Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting WN NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
7:10am Saturday 23rd May 2009
BELEAGUERED Worcestershire MP Peter Luff has told your Worcester News he simply did not anticipate the media storm which exploded yesterday over his expenses claims.
The Conservative member for Mid-Worcestershire insists he has “a clear conscience” over the catalogue of second home claims listed in your Worcester News and the Daily Telegraph, which made national headlines throughout the day and saw camera crews parked outside his city home. Mr Luff has been criticised for claiming multiple household items for his second home over the past four years, as well as refurbishing both his house in Worcester and his London flat.
There is no suggestion he broke parliamentary rules, but he has offered to pay back a £3,000 redecoration bill.
Speaking exclusively yes- terday to your Worcester News, Mr Luff was asked if he had expected the dreaded call from the Telegraph.
He said: “I didn’t. I had such a clear conscience. But obviously my judgement was wrong, which unnerves me.
“I think I hadn’t appreciated the extent to which the public mood had moved on, and things that would have been tolerated even two or three months ago are now considered not tolerable.
“I think it’s totally right that people judge revelations of today by the standards of today. But I think if I had published this as I went along – as I often thought of doing – I wouldn’t be in the difficulty I’m in today.”
Mr Luff declined to comment on each individual claim he made, but did explain spending almost £1,000 of taxpayers’ money on two sets of china over the four-year period.
He said: “I had used my own china for about 14 years, with no charges to public funds. Eventually I had to buy a new set.
“We bought one and it was inappropriate. It didn’t fit the cupboards, didn’t fit the dishwasher – it was a mistake. So we replaced it So that’s 14 years, two sets of china.”
Asked if he thought the china claims looked bad in retrospect, Mr Luff said: “I do. It’s been picked up by a number of people and.. yes I do.”
Describing the Telegraph coverage as “horrid”, Mr Luff reiterated that “the main allegation” made against him – that he ‘flipped’ his second home designation simply so he could furnish both homes at the taxpayers’ expense – is “absolutely untrue”.
He said: “That’s the major misrepresentation in the piece.”
The MP produced documents showing he became a parliamentary ‘office-holder’ in July 2002 when given the job of Conservative assistant chief whip, requiring him to make his London address his main home. He reverted back when he lost the job in June 2005.
The Tory MP has declined to follow the lead of county MPs Mike Foster and Richard Taylor and turn his expenses forms over to the local press for full publication and analysis. He said: “I’m disappointed I can’t – I had hoped to do so. But until my own party’s (investigation) process has concluded, I’ve been strongly advised I should not.”
Some of Mr Luff's claims
Selection of Mr Luff's second home expenses claims over four years, as listed in the Daily Telegraph: Kitchen table and six chairs – £1,583 (£750 paid out by fees office); TV – £750 Microwave – £218.99; China set – £625; China set – £367; Mattress – £675; DVD player – £224.99; Radio – £148; Clock radio – £116.99; Bedside light, alarm clock radio – £246.75; Chest of drawers – £725; Set of sofas, tables and pouffe – £1,774; Vacuum cleaner – £194.37; Vacuum cleaner – £139; Highgrove bedside chest – £144.93; Dining room table, four chairs, bar stool – £596; Carpet – £1,589.93.
Maggie Would, says...
8:05am Sat 23 May 09
disbelief, wr says...
8:07am Sat 23 May 09
Logik, Worcester says...
8:24am Sat 23 May 09
WorcsPhil, Worcester says...
9:37am Sat 23 May 09
jb, worcester says...
10:40am Sat 23 May 09
TmP, worcester says...
11:05am Sat 23 May 09
BarryB, Worcester says...
12:49pm Sat 23 May 09
Logik, Worcester says...
1:03pm Sat 23 May 09
BarryB wrote:I suppose we'll have to wait for the Daily Telegraph for the full details BarryB on Mr Foster.
It is possible to compare Mr. Luff's claims with those of Michael Foster, why don't some of you do that. You will find that in the last financial year, Michael Foster claimed over £3,000 more for his second home than Peter Luff.
Perhaps we can have the spotlight on Mr Foster because living in his constituency I would like to know before I vote.
economist, Warndon says...
1:28pm Sat 23 May 09
sunseasand, IOW says...
5:26pm Sat 23 May 09
helen donovan, Evesham says...
6:31pm Sat 23 May 09
Harry wilson, Worcestershire says...
7:03pm Sat 23 May 09
trcole, Worcester says...
8:01pm Sat 23 May 09
Cromwell of Worcester, Worcester says...
8:51pm Sat 23 May 09
where'smycounciltaxgoing?, Worcester says...
3:04am Sun 24 May 09
BarryB, Worcester says...
2:47pm Sun 24 May 09
Logik, Worcester says...
6:18pm Sun 24 May 09
Balthazar, London says...
7:32pm Mon 1 Jun 09
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find your next job now In Worcestershire and beyond
Search Now »
Make a date in Worcestershire now!
Search Now »
Worcestershire homes for sale and to let
Search Now »
Cars for sale throughout Worcestershire
Search Now »
TmP, worcester says...
7:53am Sat 23 May 09