PM should not have to choose between causes

Funding: Cancer survivor Barbara Moss. Funding: Cancer survivor Barbara Moss.

A CANCER survivor from Worcester says Prime Minister David Cameron should never be asked to choose between foreign aid and cancer treatments at home after he came under fire by a radio caller.

Mr Cameron was criticised on the radio this week by a 68-year-old grandmother over the decision to send £12 billion abroad in foreign aid rather than spending it on helping people at home.

The woman, who suffers from non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, used the name Anne during the interview, refusing to give her real name because some of her family do not know she is ill.

She told Mr Cameron she needed a drug called ofatumumab but that the NHS refused to fund it. She said a two-year course of the drug would cost £250,000, which she could not afford. The mother-of-three, who was in tears, told Mr Cameron: “It’s not fair. I need some funding now.”

Mr Cameron said promises had been made on foreign aid and there was a moral obligation to help the world’s poorest people.

He also said NHS funding had been increased and was looking to extend the cancer drugs fund which gives people support to pay for treatments. Barbara Moss , aged 57, of Aconbury Close, Worcester, who survived bowel cancer, said: “I don’t think he should have been asked that.

“You can’t say take away from one good cause and give to another. We should not be taking away from aid or comparing it to funding cancer drugs. Each one has to be assessed in its own right.”

She said savings to help cancer patients could come from money wasted on administration and quangos and repeat prescriptions.

Mrs Moss and her family paid £21,000 for cancer drug Avastin which is not available on the NHS. She was diagnosed with bowel cancer and given months to live in 2006. She credits the drug with saving her life.

Comments(9)

mayall8808 says...
8:44am Sun 12 Aug 12

It just shows how callous this government is on supporting its own people, There is an underlying trend to see people who have worked hard all there life to do the right thing by saving and looking after themselves pay for everything being tarred with the same brush as the drunks,druggies and lazy good for nothings who get everything on the state, THEY are the ones who should be weeded out and we all no some??? It is NOT right that huge amounts of money being handed out to countries who even have a space programme,?, so why do they our money to look after there own people, Throwing money at them will not solve other countries problems we have been giving for years and years and all you can see is new Palaces and Big government buildings,apart from that if we gave nothing for 2-3 years our current deficit would be almost gone?
The lady in this article is quite right and i do hope she lives for many years to come as i have had family members in a similar position and its not a good time of life so we should all be hammering on our MPs door to get this sorted, rant over.

blueworcs says...
9:45am Sun 12 Aug 12

Quote"Mr Cameron said promises had been made on foreign aid and there was a moral obligation to help the world’s poorest people"Unquote.
WHY SHOULD WE!!!!!!
Surely there must be a moral obligation to our own people before handing over our taxes to countries that would happily watch us go under without lifting a finger to help.....Iran has recently been hit with an earthquake and who's first in with sending in rescue teams? Answer, The British. And what genuine thanks will we get? Answer, NON. Just another "moral obligation" to hand over more money to a foreign regime that doesn't give a **** for anyone but themselves.....

molecat says...
10:02am Sun 12 Aug 12

I have always been strongly in favour of helping those less fortunate than ourselves and lived under the misguided idea that if we helped lift the poor out of poverty then the world would be a more peaceful place and, in the long term, there would be huge economic benefits for all of us. I now realise that that money would be better spent on digging a very large hole, rounding up all of the bigoted, Daily Mail reading half wits in this country, throwing them down it then filling it in again.

Severnside says...
11:00am Sun 12 Aug 12

It's about time this Country's governments, past and present, ceased handing out aid to countries who either clearly don't need it, choose not to help themselves or where aid is not making any difference at all. By my reckoning, that is all the countries which tax payer's money goes to so if it means not helping any foreign country again, then so be it. People who have worked **** hard and paid their way in this country need to come first.

Maggie Would says...
11:38am Sun 12 Aug 12

Regrettably, that would need to be a very big hole indeed, molecat.

daned says...
12:12pm Sun 12 Aug 12

Cameron has been on an ego trip ever since he took office. The sooner he goes (preferably to Pakistan) the better.

skychip says...
12:24pm Sun 12 Aug 12

I find it quite frightening that if I should need treatment that there wouldn't be the money for it because of all we send abroad. Really needs addressing but people in authority don't seem to appreciate that fact.

molecat says...
12:46pm Sun 12 Aug 12

It's like Nick Griffin and his sister once came to Worcester, spawned some inbred children then left then here with just a computer for company.

pinkfluff says...
12:46pm Mon 13 Aug 12

pinkfluff likes ^ this

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree