News RSS Feed


Cabbies fail checks in joint sting

Cabbies fail checks in joint sting Cabbies fail checks in joint sting

NEARLY half of all cabbies stopped during a sting operation in Malvern were driving vehicles that would have failed an MOT.

The random checks were carried out in the town centre last Friday night and revealed a range of problems including bald tyres, split seatbelts, broken lights and suspension coil springs.

Of the 16 vehicles stopped, seven were served with prohibition notices by the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (Vosa) which means that nearly half – 44 per cent – had problems so serious they needed a new MOT.

The checks were carried out by licensing officers from Worcestershire Regulatory Services licensing team, West Mercia Police and Vosa in a joint operation aimed at maintaining high standards among the town’s licensed hackney carriages and private hire vehicles.

Mark Kay, licensing manager for Worcestershire Regulatory Services, said the operation was well received by the taxi trade.

“Most taxi drivers in the town operate legal and safe vehicles and so welcomed the fact that this operation was taking place,” he said.

“Licensed hackney carriages and private hire vehicles play an important role, especially in relation to the night-time economy, but we need to send out a message that the council and partner organisations will not tolerate any breaches in the licensing conditions that could compromise public safety.”

Coun Bronwen Behan, portfolio holder for licensing at Malvern Hills District Council, said: “The public are paying for a service and they have a right to expect a safe and comfortable journey but they are not always best placed to check the condition of a vehicle before getting in to it, particularly at the end of a long night out.”

Sue Penny, aged 56, of Sue’s Taxis and Classic Cabs, said neither her or son Mark, 36, were stopped.

Mrs Penny said: “I think it’s a very good idea that the cars are regularly inspected to keep them up to scratch.

"I can’t understand how so many failed their test because they’re usually so vigilant.”

Comments(8)

uptonX says...
1:11pm Thu 9 Feb 12

More checks please, 44% failure is scary, those driving taxis with faults should be prosecuted.

batchelorboy says...
1:31pm Thu 9 Feb 12

Broken lights? As a broken light is an MOT failure, wouldn't that render that car 'unroadworthy' which would in turn render their insurance void? How many taxis were seized?

davidpdavies says...
1:40pm Thu 9 Feb 12

perhaps a 6 monthly road worthy check is called for,after all taxis do more miles than the average car driver. Im sure any good reputable firm would pay a fee to know that their customers were safe and were not just thinking on the profits they were making

disbelief says...
3:17pm Thu 9 Feb 12

davidpdavies wrote:
perhaps a 6 monthly road worthy check is called for,after all taxis do more miles than the average car driver. Im sure any good reputable firm would pay a fee to know that their customers were safe and were not just thinking on the profits they were making
Mark Kay, licensing manager for Worcestershire Regulatory Services, said the operation was well received by the taxi trade.

“Most taxi drivers in the town operate legal and safe vehicles and so welcomed the fact that this operation was taking place,” he said.

No Mr Kay they do not......44% is a frightening figure. It needs sorting and quick.

mayall8808 says...
4:33pm Thu 9 Feb 12

When ive followed taxis at night there are so many with lights out and some drivers dont look old enough to be in a drivers seat? 44% is what it is, disgusting considering the public are paying to be transported in a safe vehicle.

Biggles says...
5:09pm Thu 9 Feb 12

batchelorboy wrote:
Broken lights? As a broken light is an MOT failure, wouldn't that render that car 'unroadworthy' which would in turn render their insurance void? How many taxis were seized?
No in answer to your insurance question !
.
Although if you've a half decent car, it will annoying tell you ........ constantly........ if you have a bulb out.
.
I'm surprised by the findings (not that I ever use taxis), as they should have so much to lose by their car failing rather basic checks.
.
Maybe our licensing authority needs to start using its teeth !

New Kid on the Block says...
6:08pm Thu 9 Feb 12

I have used Malvern based Taxis a few times. They have always seemed to be much newer and better maintained than those I have used in Worcester.
This makes me wonder, What would be the failure rate in Worcester?

Jabbadad says...
1:25am Fri 10 Feb 12

No matter what the outcome, the licensing committee in Worcester shows a complete failure in any control over the Taxis (over which supposedly they do have control ha ha) helped or rather not prevented by the lack of action from our Traffic Wardens, who I witness many times sauntering past the illegally parked taxis who are over-ranking, parked on the footpath and Double yellow lines, actually parked in the disabled bays on the cross, parked in the Bust Stop in the Tything, then they (traffic wardens) will stick a ticket on a visitors car showing a Blue Badge which happens to be in an unoccupied loading bay. The information on Blue badge parking is now to be contained with the new Badge registration documents, But Are STILL NOT shown on the signs. Even though the signs are confusing a council licensing spokes said that the signs comply with the legal requirements. Personally I think that statements stinks and could be another method to ticket disabled Blue Badge holders to increase the huge takings for the Council through it's traffic wardens, who of course would get loads more fines in if they dared to address the illegally parked taxis.
BUT WILL THEY?

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree