News RSS Feed


Solar panels are helping us to save £400 a year


SPECIAL solar panels are helping to not only save a Worcester family money but earn them some extra cash as well.

The Jenkins household is reaping the benefits of having 16 photovoltaic (PV) solar panels installed on the south- facing roof of their home in Hillery Road, Spetchley.

Dad Matthew Jenkins reckons the family save at least £400 every year on their electricity bills.

He said: “When it’s sunny, like it kind of is at the moment, the panels generate electricity. Even on a cloudy day we get a bit.

“On a sunny day we get quite a lot and if we generate more than we’re actually using we export that back onto the national grid.

“We actually get paid for that and get a fair bit of money for it.”

Mr Jenkins, a website designer who runs his business from home, said he used money from his redundancy at Kays to help pay for the PV panels which cost £15,500.

However, that was offset by a £7,000 government grant.

The panels absorb energy from the sun and a converter fitted in the loft of the semi-detached home turns that into electricity that can be used to power lighting and everyday items such as kettles, irons, computers and televisions.

The panels have generated more than 6,160 kw/h since they were installed in October 2006. Mr Jenkins said while it could take up to 20 years before the panels actually pay for themselves it has helped to ease a lot of financial worry for the family.

“It will take quite a long time to get the money back but it’s a long-term investment,” he said. “If the cost of electricity goes up it doesn’t affect us and we will probably get paid more for any extra we generate.

“We don’t have to worry about whether electricity bills are going to go up.”

Mr Jenkins, who lives with his wife Mitra and sons Harrison, aged six, and Anton, three, said the panels have also turned their house into a talking point. “Our road is quite quiet and not many people go past but when they do we often see a few people looking up and pointing at the roof because they look different to other types of panels,” he said.

Mr Jenkins, who recently became a member of the Green Party, is now urging other people to think about installing solar panels on their homes to make Worcester a more environmentally-friendly city.

He said he would be willing to meet people interested in learning more about the PV panels.

He has even set up a website mitrajenkins.org.uk, which records how much energy the solar panels produce every month.

Comments(12)

rgdudley says...
9:57am Sun 28 Jun 09

But you don't say what the lifespan of these panels are. If it's only 20 years then he has only just broken even, if it is less then he's made a loss. And that's with the government paying half!


Logik says...
10:42am Sun 28 Jun 09

rgdudley wrote:
But you don't say what the lifespan of these panels are. If it's only 20 years then he has only just broken even, if it is less then he's made a loss. And that's with the government paying half!

The lifespan is from what I have read 20-25 years. Result, no saving whatsoever.

Typical Greenie, what a waste of time and money.

chrisnewmanuk says...
11:08am Sun 28 Jun 09

Even if this only breaks even, the cash flow of their bank account will be much healthier - effectively giving them more disposable income month on month. Given the cost of things going up and up all of the time, this cash flow is critical. The flip side of course is that its benefiting the grid. The only problem I had with it was the ridiculous cost. Some chap visited and offered 1 panel+boiler+timing kit etc. (my house is exactly south facing)
and they wanted £11,000. British Gas, same system, wanted £6,500. 4 weeks later I had a letter from the original sales people saying the price had been discounted to £6,900. That's still a fair wedge but if prices come down as the grants take better effect, I would be tempted again.
I found the true payback for me would be about 10 years (only 2 of us) but more over, those who are mad into the Green stuff will think of panels on a house as an asset and a possible reason to buy. Those who aren't bothered will just see it as a money saving exercise.

Common Sense says...
11:54am Sun 28 Jun 09


This is why I love this paper - it's so informative!

Thanks, gentlemen - I shall now make some enquiries about these panels myself.

20 years should see me out - it would put me around 95!

rgdudley says...
11:54am Sun 28 Jun 09

I think you've got rose coloured spectacles on here.

If I asked you to invest in a Building Society account and said at the end of 20 years I would give you your money back, you would think that was a rubbish investment.

These things can't be a good investment or the government wouldn't need to subsidise them.

If you exclude half the costs you could argue that anything is a good investment, in financial market that tends to be called fraud.

uptonX says...
2:17pm Sun 28 Jun 09

Fair play to him, what others have misssed is the pathfinder effect. Paying £15,500 helps the company that makes them develop and improve the technology and so over time they become affordable for all. So what if he doesn't get the money back - you could spend that sort of money on a holiday and have nothing except a suntan to show for it a few weeks later. I am not a greenie at all but micro generation schemes like this are how we will all get a proportion of our power in the future. Well done Mr Jenkins.

Energetic says...
8:46pm Sun 28 Jun 09

Don't believe all that you read here, Common Sense. The first summer they work fine but gradually there builds up a nasty thick biological deposit which can be the devil to remove unless you are a trapeze artist. So not just the amortisation of the capital to consider but also a hefty maintenance bill (unless you work for the BBC and charge it to expenses).

New Kid on the Block says...
9:43pm Sun 28 Jun 09

If the system offered to Chris Newman included a Boiler then it was not a Photo Voltaic panel but a Solar Hot Water system. i.e. It makes hot water not electricity. Thus in most cases it is the gas bill that is reduced unlike this system that reduces the electricity bill.
These can be much more cost effective provided you choose your installer carefully. The payback period can be quite reasonable especially as the price of Gas keeps going up.
If my roof didn't face in exactly the wrong direction I would have considered one when fitting a new boiler. But a roof facing East West is about as wrong as you can get.

topspin says...
12:11pm Mon 29 Jun 09

Matthew Jenkins here. Just reading some of the comments and thought I'd clear up a few issues.

1. Most companies guarantee the pv panels for 20-25 years, but their working lifespan is closer to 60 years, possibly more.
2. They are as close as you can get to zero maintenance.
3. Payback could well be quicker than 20 years. It depends on the cost of electricity (which is likely to rise) and also the amount we get paid for exporting it. Plus, it does add value to our house if we ever thought of selling.
4. Lastly, this is not all about the money and how much it will save us. It's about doing something constructive to slow down the damaging effects of climate change. If more people did this, then the more effect it would have - hence this article.
If you want more information, go to the website mentioned.

Olga says...
2:15pm Mon 29 Jun 09

I'm amazed that people still talk about payback time on this type of investment. If you stick a cash sum into the building society (or wherever) you will be looking for how much return you get (currently diddly-sqat). To make a saving of this type it is worth spending money on and improving ones cash flow - permanently!!
With Eight grand invested you are beating the average return on deposits several times over.
There are no moving or wearing parts, these should still work and have value after we have all snuffed it.
The value is still there (albeit not immediately spendable) a property is worth a noticable amount more for this type of installation. Sadly we don't have these installed at home - my other half has a problem with the physical appearance of them but the recent electricity bills are starting to have an effect on how important looks may not be!!

mcfi5dhc says...
9:19am Tue 30 Jun 09

I too, have solar PV panels on my roof (I live in North Wales). They work, and I am happy with them. I plan to give them a wash with a hosepipe if they ever get dirty, which in the last year or so hasn't happened (this is the only maintenance I'm planning to ever do on them). No one so far has mentioned the UK Feed-In-Tariff, which from April 2010 will guarantee a high rate of payment for those with solar PV and other microgeneration equipment - payback will plummet then. I got the panels to secure my own financial future, though I do like the "green" affect as well. Even if electricity prices double in the near future (which they are predicted to do over the next ten years or so), I shall be immune from the price rise, and so will the author of this article.

independent says...
7:33am Wed 8 Jul 09

The other side of solar is that it's there as a back up, here in Romsley we get electricity cutoffs a bout 5 times a year and lasting 6 polus hours. My small set up of two panles ensures I have electricuty for 10 hours for lighting only and 5 hours for colour television and a few lights. Not a lot but who ants to sit in the dark with candles?..whole set up was less than £300.00. I would lioke to know why the grant is not for the DIY guy??


SUNNY DISPOSITION: Matthew Jenkins is reaping the benefits of having solar panels installed at his home. Picture taken by Nick Toogood. 25246303 SUNNY DISPOSITION: Matthew Jenkins is reaping the benefits of having solar panels installed at his home. Picture taken by Nick Toogood. 25246303

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses