Zac Purchase under fire for defending Olympic badminton ‘tactics’

CONTROVERSY: Team GB Olympic rower Zac Purchase CONTROVERSY: Team GB Olympic rower Zac Purchase

WORCESTERSHIRE Olympic rower Zac Purchase has caused controversy on Twitter once again after seemingly defending the actions of eight badminton players disqualified from the Games.

The former King’s School Worcester pupil posted on his account yesterday that the athletes had been “playing tactically” and asked “what’s wrong with that?” prompting replies from disgruntled Olympic fans.

His comments come after a pair of players from China, two from South Korea and another from Indonesia were thrown out of the competition yesterday for “not using one’s best efforts to win a match”.

Just days before, Purchase – who once rowed with Upton and Evesham rowing clubs – had posted a picture of his security badge on the social networking site.

An hour after his original comment Purchase, who is one of Team GB’s strongest medal hopes and is set to compete in the semi-final of the men’s lightweight double sculls today, added that people should not blame the athletes as they were “playing the format to give them the best chance of winning long term”.

His comments were at odds with London 2012 chairman Lord Coe, who said the attempt to throw the matches to manipulate the draw was depressing and unacceptable.

While some users agreed with his tweets, many more argued the eight women’s doubles players’ actions were disgraceful.

Twitter user @WineBear said: “You are so wrong, you must play fair.”

And @HazzaJ_ wrote: “We paid £75 a ticket, turned up expecting world-class badminton, and got a match with the longest rally of 4 shots #GetItNow?”

Foul play was suspected during the badminton after Chinese top seeds Wang Xiaoli and Yu Yang started to show little interest in beating Koreans Jung Kyung-eun and Kim Ha-na to finish top of Group A.

Coming second would have meant avoiding compatriots and second seeds Tian Qing and Zhao Yunlei at least until the final.

Responding, the Koreans copied the Chinese and referee Thorsten Berg emerged to warn all the players.

The match restarted and the Koreans went on to win 21-14 21-11.

However, second Korean pair, the third seeds Ha Jung-eun and Kim Min-jung, also engineered defeat in their match against Indonesia's Meiliana Jauhari and Greysia Polii.

Their motive was apparent retaliation to avoid Wang and Yu in the quarter-finals, an outcome they failed to achieve as they eventually won 18-21 21-14 21-12.

The Indonesians responded to the Koreans by trying to lose themselves.

  • Visit our special Olympics page here .

Zac Purchase on Twitter

Worcester News has no responsibility or control over the content on external blogging sites, but you can contact us if you have a complaint.

Comments(3)

outside-edge says...
10:42am Thu 2 Aug 12

It's reprehensible that the Badminton descended into a farce, with neither side playing competitively.

However, what sorts of pressures were put on the Chinese Athletes by their superiors?

In a state where freedom of expression is not encouraged and doing what is best for the state rather than the individual, could there be another, hypocritical side to this story and the reason why one of the players has felt the need to retire from the sport?

Oh, and as for Zac Purchase, I and many others may not like or agree with what he said, but I defend him in being able to have his opinion and for not jumping on the populist bandwagon.

He's entitled to his opinion, as we live in a democracy where free speech is allowed.

Bravo, San Juan says...
10:53am Thu 2 Aug 12

How can you try your hardest in an event when you know that doing so is detrimental to your overall goal of winning a gold medal? These athletes train with complete dedication for years to win a medal and every factor counts, anyone gleefully saying they should have tried harder is in complete ignorance of sport at this level. I've rowed in events before where we needed third to qualify for a final soon after; we tried to come third as trying harder would have been detrimental and meant we couldn't have worked as hard as we'd need in the final. Therefore we paddled much lighter than race pace. It will be the same at this level. The difference is the ease with which you can 'throw' the event - like Grobbelaar was arousing suspicion in the nineties it stands out a mile in some sports. The fault lies with those organisers who made the loss the preferable option.

ushmush83 says...
11:06am Thu 2 Aug 12

This sort of thing happens all the time in all sports. I don't know why such a fuss was made this time!

Zac certainly said nothing wrong. This twitter thing is starting to get ridiculous now!

Congratulations for winning the semi-final Zac.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree