News RSS Feed


send_pics

Bombshell: £45m cuts at county council


MASSIVE cuts of £45 million are to be made by Worcestershire County Council in the next four years.

And County Hall bosses say no service – apart from schools – will be safe from the savage savings.

The county council, which looks after roads, schools, libraries and museums, said it would need to shave the equivalent of 15 per cent off its annual budget between 2011 and 2014.

Council leaders are hoping the first of the “inevitable” cuts can be made next year but warned the figure of £45 million was only “an estimate”.

The council’s 8,000 employees have been told of the plan and department managers were briefed on Friday.

Trish Haines, council chief executive, said that by the end of this week the teaching unions, Unison and the GMB will have discussed the cuts with the council.

But talk about how many jobs could go and where cuts might fall is premature, according to Mrs Haines.

George Lord, council leader, said jobs will go through natural wastage but “compulsory redundancies” will look to be avoided.

A board headed by Coun Adrian Hardman, in charge of County Hall’s finances, and including heads of department, directors of services and Mrs Haines, will spend the next months looking at where savings can be made.

The board will review council services like arts, music and drama provision, look at greater sharing of services with other districts and the city council, under the umbrella of Better Outcomes, Lean Delivery (BOLD) programme.

The parlous state of the nation’s finances is being blamed for the cuts, with officers and councillors expecting a lower revenue grant between 2011 and 2014.

“We want to be ahead of the game,” said council leader George Lord.

“We know the public sector must bear the brunt and act to bring the [national] debt problem down.

“It is relatively easy to hit local government rather than the NHS for example, so we expect that to be the case.”

Council tax will increase in 2010/11 by less than three per cent and then be frozen for the following two years, according to coun Hardman.

That is in line with a national Conservative Party pledge with the Conservative-led council assuming the Tories will win power next year.

Coun Lord said with council tax rises capped at five per cent, savings were the only way to manage a reduced budget.

Coun Hardman added cuts could come sooner than 2011 saying: “We’re sure we’ll have to reduce costs and the sooner we start planning and taking action the more we will preserve services.”

The council believes it has a good track record of savings through “efficiencies” but Mrs Haines admitted finding fresh savings from that route would be “tough”.

Schools, which are funded by Government through the county council, will escape cuts but nothing else has been ruled out.

Savings could however be made through private contract tender for services currently run by the council, including residential care homes for the elderly.

Elsewhere the council will press ahead with shared service programmes although capital spending will suffer, but existing projects like the Worcester Library and History Centre look safe.

Coun Hardman said it “was the last resort to cancel existing [capital] programmes.”

The council has identified “big spend areas” in the budget including adult and community, children’s and environmental services for targeted savings.

The panel, meeting monthly, will focus attention on these areas but “if there’s an opportunity to save then we’ll take it - we’re ruling nothing out,” added Ms Haines.


Your Say Your Worcester

brooksider, worcester says...
12:28pm Mon 12 Oct 09

I believe The Worcestershire County Council are using outside companies to advise on budget cutbacks.
Will the County Council publish the costs of employing these advisors and also explain why the Council does not have any staff competent enough to perform this review?

skychip, Worcester says...
4:32pm Mon 12 Oct 09

Looking on the inside I feel the smaller issues could be addressed - i.e spending on in-house hospitality which isn't really necessary as most people are on good salaries and do not need free lunches

Energetic, Malvern says...
6:27pm Mon 12 Oct 09

Outside advisors are needed because the priority is to cut managerial posts, hardly a job that can be left to present managers who would prefer to cut services.

People may not need free lunches but cutting these out would deter volunteer advisers who would then request payment of their expenses. There are better ways of saving £45m, all involving cutting of staff and elimination of the many unnecessary internal meetings.

cmot, Worcester says...
7:42pm Mon 12 Oct 09

brooksider wrote:
I believe The Worcestershire County Council are using outside companies to advise on budget cutbacks. Will the County Council publish the costs of employing these advisors and also explain why the Council does not have any staff competent enough to perform this review?
Good salaries? More like OTT salaries. I mean, the Chief Executive gets paid more than the PM while the council`s other directors are on over £100k. And the main workforce are probably earning on average £25-30k per annum. Get rid of the deadwood and underworked, which will also lead to cheaper overheads and cut their salaries. This will not only equate to savings but also make ths council a lean and efficient authority. Not to mention the benefit of actually seeing council workers work!

New Kid on the Block, Worcester says...
8:11pm Mon 12 Oct 09

Please cmot can you tell us the basis for your claim that "the main workforce are probably earning on average £25-30k per annum" Because unless there have been some huge pay rises since I left County Hall that is a considerable over estimate.
As for "the benefit of seeing council workers work" I used to see that every day.
I also used to see time and money getting wasted.
Please don't tar everyone with the same brush. Like most organisations County Hall has a mixture of staff some capable and hard working others not so good.

Tattybojangles, worcester says...
8:34am Tue 13 Oct 09

Ok so we can see cuts in services for vulnerable people but its ok cuz we still get a libarary.
I wonder if councillors will be giving themselves an exorbitant payrise again this year?

rgdudley, Worcester says...
8:57am Tue 13 Oct 09

If we are to have a 15% cut then are they going to reduce the number of Councillors by 15%? That would be a good saving.
.
Also a lot of Councils have a high level of uncollected debt, what is the outstanding for Worcestershire and what are they doing about collecting it?

Maggie Would, says...
8:20pm Wed 14 Oct 09

Tattybojangles wrote:
Ok so we can see cuts in services for vulnerable people but its ok cuz we still get a libarary. I wonder if councillors will be giving themselves an exorbitant payrise again this year?
Er - councillors don't get paid. Or pay rises.

Dereck, Fernhill Heath says...
6:19pm Tue 17 Nov 09

But Councillors do get fixed expenses for attending Meetings which usually means holding several Committee meetings on the same night with some lasting 5 minutes but still giving Councillors their 'expenses' for each meeting. Not bad reward - getting paid perhaps four lots of 'expenses' for thirty minutes in the Chamber !
Will they be upping this ' attendance allowance ?'

Your sayYour Worcester

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Worcester News account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.

£45m CUTBACKS: County Hall. £45m CUTBACKS: County Hall.

LOCAL ADVERTISERS