News RSS Feed


'It's not fair' - city on strike (pic gallery)

SIGN OF THE TIMES: Protesters make their feelings known (48415108) SIGN OF THE TIMES: Protesters make their feelings known (48415108) Buy this photo »

THOUSANDS of striking public sector workers have walked out over what they say are “unfair” pension changes.

Nearly 600 marched through Worcester yesterday as 30 unions combined for a one-day strike which shut most of the county’s schools and closed libraries, and disrupted council services.

Healthcare nurses joined 999 police emergency call handlers, probation officers, teachers and others on a protest march through the heart of the city.

At the main rally inside Tramps nightclub, keynote speakers told striking workers they should “be proud to say enough is enough”.

Across the county, many workers whose wages are paid by the taxpayer walked out after negotiations between the unions and Government over public sector pension reform broke down.

Kevin Greenway, of the Public and Commercial Services union, urged the Government to negotiate in good faith while Cabinet Office Secretary Francis Maude said the Government had made workers “a fair and generous offer”.

Mr Greenway said the Government was guilty only of “bullying and intimidation” and had “painted a picture of unions itching for a fight”.

Worcester’s Conservative MP Robin Walker praised workers who turned up for work and said the majority of those not striking would “be mystified that usually dedicated public sector workers are leaving their posts”.

In March public sector workers were told the Government would switch index-linking which keeps pensions in line with inflation from RPI to the CPI measure.

Trades unions estimate this alone would cut members’ pensions by 15 per cent.

But unions only balloted for strikes after the Government proposed public sector workers pay 3.2 per cent more into their pensions every year.

They also want workers to retire later (at 68) and drop the final salary scheme for an average career salary. Unions argue this means “working longer, for less”.

It is “a lie that public sector pensions are unaffordable”, Ian Lawrence, National Association of Probation Officers assistant general secretary told the packed nightclub.

He said striking workers had been made to look “like public enemy number one”.

He also said: “Shame on the Labour Party as well for not backing this action” and said there was “a crisis of political representation” in the UK.

Max Hyde, of the National Union of Teachers national executive, said: “It’s not about pensions, but about fairness.”

She said public sector workers were being made to pay the price for a problem caused by bankers.

“We don’t want equality of misery, we want equality for all public and private sector workers.”

Mr Greenway said unions were “fighting to win” and called for “rolling strikes” if agreement could not be reached.

Unions also rubbished the Government’s attacks over how many union members had voted for strikes, saying it should be compared with the proportion of eligible voters who voted for the Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties at the last election.

Click here for dozens of pictures from the strike.

Comments(8)

Harleyboy says...
11:39am Thu 1 Dec 11

The day of action did not have any effect on me at all, I had blood tests up at the Hospital, there was only two people outside, neither looked as though they had missed a breakfast in their lives. The only people saying this is not a Private sector v Public sector action, are the people in the Public sector! Labour increased the Public sector to make the numbers look good, created debt and now we all have to pay!

Mary79 says...
1:17pm Thu 1 Dec 11

Harleyboy - it was not labour (and I am no supporter of theirs) who created a global economic meltdown it was the banks, albeit with help from all global governments mainly on the right, and the tories were not exactly shouting about bank regulation were they (probably due to their close links)? Banks get bailed out by us, then now in the eurozone crisis they stand to make even yet more money on interest from further bail outs. You couldn't make this up.

Just think about that..they are still making money, bonuses are up, back to their old ways...yet you think we ALL have to pay - sorry but only some of us are paying and it is not the rich and I do not include public sector workers in that 'rich' bracket when it seems most earn less than £16,000 per year.

That might be a bit too much for your self-obsessed mind to understand.

I also don't suppose that if the strikers manage to achieve some kind of victory that is FAIR on everyone, and that I think is their point, anyone not taking part in the strike who works in the public sector will say 'no thanks, I will settle for the original deal the government offered me'.

The government should spend more time tackling the people who caused this problem, the bankers and tax dodgers, not the low paid in the public or private sector who are paying the true price.

I wouldn't be surprised if the government's next move is to scrap the minimum wage to get the 'economy' moving on top of attacking workers rights. Traditional Tory values, that is what we have, up the rich, down with the poor, the latest information about the wealth gap proves it - we are back to a divide not seen since Victorian times; a divide that spawned trade unions and that should tell you everything.

Harleyboy says...
3:18pm Thu 1 Dec 11

So the bankers and tax dodgers caused the problem, what was Gordon Brown doing? selling Gold, robbing our Pensions, and letting MP screw us Taxpayers on expenses. But he did no wrong! anybody seen him lately ? We need a steady ship and credibility, the coalition can achive that, the union fat cats can't.

