Labour county group adds voice to Ditta row

FRESH calls have been made for an investigation into Allah Ditta – this time by leading figures at Worcestershire County Council .

County Hall’s Labour group has urged the controlling Conservatives to suspend the politician and carry out a full inquiry into the infamous graveyard row.

As your Worcester News reported last week, Mr Ditta threatened to “dig up” a dead man’s body during a dispute with a grieving family at the city’s private Muslim cemetery.

The tirade, which was secretly recorded, started because he wants £400 from them for work he claims was done on preparing the grave. Mr Ditta, who was acting as a volunteer at the cemetery, is both a city and county councillor.

Councillor Richard Udall , deputy leader of the county’s Labour group, said: “We all make mistakes and say things we later regret, but the allegations against him are much more serious. We believe his conduct at the very least needs a full investigation.

“We need to send a clear message to the public that as political leaders we will not tolerate activity that could harm the reputation of all councillors.”

He has sent a letter to Coun Adrian Hardman, leader of the authority, urging him to “suspend Mr Ditta” and investigate the dispute, urging him to act “quickly and decisively”.

Mr Ditta’s bill was over the grave of Monuhor Ali, who died in June, aged 74.

The family say they are refusing to pay the bill because no work was done on the grave, which Mr Ditta denies.

The calls for an investigation comes only days after the city’s council’s Labour group said they had “no confidence” in him and attempted to have him removed as chairman of the Guildhall ’s Hopmarket sub-committee. Yesterday, Mr Ditta said: “I won’t be quitting anything, this is pie-in-the sky stuff.”

Coun Hardman has refused to investigate the incident, and said he believed it was “a city council issue”. “If the family complain to us, it will be investigated, but I think it’s a personal dispute,” he said.

Mr Ali’s family are copying Mr Ditta’s rant on to a CD and sending it to the city council and Worcester Conservative Association, along with formal letters of complaint.

Comments(7)

playstation3 says...
5:51pm Thu 6 Sep 12

what the council wants to do now is check just how many invoices have been given out to store owners in dittas name instead of the council...especialy as he is chairman of the hopmarket sub-commitee...i reckon powers that be are afraid to take action , as if they do out will come the usual racist brush..

Graham Price says...
6:46pm Thu 6 Sep 12

How very uncharitable of Mr Ditta.

Someone should point out to Mr D. that Home Office approval is needed to exhume a body.

Has Inspector Knacker of the Yard been brought in to investigate the wicked threat made by Mr D.?

Or is this a new Tory policy to harrass and threaten the dead?

I think we should be told.

Truepear says...
7:21pm Thu 6 Sep 12

I dont understand why the CONDEM council cannot condemn Mr Ditta. Well, i thought it was good anyway!

Hwicce says...
8:04pm Thu 6 Sep 12

Ah, I do love to watch the game of politics in the summer. The sound of a buck being passed between the politcal teams each waiting for the other team to make a mistake and actuallly do something.

Oh to be in England.....

keeneye says...
7:39am Fri 7 Sep 12

This issue has really put the cart in the ditch - its upset the cosy arrangement lab and con councillors have - the oppositions should have come out all guns blazing on this one - wheres the cut and thrust of politics in this town, thats why Ditta knows he can get away with it - weak opposition - apathy - or is it the others dont want the beans spilt on there little arrangements ...no doubt at the death the "R" card will be played that will set the rabbits running for cover.

mayall8808 says...
8:24am Fri 7 Sep 12

Sack him, he has brought the council into disrepute, you have the evidence what more do you want? a lengthy inquiry at tax payers expense again?

EconoXL says...
11:28am Fri 7 Sep 12

I think at the very least there should be an investigation into the financial aspects of this matter. So far no-one seems to be owning up to issuing the invoice, what it is actually for and who is being paid. I strongly suspect that someone is making a few pounds out of this and isn't declaring the income.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree