Head defends school's record on exclusions

JUSTIFIED: Tudor Grange Academy headteacher Claire Maclean JUSTIFIED: Tudor Grange Academy headteacher Claire Maclean

A Worcester academy has defended its exclusion policy after figures showed it had expelled the second highest number of children from any academy in England.

Tudor Grange Academy permanently excluded 15 pupils (or 2.27 per cent of its pupils) in the academic year 2009/10 – the year the academy started.

It means the Bilford Road academy was responsible for removing a third of all the pupils expelled that year from Worcestershire’s secondary schools.

However, school principal Claire Maclean said it was a necessary move after the academy took over from the ailing Elgar Technology College in 2009.

She said: “We never take recourse to a permanent exclusion unless we have come to the end of the road or there has been a very serious incident from which there is no return.

“Unfortunately that was what we faced in the first two years.

“Mark one academies (sponsored) were schools in serious difficulties and that’s what we were dealing with.”

Mrs Maclean said the exclusions were often down to “extreme behaviour.” She also said the local authority had reintroduced 33 children to the school who had previously left Elgar, which was not helpful.

Department for Education figures show the total number of secondary school pupils permanently excluded in Worcestershire for the same academic year – the latest figures available – was 44 or 0.12 per cent of the school population.

Across the county, the majority of pupils were expelled for persistent disruptive behaviour.

There were 14 expelled for physical assaults on other pupils and five expelled for physical assaults on adults.

Unspecified numbers (but less than three) were recorded for verbal abuse or threatening behaviour towards other pupils, verbal abuse towards adults and for drugs or alcohol.

No pupils were excluded in the county for bullying, racist abuse, sexual misconduct, damage or theft.

Mrs Maclean refused to give excluded figures for 2010/11 but said they were also high although only two pupils had been expelled so far this academic year, since September.

However, she denied that the school had tried to improve its results by expelling difficult children.

She said: “The way in which we’ve transformed this school is by focusing on teaching and learning and improving what happens in the classroom.”

She also defended the school’s high level of fixed term exclusions saying the school had a zero tolerance approach to bad behaviour. She said: “We are looking to bringing it down and it is coming down but we won’t focus on just bringing the figures down by lowering our standards.”

The DfE does not publish school-by-school exclusion figures but numbers for Tudor Grange were obtained after a freedom of information request by the Anti Academies Alliance.

Other Worcestershire schools subsequently provided figures voluntarily to your Worcester News.

There were also seven permanent exclusions in the county’s primary schools. There were none in its special schools.

There were also 3,250 (or 4.26 per cent of the schools population) fixed period exclusions for primary, secondary and special schools of which 2,603 were at secondary schools.

Comments(26)

dulon says...
10:17am Thu 8 Mar 12

Good for you Mrs Maclean it is a shame that their parents were not dealt with at the same time.
Unfortunately that is not part of her remit but parental responsibility ought to be on the school curriculum.

ladyD123 says...
11:23am Thu 8 Mar 12

The local authority should have no power to re-instate pupils who have been excluded. Surely the principal of a school should have the ultimate say. I fully support the stance taken by Tudor Grange - disruptive and violent pupils make it very difficult for decent, hard-working students to learn. Surely their needs should be put before those of the bullies and trouble-makers.

tinateabg says...
11:56am Thu 8 Mar 12

Yes, good for you Mrs Maclean. Tudor Grange is a great success. Zero tolerance of bad behaviour is how it should be, then students that want to learn, don't haveto feel threatened and frightened.

Jannus says...
2:00pm Thu 8 Mar 12

If i had a Head like Mrs Maclean, I would go back to teaching. I was achieving the the best results in school, above County and national average with good OFSTED. For asking for support with anti-social behaviour management I was put on competency procedures as my ex-head decreed it was my teaching at fault not his school behaviour management policy. The County will have to farm the disruptive pupils out to the PRU's (short stay schools) which are in a state of collapse as the poor staff cannot cope due to under funding.

What will happen to excluded pupils when OFSTED fail the PRU's?

dulon says...
3:20pm Thu 8 Mar 12

The negative tone of the article suggests that the reporter knows better. Perhaps WN would like to come up with an alternative. At the same time maybe they can tell us how well qualified the reporter is to comment.

varien says...
4:48pm Thu 8 Mar 12

Good - get all the troublemakers out of the school and keep them out. No matter what action is taken to "reform" troublemakers they will still end up as benefit claimants and unemployable.

john wilson says...
5:30pm Thu 8 Mar 12

dulon, I don't think the article is negative. An criticism of the school was made. We have reported it, but given Mrs Maclean lots of space to give a well-argued counterpoint.
Look out for Tudor Grange's Ofsted report in the Worcester News on Saturday.
John Wilson (WN deputy editor)

RosieL says...
8:27pm Thu 8 Mar 12

It is good for schools to expel disruptive and violent pupils but they then make it very difficult for decent, hard-working students to learn at other schools where they are inevitably placed.

I am pleased that the pupils at this school have a better deal, its just a pity Elgar Technology College didnt enjoy the same support and vast sums of money and suffered these pupils being dumped on them from other schools.

lauraloo84 says...
2:45pm Fri 9 Mar 12

i was excluded from school 10 times before i was expelled from my school for good, i had alot of difficulties going on at home and i found it difficult too focus, i was sent too a pupil referal unit in redditch as they dont have many in the worcestershire county, i was there almost 2 years as no school would accept me, in the end i was accepted into a school in redditch but i was certainly not dumped into another school it atchually takes time and can be a lengthly process some schools need to give troubled pupils the help they need ie. guidance councillors or just someone who can volunteer just some spare time too listen too these pupils.

Barney the Parrot says...
9:26pm Fri 9 Mar 12

The chorus of support for the Headteacher above is all very well, but what then happens to the excluded kids? Until society faces up to its underlying problems which are causing the bad behaviour in the first place, every school has to accept its share of pupils with such behaviour, not just dump them outside the school gates for others to pick up, as Tudor Grange seems to be doing. One of the dangers with academies is precisely this kind of "I'm all right, Jack" attitude. This is no way to run a school system.

gemma6 says...
7:30pm Sat 10 Mar 12

Barney the Parrot wrote:
The chorus of support for the Headteacher above is all very well, but what then happens to the excluded kids? Until society faces up to its underlying problems which are causing the bad behaviour in the first place, every school has to accept its share of pupils with such behaviour, not just dump them outside the school gates for others to pick up, as Tudor Grange seems to be doing. One of the dangers with academies is precisely this kind of "I'm all right, Jack" attitude. This is no way to run a school system.
Well said Barney the Parrot

gemma6 says...
7:30pm Sat 10 Mar 12

Barney the Parrot wrote:
The chorus of support for the Headteacher above is all very well, but what then happens to the excluded kids? Until society faces up to its underlying problems which are causing the bad behaviour in the first place, every school has to accept its share of pupils with such behaviour, not just dump them outside the school gates for others to pick up, as Tudor Grange seems to be doing. One of the dangers with academies is precisely this kind of "I'm all right, Jack" attitude. This is no way to run a school system.
Well said Barney the Parrot

laidback says...
7:14am Tue 13 Mar 12

Please explain these "social problems". From my perspective there are unfortunately irresponsible and feckless people that produce children then expect others to raise them.

Barney the Parrot says...
10:56am Tue 13 Mar 12

Well quite, and what's that if not a social problem? Those people didn't grow into inadequate adults overnight or in a vacuum, and there are more of them than there were a generation (let alone two) ago. Instead of simply shrugging our shoulders and accepting that, we need a full national debate about how to respond to it. Meanwhile, Tudor Grange and other schools which behave in the same way should quit tossing their problems into other people's laps and do their bit like everyone else.

Worcesterman says...
7:05am Wed 14 Mar 12

I cannot believe what Barny the Parrot, is writing about.
Go on and blame the Academy, for what they do.
Children go to School to learn, and they do not go to School to be bullied etc. And anyone not conforming to the rules, should learn to behave, or get thrown out.
Who do you think you are? Telling Tudor Grange that they should do their bit, like everyone else.
Perhaps you can tell me who everyone else is, are you one?

Do you go to Tudor Grange, and ask the Headteacher, if you can help these so called problem children.

And now you want a national debate about it, What another Quango?

As far as I can see she is doing a great job, its not the crap School
it used to be, and the children are doing better there.
Can you answer that? no I dont think so.

Barney the Parrot says...
12:15pm Wed 14 Mar 12

Cool your jets, "Worcesterman". Unlike you, I suspect, I've been involved in special educational needs provision in both a professional and a voluntary capacity for the best part of 30 years. The children who get thrown out of one school don't disapear into thin air. They still have to go somewhere, and that means they're added to the roll of other schools. When Tudor Grange or any school carries out a disproportionate number of exclusions, all they're doing is shuffling the problem on to other schools which already have their own to deal with. So forget your cheap kneejerking and start trying to give this very real problem some serious thought.

brooksider says...
1:00pm Wed 14 Mar 12

Barney the Parrot wrote:
Cool your jets, "Worcesterman". Unlike you, I suspect, I've been involved in special educational needs provision in both a professional and a voluntary capacity for the best part of 30 years. The children who get thrown out of one school don't disapear into thin air. They still have to go somewhere, and that means they're added to the roll of other schools. When Tudor Grange or any school carries out a disproportionate number of exclusions, all they're doing is shuffling the problem on to other schools which already have their own to deal with. So forget your cheap kneejerking and start trying to give this very real problem some serious thought.
LOL! Worcesterman asked for that.

Geostar says...
3:51pm Wed 14 Mar 12

Barney the Parrot I'm afraid I disagree with you. It simply is NOT the schools responsibility what happens after a pupil is expelled. Once they have attempted to resolve issues with a problem pupil, to allow the disruption to continue to attend at the expense of others is not acceptable. In my opinion we have problems like this as there appears to be NO acceptance that actions have a consequence, and this is taught my parents. These ferrell children infect socity and schools as no action is taken against them. I say congratulations to Tudor Grange for taking a stance against the 'do gooders' who cry out when they attempt to bring high standards back again. They are allowing children who want to learn to learn. Thats what schools are, places to learn, and they should not have to be responsible for sorting out the mess in our society today. A soft stance has created the issues we have to endure today, the violence, the bullying, the lack of respect, and that behaviour is taught at home. Get to the root of the problem, and treat the symptoms. Its not the schools responsibilty.

Geostar says...
4:08pm Wed 14 Mar 12

To clarify my last sentence before someone picks up on it, what I mean is get to the root of the problem, the cause, which is parents who are not prepared to bring there children up with respect etc and make them accountable for their childs behaviour, but in the meantime the schools can only treat the symptoms of the problem, which are the disruptive children themselves by eventually expelling them when they can do no more!

Barney the Parrot says...
4:23pm Wed 14 Mar 12

Those at least are considered arguments, Geostar, and I certainly agree that schools shouldn't have to solve all of society's problems, but with respect you're missing the point in this instance. The abnormally high number of exclusions in this case suggests very strongly that Tudor Grange's efforts to resolve these problems have not been as thorough as those of most schools, and that's unfair on the other schools in the area who then have to sweep up behind them.

Incidentally the new Chief Inspector, Sir Michael Wilshaw, would disagree with both of us about schools' duties - he has said straight out that it *is* the duty of schools to provide what they don't get at home. I think he's profoundly wrong about that (which is one reason why I think the whole country needs to be discussing the underlying problems to which you rightly refer), but it's the approach OFSTED are going to take under his leadership, so we'd all better get used to it - until the whole thing doubtless changes again at some point in the future.

Geostar says...
5:22pm Wed 14 Mar 12

I think we need to look at how bad the school was before Tudor took control. I have to say I heard some absolute horror stories coming out of that school. I have friends whose children had to go there and every day was a battle of some sort, from getting the children to want to go because of the bullying and disrupted classes to children simply scared to go to school beacuse the rule of the mob. I think a school that has a mixed catchment area is sometimes in a no win situation. It is a very difficult problem to solve as school should surely be there to teach and prepare the pupils for the 'real' world after education. I go back to my point about there being no consequences for actions, as that certainly isn't the case in the majority of workplaces. If you act like an animal, have no respect and physically assault people, you will be disciplined and most likely dismissed. I guess the arguement is how much do we expect schools to have to take. Reading the article what strikes me is the amount of physical assaults. That simply cannot be tolerated in a school. If you break the law you should get punished and I feel there has been too much of a softly softly approach to violence and the kids of today just laugh at the punishment metered out. The Chief Inspector, if that is correct, worries me greatly. It is the job of the Government and law makers of this land to ensure standards are in place, by ensuring there are consequences for actions. They have to deal with the source of the issues, which is the home. The school cannot educate the parents, and if the parents do not back the schools stance with their child, what hope does the school have? I feel extremely strongly about the few disruptive pupils dragging down the decent childs right to a good education and to feel safe at school. I don't sadly have the answer but I know the minority should not be allowed to disrupt the majority. Tudor Grange I suspect, do not take the decision to expel a pupil lightly, but I support their efforts to build a disciplined, respectful school enviroment for our children to flourish in. Society somehow has to work out how to deal with those who refuse to act in a decent way. The same is true on lots of other of todays issues!

Worcesterman says...
7:34am Thu 15 Mar 12

brooksider: do you need someone to write your letters for you?
instead of laughing do something more constructive.

Barney: you still did not answer my question, I asked is it not a better School, because of the removal of children that cause disruption.

If you are so concerned, why dont you have a go with their parents for bringing them up so distructive in the way they cause trouble at school.

When children go to school,they go to learn and not to be bullied and even get hit by them.

My concern is for them, not the ones who are quite rightly expelled. Tudor Grange are doing the right thing by getting rid of them.
So why dont you leave them alone, and let them do what they are supposed to do, TEACH.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree