Review says baby’s death could have been avoided

Theo's father Jonathan James was jailed for five years for manslaughter. Theo's father Jonathan James was jailed for five years for manslaughter.

THE death of a baby who was shaken violently by his father could potentially have been avoided, a review has found.

Six-month-old Theo Davies died at his home in Old Ford Walk, on the Walshes estate in Stourport, in 2009.

His father, paratrooper Jonathan James, was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to five years in prison in December 2011.

Worcestershire Safeguarding Children Board (WSCB) has been conducting a serious case review into Theo’s death and yesterday published its executive summary report.

It says that although agencies were aware of James’ “violent and criminal history”, and that domestic abuse was a feature of his relationship with Theo’s mother Leanne Davies, they had no idea the two parents were living together again prior to the tragedy occuring.

Diana Fulbrook, independent chairman of the WSCB, said: “Agencies believed that the parents' relationship had ended permanently and support was provided to the mother to enable her to care for her son as a single parent.

“At first, the mother indicated that she did not want the father to have any involvement with the child. The situation changed when she agreed to supervised contact.”

The parents became reconciled after James started having contact with Theo. However, the review found this happened without the knowledge of any agencies involved – including the police, armed forces, primary health trust and children’s services. James was staying with Ms Davies and Theo at the time of his death.

Mrs Fulbrook said: “The serious case review considered that the death was potentially preventable. “If the agencies had known that the child was living with both parents, there would have been an assessment of risk to the child and a multi-agency plan put in place to manage this risk.

“The review concluded that there were lessons to be learned in relation to inter-agency working.”

As a result of the review, an action plan has been in place since January 2010 to improve working between different agencies.

Multi-agency risk assessment conferences, introduced in November 2008 before the incident involving Theo, have been strengthened.

Mrs Fulbrook said implementation of the action plan had been closely monitored and “there is evidence that the recommendations have been acted upon”.

She said that the WSCB’s thoughts were with Theo’s family.

Comments(9)

Jackie Barry says...
3:29pm Tue 11 Sep 12

So very sad. Once again Social Services fail in thier duty to a child. I am sure the family take comfort in the line
"She said that the WSCB’s thoughts were with Theo’s family"

cargiftworld says...
7:29pm Tue 11 Sep 12

Absolutely, nothing to do with the father at all.

lizzyloolah says...
8:29pm Tue 11 Sep 12

Or the mother?

Doesitmakesense?? says...
8:34pm Tue 11 Sep 12

It is so sad when a precious child's life is taken away so tragically. However we shouldn't blame the Social Services so quickly - they have a tremendously difficult job to do - often with limited resources and the only feedback they get from the public is when it goes wrong. We don't hear about the successes. The agencies didn't know he was living there again so unless they spy on people - something they aren't allowed to do - it's hard to keep track of violent men. Having said that action must be taken to prevent this from happening again. Also it's important to remember that we all have a responsibility to safeguard children therefore if we have concerns about violence in families we should report it rather than feel we are 'dobbing people in'. RIP little Theo.

katiekins says...
9:26pm Tue 11 Sep 12

SOCIAL SERVICES FAIL TO DO THEIR JOB YET AGAIN.RIP LITTLE THEO

cargiftworld says...
10:12pm Tue 11 Sep 12

The "mother" and "father" failed to do their job. How can anyone other than them be to blame? They aren't.

More Tea Vicar says...
8:27am Wed 12 Sep 12

This is a terrible tragedy, but the people responsible were the parents.

It is right and proper to blame organisations like councils, social services, hospitals, police etc when they get things seriously wrong, which they could have been expected to get right.

But this isn't like a wrongly-designed road or junction, or failure to deal with litter, or keep a hospital clean, or overrpay senior managers, or build a white elephant industrial estate etc.

This is a situation in which parents took decisions and actions, which social services couldn't be expected to know about or deal with properly, unless they'd had them under constant surveillance and maybe even custody.

Blame where blame is due, sure. But there have to be limits on the blame culture.

Fog Based Japery says...
9:44am Wed 12 Sep 12

I fail to see how this is anyone's fault other than the violent fathers.

Jackie Barry says...
12:49pm Wed 12 Sep 12

cargiftworld wrote:
The "mother" and "father" failed to do their job. How can anyone other than them be to blame? They aren't.
Of course it's the parents fault but, once again, Social Services were involved and failled to do thier job properly. So many times we hear" Social workers were aware" or "Family had warned the services" Yes it's a difficult job but please... How many more little lives are going to be lost because they fail to carry out the job properly?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree