only way to do this is to make the network more attractive to competition. This means investment: in bus priority schemes, high quality bus stops and bus shelters, better information, new vehicles, cross-city services and more park and ride sites to generate the demand to ensure bus services are profitable (so the fares don't rise so much!). The City and County Councils, if they work together, can deliver this. Come on Councillors - give us a bus network that this city can be proud of: think big!
traveloptimist
says...
10:00am Wed 11 Mar 09
Logik
says...
5:23pm Wed 11 Mar 09
economist
says...
9:17am Thu 12 Mar 09
Find your next job now In Worcestershire and beyond
Search Now »
Make a date in Worcestershire now!
Search Now »
Worcestershire homes for sale and to let
Search Now »
Cars for sale throughout Worcestershire
Search Now »
em miles says...
7:52am Mon 9 Mar 09