- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Facebook
Worcester News
Like us on Facebook
Worcester News Sport
Like us on Facebook
Head defends school's record on exclusions (From Worcester News)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting WN NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
Head defends school's record on exclusions
9:10am Thursday 8th March 2012 in News
By Alicia Kelly, @aliciakellyWN #worcsnews
JUSTIFIED: Tudor Grange Academy headteacher Claire Maclean
A Worcester academy has defended its exclusion policy after figures showed it had expelled the second highest number of children from any academy in England.
Tudor Grange Academy permanently excluded 15 pupils (or 2.27 per cent of its pupils) in the academic year 2009/10 – the year the academy started.
It means the Bilford Road academy was responsible for removing a third of all the pupils expelled that year from Worcestershire’s secondary schools.
However, school principal Claire Maclean said it was a necessary move after the academy took over from the ailing Elgar Technology College in 2009.
She said: “We never take recourse to a permanent exclusion unless we have come to the end of the road or there has been a very serious incident from which there is no return.
“Unfortunately that was what we faced in the first two years.
“Mark one academies (sponsored) were schools in serious difficulties and that’s what we were dealing with.”
Mrs Maclean said the exclusions were often down to “extreme behaviour.” She also said the local authority had reintroduced 33 children to the school who had previously left Elgar, which was not helpful.
Department for Education figures show the total number of secondary school pupils permanently excluded in Worcestershire for the same academic year – the latest figures available – was 44 or 0.12 per cent of the school population.
Across the county, the majority of pupils were expelled for persistent disruptive behaviour.
There were 14 expelled for physical assaults on other pupils and five expelled for physical assaults on adults.
Unspecified numbers (but less than three) were recorded for verbal abuse or threatening behaviour towards other pupils, verbal abuse towards adults and for drugs or alcohol.
No pupils were excluded in the county for bullying, racist abuse, sexual misconduct, damage or theft.
Mrs Maclean refused to give excluded figures for 2010/11 but said they were also high although only two pupils had been expelled so far this academic year, since September.
However, she denied that the school had tried to improve its results by expelling difficult children.
She said: “The way in which we’ve transformed this school is by focusing on teaching and learning and improving what happens in the classroom.”
She also defended the school’s high level of fixed term exclusions saying the school had a zero tolerance approach to bad behaviour. She said: “We are looking to bringing it down and it is coming down but we won’t focus on just bringing the figures down by lowering our standards.”
The DfE does not publish school-by-school exclusion figures but numbers for Tudor Grange were obtained after a freedom of information request by the Anti Academies Alliance.
Other Worcestershire schools subsequently provided figures voluntarily to your Worcester News.
There were also seven permanent exclusions in the county’s primary schools. There were none in its special schools.
There were also 3,250 (or 4.26 per cent of the schools population) fixed period exclusions for primary, secondary and special schools of which 2,603 were at secondary schools.
Comments(26)
says...
says...
says...
says...
dulon
says...
10:17am Thu 8 Mar 12
Unfortunately that is not part of her remit but parental responsibility ought to be on the school curriculum.
ladyD123
says...
11:23am Thu 8 Mar 12
tinateabg
says...
11:56am Thu 8 Mar 12
Jannus
says...
2:00pm Thu 8 Mar 12
What will happen to excluded pupils when OFSTED fail the PRU's?
dulon
says...
3:20pm Thu 8 Mar 12
varien
says...
4:48pm Thu 8 Mar 12
john wilson
says...
5:30pm Thu 8 Mar 12
Look out for Tudor Grange's Ofsted report in the Worcester News on Saturday.
John Wilson (WN deputy editor)
RosieL
says...
8:27pm Thu 8 Mar 12
I am pleased that the pupils at this school have a better deal, its just a pity Elgar Technology College didnt enjoy the same support and vast sums of money and suffered these pupils being dumped on them from other schools.
lauraloo84
says...
2:45pm Fri 9 Mar 12
Barney the Parrot
says...
9:26pm Fri 9 Mar 12
gemma6
says...
7:30pm Sat 10 Mar 12
Barney the Parrot wrote:Well said Barney the Parrot
The chorus of support for the Headteacher above is all very well, but what then happens to the excluded kids? Until society faces up to its underlying problems which are causing the bad behaviour in the first place, every school has to accept its share of pupils with such behaviour, not just dump them outside the school gates for others to pick up, as Tudor Grange seems to be doing. One of the dangers with academies is precisely this kind of "I'm all right, Jack" attitude. This is no way to run a school system.
gemma6
says...
7:30pm Sat 10 Mar 12
Barney the Parrot wrote:Well said Barney the Parrot
The chorus of support for the Headteacher above is all very well, but what then happens to the excluded kids? Until society faces up to its underlying problems which are causing the bad behaviour in the first place, every school has to accept its share of pupils with such behaviour, not just dump them outside the school gates for others to pick up, as Tudor Grange seems to be doing. One of the dangers with academies is precisely this kind of "I'm all right, Jack" attitude. This is no way to run a school system.
laidback
says...
7:14am Tue 13 Mar 12
Barney the Parrot
says...
10:56am Tue 13 Mar 12
Worcesterman
says...
7:05am Wed 14 Mar 12
Go on and blame the Academy, for what they do.
Children go to School to learn, and they do not go to School to be bullied etc. And anyone not conforming to the rules, should learn to behave, or get thrown out.
Who do you think you are? Telling Tudor Grange that they should do their bit, like everyone else.
Perhaps you can tell me who everyone else is, are you one?
Do you go to Tudor Grange, and ask the Headteacher, if you can help these so called problem children.
And now you want a national debate about it, What another Quango?
As far as I can see she is doing a great job, its not the crap School
it used to be, and the children are doing better there.
Can you answer that? no I dont think so.
Barney the Parrot
says...
12:15pm Wed 14 Mar 12
brooksider
says...
1:00pm Wed 14 Mar 12
Barney the Parrot wrote:LOL! Worcesterman asked for that.
Cool your jets, "Worcesterman". Unlike you, I suspect, I've been involved in special educational needs provision in both a professional and a voluntary capacity for the best part of 30 years. The children who get thrown out of one school don't disapear into thin air. They still have to go somewhere, and that means they're added to the roll of other schools. When Tudor Grange or any school carries out a disproportionate number of exclusions, all they're doing is shuffling the problem on to other schools which already have their own to deal with. So forget your cheap kneejerking and start trying to give this very real problem some serious thought.
Geostar
says...
3:51pm Wed 14 Mar 12
Geostar
says...
4:08pm Wed 14 Mar 12
Barney the Parrot
says...
4:23pm Wed 14 Mar 12
Incidentally the new Chief Inspector, Sir Michael Wilshaw, would disagree with both of us about schools' duties - he has said straight out that it *is* the duty of schools to provide what they don't get at home. I think he's profoundly wrong about that (which is one reason why I think the whole country needs to be discussing the underlying problems to which you rightly refer), but it's the approach OFSTED are going to take under his leadership, so we'd all better get used to it - until the whole thing doubtless changes again at some point in the future.
Geostar
says...
5:22pm Wed 14 Mar 12
Worcesterman
says...
7:34am Thu 15 Mar 12
instead of laughing do something more constructive.
Barney: you still did not answer my question, I asked is it not a better School, because of the removal of children that cause disruption.
If you are so concerned, why dont you have a go with their parents for bringing them up so distructive in the way they cause trouble at school.
When children go to school,they go to learn and not to be bullied and even get hit by them.
My concern is for them, not the ones who are quite rightly expelled. Tudor Grange are doing the right thing by getting rid of them.
So why dont you leave them alone, and let them do what they are supposed to do, TEACH.
Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Log in with us
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Or
Log in with