Emma Lou says...
3:55pm Thu 1 Dec 11

Unless you're a public sector worker, then you don't know what it's like. I live with one, and the things she has to put up with are appalling. ITS NOT AS BLACK AND WHITE AS YOU ASSUME. The hours asked of her to work for nothing, the increasing tasks put on her that she is NOT qualified for in order for the council to save money, the abuse suffered from the public who complain because everything is NOT perfect or delayed because of staff cuts, the list is endless.

Imagine being asked to do the jobs of several people in the same time it takes you to do your own, due to said staff cuts, have to suffer complaints from upper management and the public because you're only human and can't do a million things at once.

Imagine dealing with groups of antisocial teens who won't behave, yet you can't be seen to tell them to be quiet or ask them to leave because you have to be seen to be diplomatic and helpful.

Further imagine having to deal with drunks who use your building as a daytime camping ground, and whom upset other patrons and refuse to leave when asked.

Then there's the backlog of everything that's mounting up because of (again) staff cuts, people shouting about that etc etc ad infinitum, ad nauseum.

Oh and they're also supposed to look after and tutor special needs people, again entirely unqualified, and if they refuse on the grounds that they don't want to end up doing something wrong to upset the person, they are told they have no choice.

Have I mentioned the list is endless?

And that's part of being a library assistant now. These people are hardworking and often using heroes, and you lot think they're slacking and just want to take the mickey. They aren't.

Shut UP.

Landy44 says...
3:58pm Thu 1 Dec 11

@Hayleyboy & Mary79

I think you've both got pretty good points here, but it's funny how the economic crash can set people on such emotional opposing views, that encourages us to oversee what has really gone on.

Yes some of the banks clearly behaved badly, but there job is to generate wealth and that requires some risk taking (I grant you they took it way too far), HOWEVER, the crash in itself would have been easier to weather if the previous government hadn't run up a huge "credit card bill" on our behalf. On top of that they then (on our behalf) decided to prop up the banks!
Were Labour culpable - absolutely. Can the current coallition resolve it? Well I think they made a promising start, but from what I've seen recently, they are heading down the same road as Labour, spending money we don't have.

Now I'd class myself as a capitalist libertarian. If I started a business and it was successful I'd expect to enjoy the rewards. If I started a business and failed, I'd expect to be deep "in it". Propping up banks that would otherwise fail is not a sensible course of action.

But there is a third group of people to blame. The British public - who were themselves for the most part asleep at the wheel, in a credit driven spending frenzy, too apathetic to vote.

When we can all stop blaming "someone else" for our personal and countrywide situations, we can begin the process of rebuilding - starting with finding someone from somewhere who can effective manage the finances of the country so our children and their children can have a country to live in.

Mary79 says...
4:01pm Thu 1 Dec 11

Harleyboy,
Individual MP's have to take their own personal repsonsibility for the MP expenses scandal in ALL parties, that is a totally irrelevent point you make about it being Gordon Brown's fault - all party leaders and individuals have to shoulder the blame for it in a flawed system introduced by one Margaret Thatcher - a Tory - to avoid the issue of a proper re-assesment of MP's salaries.

I never said Labour was blameless but neither are the Tories given they didn't shout about wanting regulation either, and still don't - prefering to blame anyone but the bankers and corporate taxdodgers who largely caused it, and the Tories are up to their necks in it with the Banks, just bother go looking how many of them have Banking connections. Please go and get some perspective.

And if you sincerely believe the mainly Tory (coalition) has the policies and combined intellect to get us out of a mess caused by the type of economic and global policies they (Tories) actually helped create in the 1980's and no Government since has seen fit to address, you are totally deluded (go check Cameron's part in Black Wednesday).

Unemployment is up, debt is up by £100 billion, economy failing, zero growth, inflation rising, no business confidence.

Sorry, but the coalition simply do not know what they are doing and they are part of the problem.

We need a totally new and radical approach to national and global economics that no voter is prepared to accept right now let alone the major parties, so we will just go in circles with the same problems only getting bigger each time. Capitalism will eventually eat itself and us.

At least the TUC put forward an alternative earlier this year, though not perfect it is a dman sight better than whate we have right now. The clock is ticking on this coalition and it's getting quicker.

timevans says...
4:35pm Thu 1 Dec 11

So many opinions on the rights and wrongs of it. But the fact is, its not the Government paying these pensions its the Taxpayer as we've now maxed our credit limit. The Taxpayer cant pay & wont pay.

Landy44 says...
4:39pm Thu 1 Dec 11

@timevans

Completely agree with you. Only wish we could say "can't and won't" but the government hold the strings to our purse! I wish it wasn't so!

Local Businesses

Most popular