Housing targets may see unpopular developments given approval

NOT AMUSED: Stuart Anderson, who was angry at the approval of more than 700 homes near his own house in Copcut Lane, Droitwich. NOT AMUSED: Stuart Anderson, who was angry at the approval of more than 700 homes near his own house in Copcut Lane, Droitwich.

HOUSEBUILDERS will keep trying to build large new housing estates against the wishes of elected councillors because of a government-imposed building target, a council report warns.

A vast swathe of Worcestershire is exposed to developers which want to build homes, because Wychavon District Council is still missing the five-year housing land supply target.

The target is set by government to boost the building of new homes, because of a national homes shortage.

At best, the council can show it has granted permission for enough homes to be built for the next four-and-a-half years.

The target is not arbitrary, taking account of population growth and other supporting evidence.

If councils cannot show they are granting enough planning applications permissions every year, they fall short of the target, like Wychavon.

If an unpopular planning application goes before Wychavon’s planning committee, and the councillors refuse to grant building permission, the application could instead be passed on appeal by a planning inspector because they could point to the fact the target is being missed.

A report by Wychavon’s own planning officers, published to planning committee members, states the council’s current target is for 455 a year. But last year Wychavon only had 313 new homes actually built.

Wychavon argues its target is based on outdated figures.

Earlier this year the committee’s decision to refuse 45 homes at Allesborough Farm, near Pershore, was overturned with the planning inspector in the appeal citing the “lack of a five-year land supply”.

Recently the Bovis Homes appeal against refusal to build 64 new homes on the old Army Medals office site in Worcester Road, Droitwich, was also successful, although it is not clear if land supply was a key issue in that case.

Also mentioned in the report is the 740-home development at Copcut Lane, Droitwich, which was passed by the councillors.

Although 740 homes have been allowed, only 350 count towards the target because big estates are built over a period of time.

Councillor Judy Pearce, elected planning chief, says the passage of the South Worcestershire Development Plan (SWDP) – a large-scale housing plan for the next 18 years growth – will help the council, as it provides hard evidence of where homes should be built.

“We’ve had to let a few [housing applications] through because we haven’t got a five-year housing land supply and we weren’t far enough along the way with the SWDP,” she said.

“But since the latest version was considered on July 3, we’re in a better position.”

Councils are voting on whether to adopt the next phase of the SWDP in November.

Comments(4)

skychip says...
5:17pm Sun 19 Aug 12

The Government need to look first at the infrastructure, schools and hospital facilities in the area where they plan for houses to be built before agreeing to planning applications being passed.

More Tea Vicar says...
8:42am Mon 20 Aug 12

There is so much wrong with the whole idea of mass house building in the area.

We have County Hall planning officers being paid a fortune to wreck the countryside and lives of the peope paying their parasitic salaries.

The local government mantra is always the pathetically weak 'we are only following orders' defence, saying they are just doing what elected officials, and thus ultimately the voters, want.

The reality is that the voting, tax paying public, gets no say in the matter.

Politicians and their friends in the construction industry will get their way. Local government officers will get their pay. And the environment and the public will be the ones who suffer.

Pity the Greens just don't seem to care about the environment enough to protest about this.

mayall8808 says...
12:04pm Mon 20 Aug 12

Wychavon and the County council have NO IDEA what they are doing to our local enviroment as they just seem to be passing almost any application despite legitimate objections, the Highways are absolutely blind to any sort of common sense about access to and from new developments in fact on one i know of they are just plain dangerous and show no knowledge of the area and its traffic yet its their job,
WHO says we need all these houses when there is no one to buy them and how about all the places empty? why are they not using brownfield sites? instead of the few green ones left.

neil53 says...
12:42pm Mon 20 Aug 12

Again, no attention being paid to the Localism Act where the views of the majority of residents by law have to be taken into account.
where is the "duty to cooperate" under the Localism Act?

WHAT is the supporting evidence for more and more houses and more and more land being "supplied" to developers?

Present this "evidence"!! Where is it? I bet local people never saw it!

And what about the " government forecasts" or whatever they are called that says we need more housing in this area. Did our elected councillors ever see this "evidence" because it was kept pretty secretive at the time?

Or do your Tory councillors take everything th government says on faith?

And where is the "supply" of houses for "affordable rent" ie social housing formally called council houses all sold off by previous Tory councillors?

It seems as if they are not there?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree