Pressure mounts on Allah Ditta over invoice mystery

PRESSURE: Allah Ditta (37089902) PRESSURE: Allah Ditta (37089902)

PRESSURE is mounting on Allah Ditta after a charity which runs Worcester’s Muslim cemetery admitted it had no idea why he was demanding cash from a family whose relative is buried there.

Yesterday we revealed how Mr Ditta had threatened to “dig up” the body of Monuhor Ali in a row with his family over a disputed £400 maintenance bill (listen to the recording below) .

The family deny owing any money to the Worcester Muslim Welfare Association, which leases the land from the city council, and say they have carried out any maintenance work themselves.

Now the family has produced an invoice handed to them by Mr Ditta – who is chairman of the association’s Worcester Muslim Cemetery Committee – a few days before the row.

The invoice is headed Worcester Muslim Funeral Services , which is neither a registered charity nor a company, and has no address or website.

Yesterday the chairman of the association Haris Saleem could not be contacted, but other members of the association, which was founded in 1978 and is a registered charity, distanced themselves from Mr Ditta’s demands for money.

All burials at the Muslim cemetery are carried out by the city council. Mr Ali’s family have paid a £625 burial fee to the council to cover this.

A spokesman for the association said it did not charge families anything, as it was up to families to maintain graves themselves. “We don’t issue invoices and never have done. We’ve got no idea where this has come from at all, it’s not from us.”

He said a team of volunteers regularly tends to the communal areas of the cemetery, but that work is done for free.

The invoice says the bill is for burial services, but Mr Ditta maintains the bill is genuine and is for maintenance services. He said: “Of course it was genuine work. We’ve had six people working on the grave. I am telling you, work has been done on it.

“Maybe I should not have said what I did in the heat of the moment though.”

The invoice carries a name – not Mr Ditta’s – and a telephone number and e-mail address at the bottom, but the number has not been answered since Tuesday and nobody has replied to a Worcester News e-mail.

The invoice does not give any details about the work being billed for, or give details about how the bill can be paid. It also suggests Mr Ali died on June 14, when it was actually the following day.

Mr Ali, a father-of-seven died in June, aged 74. His grave is tended by his son Ruhal Hussain and other family members.

Mr Hussain, aged 41, said: “No work has been done by anyone other than the council and my family. We are refusing to pay Mr Ditta, there’s no way we will.”

A spokesman for the city council said: “The management of the site is entirely the responsibility of the Muslim Welfare Association.

"When requested, the city council has carried out grave-digging and legal administration work on behalf of bereaved families.”

  • Listen to the controversial audio below. Warning: Bad language .

Comments(9)

MrSeeEss says...
9:45am Fri 31 Aug 12

Seeing all the comments from yesterday, looks like he is on his own, now.

MrSeeEss says...
9:49am Fri 31 Aug 12

... perhaps calls for him to resign and step down would be in the public interest, now?

ray1111 says...
10:00am Fri 31 Aug 12

the evening news really is having a witch hunt this week . Did the council provide and install the blocks on which the body is placed and covered or did mr ditta on behalf of the cemetary ? Worcester Council can dig a hole but do not provide for the particular rituals of a muslim burial , did the family organise this extra work or the council or mr ditta ?
I think i know the answer and the complainant certainly does. This is a [private matter that should have stayed private and of the 140 odd people buried here has any one else complained about paying for this facility ? which every one else does .

spider666 says...
10:25am Fri 31 Aug 12

ray1111 wrote:
the evening news really is having a witch hunt this week . Did the council provide and install the blocks on which the body is placed and covered or did mr ditta on behalf of the cemetary ? Worcester Council can dig a hole but do not provide for the particular rituals of a muslim burial , did the family organise this extra work or the council or mr ditta ?
I think i know the answer and the complainant certainly does. This is a
Fair comments and i'll be the first to put my hands up and say i don't know the in's and out's of this case but if i was just handed a bill for £400.00 with no detailed invoice coming with it then i would certainly question it.If Mr Allah Ditta has done no wrong then why does he not speak openly to the WN and set the record straight ( could anyone tell me where the £400.00 would have gone to if it had been paid) Whoever is right or wrong in this case the recorded conversation should never have happened,threatening to exhume the body is nothing short of disgusting,if all was legal and above board then maybe Mr Ditta should take the legal route and taken it to court.

MrSeeEss says...
10:32am Fri 31 Aug 12

In any circumstances, who in their right mind would pay an invoice for services not disclosed to a company or organisation which does not exist?

The contact on the invoice is to an anonymous 3rd party, who refuses to answer questions delivered by the press, to present their case.

The Worcester Muslim Welfare Association strictly denies any involvement with the invoice.

All services which can be invoiced should have a contract or agreement for work carried out.

If there is a contract or agreement for this work to be carried out, why not present this?

Because no such agreement was ever in place, perhaps?

Allhajj xxxx says...
10:43am Fri 31 Aug 12

The certain complaint made by the family is not all true.
Listned to the conversation can't make head or tails out of it.I think what Mr Ditta said was if you want me to justify the bill Do you want me to dig the grave to show it to you.

The complaintant has paid the council fees but everything else is payable.i.e
use of mosque mortuary and out of hours service,materials used in the grave preperation,Yearly cemetry maintenance (grass cutting).

Mr Ali and a considerable number of the community are not aware of the maintenance of the cemetry the materials used etc The time given by Mr Ditta and other individual on this is Totally Free and have been for the past 10years. I know this as I am part of it.( as we dont want recognition for this)

" But I must speak now as comments being made without full knowledge of the whole picture"
And those who are not making the comments are keeping neutral for there personal gains.

The cemetry organisation exsists and has been for the past 10 years.

May be we should ask Mr Ali and family before there fathers burial what input have they done towards the CEMETRY (Voluntarily).

Or are they just after a witch hunt since Mr Nazural is an ousted Ex Labour councillor.?????

I let the comment makers decide with this extra info.

Hwicce says...
10:49am Fri 31 Aug 12

"Curiouser and curiouser!" said Alice.

If we have an invoice for unknown services from an unknown company, then one has to wonder if all the tax is being paid on this work by those running the business.

Maybe there should be an investigation by more than just the Council into the ethics and legality of all this.

Anyone from HMRC reading this?

spider666 says...
11:05am Fri 31 Aug 12

Allhajj **** wrote:
The certain complaint made by the family is not all true.
Listned to the conversation can't make head or tails out of it.I think what Mr Ditta said was if you want me to justify the bill Do you want me to dig the grave to show it to you.

The complaintant has paid the council fees but everything else is payable.i.e
use of mosque mortuary and out of hours service,materials used in the grave preperation,Yearly cemetry maintenance (grass cutting).

Mr Ali and a considerable number of the community are not aware of the maintenance of the cemetry the materials used etc The time given by Mr Ditta and other individual on this is Totally Free and have been for the past 10years. I know this as I am part of it.( as we dont want recognition for this)

" But I must speak now as comments being made without full knowledge of the whole picture"
And those who are not making the comments are keeping neutral for there personal gains.

The cemetry organisation exsists and has been for the past 10 years.

May be we should ask Mr Ali and family before there fathers burial what input have they done towards the CEMETRY (Voluntarily).

Or are they just after a witch hunt since Mr Nazural is an ousted Ex Labour councillor.?????

I let the comment makers decide with this extra info.
Allhajjxxxx ---you have just stated in your comment that quote "The time given by Mr Ditta and other individual on this is Totally Free and have been for the past 10years. I know this as I am part of it."unquote ---so bearing this in mind,why has Mr Ditta given him an unitemised bill for £400.00

murray kelso says...
11:08am Fri 31 Aug 12

Comments are now closed on this article. Please read the final comment here for an explanation http://www.worcester

news.co.uk/news/9899

520.Allah_Ditta_in_b

urial_ground_row___a

udio

MK - Digital Editor

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree