News RSS Feed


I’ll lie in front of wrecking crews, pledges man, 84


THE owner of a landmark listed farmhouse on the outskirts of Worcester has vowed to lie down in front of bulldozers to prevent the proposed north-west link road being built on his land.

Halcrow’s report says its preference is for the completed ring road around Worcester to link up with the A449 at Claines.

That would mean demolishing Oak Farm, just off Claines roundabout, and while the council has denied that is what it is looking to do, owner Peter Sansome said no amount of money could force him to sell the home which has been in his family since 1876.

The Halcrow report says: “West of Bevere, at Claines roundabout, a grade two listed farmhouse of the early 19th century would need to be demolished.”

Mr Sansome, who also owns 20 acres of land, said he had not even heard about such plans until your Worcester News contacted him yesterday.

“This place means everything to me,” said the 84-year-old who has lived in the house all his life. “I’m absolutely devastated. It has shaken me up.

“If they offered me £50 million to sell I wouldn’t. If the bulldozers came, I would lie down in front of them. I have always been here and always will be.”

Mr Sansome said six generations had lived on Oak Farm. He eventually bought it in 1982 and said he had been approached to sell up a number of times since.

Mr Sansome’s brother Harry, who owns neighbouring farmland, said: “If they wanted to demolish Oak Farm, they would be up against the whole parish.”

Councillor Derek Prodger, cabinet member for transport and safe environment, said in a statement: “It is important to stress that all references to individual properties and land in this report are completely hypothetical and are included to enable a clearer understanding of the wider highways options only.

“They are not proposals under consideration. The strategy has been developed to support the vision for Worcestershire and deal with existing and future challenges that we may face.

“We are committed to the consultation on this strategy and only once has this been completed will we begin to conduct a more technical assessment. I want to reassure people that no specific options are agreed or even preferred, that no properties are included in any plans and that we are committed to listening to the public during this important consultation period.

“I appreciate that seeing reference to specific property can be alarming and we apologise for concerns this may have caused.”

• Please read our story about the two proposed routes here then vote in our poll below to indicate your preference.

Comments(16)

rgdudley says...
9:09am Wed 10 Feb 10

It would probably be a better design to move the new connection slightly up the A449 towards Kidderminster.
.
Apart from avoiding this house, large roundabouts with many junctions (this would have 5) always cause problems. It would be better to have two roundabouts, the new one with 3 (maybe 4 if you include egg lane) connections and the existing one as it is.

MrStJohns says...
9:11am Wed 10 Feb 10

I certainly support the development of a better road system around Worcester and I don’t agree with the ‘no’ attitude of claines residents which crops up time and time again. However id plead with the council to build the road without knocking down this listed farm house, im sure it could be left standing with a little thought. see rg dudley has already come up with a viable alternative

High Time says...
9:20am Wed 10 Feb 10

Having read about the suggested route for the new by pass, I have noticed that there are no planns to build a shrine to the great god, the car.

skychip says...
9:48am Wed 10 Feb 10

Although perhaps a good idea to build the link road, I do feel sorry for people whose lives are affected by it - namely demolishing a house that someone has lived in for so many years. Very stressful for the gentleman concerned.

Brian Hunt says...
10:52am Wed 10 Feb 10

Yes dispite the objections and tales of woe this ring road has to be completed. The motor car whether propelled by one fuel or another is here for a great number of years, until free, reliable, frequent, public transport is available. As to the quotes of "I wouldn't move for £50millions" well they won't be offering this but anyway bet he would move for that ammount of money.
Looking on the light side if Mr Sansome were to lie down in the road perhaps he would become a speed deterrant, (Bump). lol

Malvern says...
12:46pm Wed 10 Feb 10

There's no way he would move for £50 million. He's an old man and obviously loves his home.

pudniw_gib says...
1:12pm Wed 10 Feb 10

It is disgraceful that people can be moved against their will to make way for these sort of projects.
Why does the transport lobby think it is acceptable to blight the landscape and destroy peoples lives and livelihoods?
These people are probably the same types who would object to a wind turbine on a nearby hill.
It is heartless, immoral and despicable.

Drico says...
2:44pm Wed 10 Feb 10

Can I suggest an alternative answer to be added to the Worcester News poll for this story?

How about the "hypothetical" proposal that the home of Councillor DEREK PRODGER is demolished in order that all new ring roads, bus lanes and double yellow line systems may be re-routed through HIS back garden / door step, and we see how HE likes it when he reads about it in the local press???

It would be interesting to see how many people would vote for this...

I cannot imagine how distressing this must be for Mr Sansome and I am sure he will receive plenty of support from local people.

raq says...
3:01pm Wed 10 Feb 10

Drico wrote:
Can I suggest an alternative answer to be added to the Worcester News poll for this story? How about the "hypothetical" proposal that the home of Councillor DEREK PRODGER is demolished in order that all new ring roads, bus lanes and double yellow line systems may be re-routed through HIS back garden / door step, and we see how HE likes it when he reads about it in the local press??? It would be interesting to see how many people would vote for this... I cannot imagine how distressing this must be for Mr Sansome and I am sure he will receive plenty of support from local people.
Well said, I would vote for that!

crowquill says...
3:11pm Wed 10 Feb 10

Given the amount of open space around this property only worcester council would come up with a plan to run through a listed building just to join an already inadequate busy roundabout!

Brian Hunt says...
4:30pm Wed 10 Feb 10

Well I here the objectors, but as said the Claines issue has long stopped the Worcester (population almost 100,000) By-pass. So yes I hear shame and woe but this road has to be built and needs to link, thats the word link, into the northern link road and the motorway. And yes they are goung to build more houses. Because for some years and different governments the forward planning has been drastically wrong. And each time there has been the need for expansion the same cry goes up, NIMBY, or poor sole or listed Bats or a colony of Slow Worms. It needs local and central government to get on with the job in hand, there are too many enquiries stiffling this nation.

cmot says...
5:46pm Wed 10 Feb 10

Well done to the Worcester News for exposing the truth about the north-west link, which appears to have been kept secret from the public since last April by those devious, secretive and untrustworthy council officers who are paid to be open, transparent and deliver services to the public.
How long were council officers going to keep this under wraps before springing the plans on us moments before committing to going ahead? Their attitude and approach towards this major scheme has been disgraceful, particularly as the owner of the house planned for demolishing only found out from the Worcester News. These officers should hold their heads in disgrace and be named and shamed for their behaviour.

TmP says...
6:11pm Wed 10 Feb 10

As Mr. Prodger says at the moment it is hypothetical and I must point this proposal has been hypothetical for the past 30 years. My sympathy is with Mr. Sansome it beggars belief that this gentleman did not know of the proposals until this week! rgdudley seems to have a better senario to the problem.

it's_true says...
9:25am Thu 11 Feb 10

This whole discussion is totally missing the point again. Rather then building a "perfect" ring road so that traffic can flow freely (where to please?) we should focus on moving away from individual car travel, build better train networks, cycle lanes and make our local roads safer. Oil that fuels our cars is running out and we need to think about alternatives fast! A ring road will turn Worcester even more into a dormitory town for Birmingham, with everybody rushing off across destroyed landscapes and empty business premises. Please let us not repeat mistakes like in Warndon again!
Let's invest in Worcester, not to get away form it!

keeneye says...
10:08am Thu 11 Feb 10

Dont agree Its- true, lots of vital commerce thriving on the wardon industrial estates, unfortunately not supported by a very good infrastructure, we are talking about a Ring Road - ring roads dont lead anywhere - get someone to explain to you how it works, cars are going to be with us for a long time yet.

Biggles says...
10:45pm Thu 11 Feb 10

it's_true wrote:
This whole discussion is totally missing the point again. Rather then building a "perfect" ring road so that traffic can flow freely (where to please?) we should focus on moving away from individual car travel, build better train networks, cycle lanes and make our local roads safer. Oil that fuels our cars is running out and we need to think about alternatives fast! A ring road will turn Worcester even more into a dormitory town for Birmingham, with everybody rushing off across destroyed landscapes and empty business premises. Please let us not repeat mistakes like in Warndon again! Let's invest in Worcester, not to get away form it!
You use the bus, trains, do a bit of cycling, walk, whatever is your ideal.

I'll drive thank you very much !


FIGHTING SPIRIT: Peter Sansome, pictured outside Oak Farm, which has been in his family since 1876. Picture by John Anyon. 06423801 FIGHTING SPIRIT: Peter Sansome, pictured outside Oak Farm, which has been in his family since 1876. Picture by John Anyon. 06423801

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses