We must not allow knee-jerk people to bully us (From Worcester News)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting WN NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
We must not allow knee-jerk people to bully us
8:20pm Saturday 14th July 2012 in News
By Richard Vernalls, @rvernallsWN #worcsnews
HEALTH chiefs embarking on the biggest shake-up of county healthcare in a generation must not be “bullied” by populist campaigns, a leading councillor has said.
The joint service review – which will be the subject of a full public consultation in the autumn – has already been floated by health bosses.
One of the most emotive options on the table for the future consultation is getting rid of one of the county’s two accident and emergency departments.
Individual locations are not yet being discussed.
However, of the three main hospitals at Worcester, Redditch and Kidderminster, Worcestershire Royal and the Alexandra Hospital have A&E services.
At Wychavon District Council, councillors debated the shake-up but agreed that wherever hospital services ended up, health chiefs must consider the needs of patients to physically get to these services, and that they are open all hours.
Councillor Judy Pearce said whatever happened, a 24/7 A&E service was “vitally important”.
She also delivered some hard words to what she described as “the knee-jerk people” raising petitions to prevent the loss of localised A&E services, including the Save The Alex campaign group, which opposes the loss of its A&E service.
“It is a huge problem, and they do need to get out to these knee-jerk people and explain to them the issues of the costs and efficiencies involved. Only clinical leaders [doctors, nurses, consultants] can do that explaining, and I think they do need to step forward.
“And it’s important we aren’t bullied into the wrong decisions by people who are not fully informed.
“It’s a hard decision but equally, it’s a decision that must be made.”
Coun Liz Tucker agreed, saying that people understandably had huge loyalties to their local hospitals, and it was difficult for clinicians to make them understand the difficult choices they were facing.
She added, however, that health leaders “cannot walk away” from the burden of costs its decisions may dump in the laps of other local authorities, for example transport costs.
Coun John Smith, who is also the county’s highways chief, said: “I had a recent conversation with the leader of the health trust, who told me, ‘John, we’re going to need a few more buses’.
“And I said, ‘No problem, we need some money off the health trust’ and he told me, ‘John, we haven’t got any money’.”
l The review can be viewed at worcestershirehealth.nhs. uk/joint-services-review.
Comments(7)
Andy_R
says...
10:32pm Sat 14 Jul 12
mayall8808
says...
10:22am Sun 15 Jul 12
WHOA who does she think she is??? If the people who pay the taxes and pay all the costs have a voice its through the ballot box, here again another Councilor who seems to show NO reguard for the taxpayer, Considering the total mess the management has got the NHS in and the stupidly high payouts they get, everyone has a view and when services that are vital to a community are at stake because of the dodgy management, what do you expect?
mayall8808
says...
10:25am Sun 15 Jul 12
Maggie Would
says...
11:03am Sun 15 Jul 12
Andy_R wrote:No change there then. The phrase 'leading councillor' in the first paragraph makes me feel quite angry. Oh yes.
Is it just me, or is Councillor Judy Pearce treating her constituents with quite sickening contempt?
daned
says...
11:22am Sun 15 Jul 12
If so it seems that Judy doesn't want to be held to account. Perhaps Punch would like to slap her down.
Jabbadad
says...
10:45pm Sun 15 Jul 12
Yes at this stage the Clinicians are deeply involved in putting this case forward, but I feel that when they face up to the fact that currently the NHS is deeply in debt, (despite Camerons empty words of almost unlimited funding at the dispatch box) I am aware that it is known that Worcestershire health services are in debt, they have secured a £20+ millions loan, and add to that they face a further £50 million in cuts / savings. Plus they cannot find the Doctors or Consultants to fill the existing vacancies, suggests to me that the proposals are about addressing the shortfalls and not bettering the services.
The problems of a lack of clinicians is the driving force to centralise the services so that the existing staff can possibly work more efficiently from reduced locations, which is common sense.
However where they move services from, those who live in that area will feel more exposed to longer travelling times. And we know that despite the promises that ambulance services will have more highly trained staffing, it is also accepted that in many emergency situations any delays to get to crucial services are a disadvantage to recoveries.
The reasons that there has to be changes are indeed clinical, since there is presently a shortage of specialist doctors and clinicians. And senior clinicians cannot see these vacancies being filled.
My fear is that the Doctors involved in these possible changes are being led up the garden path by Health Secretary Andrew Lansley, and based upon her comments of not listening to the people, support the party at any price politicians like coun Pearce.
howmanyusernames says...
10:10pm Sat 14 Jul 12