Village ‘better than an estate’

THERE are calls to build a village-sized development rather than a 250-home housing estate on the outskirts of Worcester.

The Bevere Development Opposition Group (BDOG) is opposed to plans on adjoining land which could see the homes built off Ombersley Road and Green Lane.

Applications were submitted to build on the land but later pulled by developers, while a consultation over the much larger-scale South Worcestershire development plan is consulted on.

In its latest revision however, penned in the summer, the SWDP makes it clear that there is room for about 250 homes there – a number the Bevere activists oppose.

They have now published an “alternative” for 70 homes, which they say takes account of the area with its views to the Malvern hills, and its neighbouring Bevere Conservation Area.

And they want to discuss their option with the SWDP planning officers, drawn from the three district councils in south Worcestershire.

Craig Routledge, BDOG chairman, said following careful study of planning policies in the SWDP preferred options document, the group felt its proposal balanced the interests of all parties.

“Overall, about 70 houses could be built, which would give rise to the kind of nucleated village already advocated for other rural areas of south Worcestershire and where the houses and layout matched the style of the area. “We invite the SWDP team leaders to meet us and see more of what we propose.

“It has been hard all round to find a way of balancing the need for new houses with the need to conserve the historic landscape but we believe our plans do just this.”

A spokesman for the SWDP said: “Any consultation feedback will be considered by members in November.”

Comments(4)

More Tea Vicar says...
7:45pm Wed 19 Sep 12

What is really needed is a referendum, not this stupid 'consultation'.

Let's see if the people, as opposed to local government planning officers and their cronies in the building industry actually want this plan at all.

The consulation is a complete sham, designed to give these parasites cover for their environment wrecking plans.

skychip says...
7:53pm Wed 19 Sep 12

Wish someone could step in and we could have a proper discussion about this Development Plan. It's not a case of nimbyism - I don't think the City can cope with any more houses - where will the children go to school and where is the infrastructure to cope with all the extra vehicles etc.

mayall8808 says...
8:51am Thu 20 Sep 12

skychip;;i totally agree and i have been saying the same for years, i bought my house on the outskirts of the city 34 years ago because i liked the views, the location and i have seen it gradually encroached on over the years, i accept we are getting over populated and we need some more housing but we do need to keep the enviroment we bought into as much as possible or these money grabbing developers will be building on your drive.

one94 says...
9:12am Thu 20 Sep 12

For once it would be nice for the planners to represent the wishes of local people and put their weight behind the new proposal which seems a fair balance between over development and none at all.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree