- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Facebook
Worcester News
Like us on Facebook
Worcester News Sport
Like us on Facebook
Details of plan to transform town revealed (From Worcester News)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting WN NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
Details of plan to transform town revealed
4:10pm Monday 1st October 2012 in News By Tarik Al Rasheed
BIG IDEAS: An artist’s impression of how the centre of the development proposed for Malvern could look
MORE detailed plans for the 700-home development that could change the face of Malvern have been revealed for the first time.
The Worcester News's sister paper the Malvern Gazette has obtained a report by developer Gleeson Strategic Land outlining its plans for a massive development of housing and employment land at Newland on the north-east edge of Malvern.
The site, a major belt of farmland between Lower Howsell Road and the A449 Worcester Road, is earmarked for 700 homes in the South Worcestershire Devel-opment Plan (SWDP).
Gleeson was first linked with the area in 2008, when it submitted a report recommending the same site for inclusion in the South Worcestershire Joint Core Strategy – the aborted predecessor of the SWDP.
However, the latest document, received by stakeholders including parish councils and Malvern Civic Society this week, reveals exactly what Gleeson has in mind.
As well as 700 homes, including affordable housing and accommodation for the elderly, it refers to 25 acres of employment land, a primary school, community hall, cemetery, police post and neighbourhood shops.
Almost half of the site would be green space, including sports pitches, play areas and a community orchard.
The SWDP – a planning blueprint mapping out where development should take place until 2030 – is still a work in progress and must win the backing of Malvern Hills district councillors before going forward to an examination in public and potential adoption in 2013.
Gleeson spokesman Scott Chamberlain said: “The site is within walking distance of Malvern and, due to the scale proposed, it can deliver multi-million pound improvements to local roads, the Townsend Way roundabout, affordable housing, on-site employment and new facilities.
Roger Sutton, chairman of Malvern Civic Society, said: “I think it is extremely presumptuous when it has not even been agreed to build any houses at Newland.”
Comments(9)
Samboy
says...
11:49pm Mon 1 Oct 12
denon
says...
7:06am Tue 2 Oct 12
Andy-Apache
says...
7:54am Tue 2 Oct 12
1) It's not necessary
2) It will be built on greenbelt
3) It won't be like the artists impression (compare and contrast same for north site)
4) There will be no increase in employment in line with the increased headcount (as per north site)
5) See 4 - people who move in, who actually work, will be commuting, putting further strain on an already busy road network, and already insufficient motorway link.
6) See 3 & 4 - the developer will not improve the road network, or build the business units 'promised' (as per north site)
I'm sure there's plenty more, but maybe you just prefer the view of endless sprawling housing estates rather than fields and trees?
FarmerT
says...
1:51pm Tue 2 Oct 12
In any development of this scale, I feel sorry for the people's whos houses back onto the site. They pay a premium for a rural setting within urban convenience and suddenly their nice view is ruined by lego brick houses. I think all developers should compensate those who border the development, by getting 3 estate agents to quote the loss in value. Or make the developer give those people an option to sell at market rate.
Hwicce
says...
2:14pm Tue 2 Oct 12
If they don't/won't/can't do this then they are just fools if they think they own the view.
I'm sure someone has complained about their view since the first caveman left the cave and built the first house. It won't change so you may as well get over it and stop whinging about it all the time. It just gets very boring for the rest of us having to hear you drone on all the time.
sugarlump
says...
3:11pm Tue 2 Oct 12
Andy-Apache
says...
3:16pm Tue 2 Oct 12
As farmer T says, year on year, the green space around villages is eroded by ugly developments, leading to villages merging into one large housing estate.
You only need to look back less than a century to see Barnards Green, Malvern Link and Great Malvern being totally separate entities. Now, it is one large populated built up area.
Are you sure you are happy for there to be no green space at all in another 100 years?
Oh, and please feel free not to read or respond if you don't want to 'hear us drone'.
FarmerT
says...
1:42pm Wed 3 Oct 12
You sould like a developer!!!
I agree, if you buy on the edge of a town then you risk drowning in concrete. However it doesn't stop me feeling sorry for those that are surrounded.
There is plenty of non green belt land to regenerate and redevelop. The problem is that it is more costly than tearing up hedgerows and felling trees and everything is done for the cheapest option these days...
More Tea Vicar says...
8:06pm Mon 1 Oct 12
If the Tories are looking to increase their electoral chances, and make useful spending cuts, the SWDP is the place to start.
Usual generic, meaningless chocolate box picture, trying to hide the fact that the SWDP is a complete disaster.
As for the Greens - are they actually interested in the environment?