Why have we been left without a police officer?

FEARS: Councillor Richard Boorn FEARS: Councillor Richard Boorn

A POLICEMAN has been allocated to cover a high-priority area of Worcester, but his relocation has left other parts of the city without a dedicated officer.

PC Tim Woods was previously the local policing officer for the Nunnery (which includes Shrub Hill, Ronkswood, Spetchley Road and parts of Red Hill), Warndon and Warndon Villages policing areas.

Although he is still based at Warndon police post, he will now concentrate on the Gorse Hill policing area (Tolladine and parts of Warndon).

The move leaves Nunnery and Warndon Villages without a dedicated officer and comes amid growing concern about a decline in the number of local policing officers in south Worcestershire.

Councillor Richard Boorn, who represents Nunnery, said the move was “bad news” for residents. He said: “We have police community support officers here and I genuinely believe they do a really good job.

“But they can’t do it all and they haven’t got the powers police officers have got. It’s not a good situation to be in at all.

“Every area needs a police officer, and it’s not like there isn’t a real need here. We’ve had break-ins down Spetchley Road and a drugs raid in Ronkswood.

“Nobody can say we don’t need a police officer. It’s a prime example of frontline cuts.”

Last month, we revealed that a review by West Mercia Police had led to concerns that neighbourhood police stations could close and the number of ‘beat bobbies’ be drastically reduced.

West Mercia say local policing teams will remain although no decision has been taken about the number of officers or where they will be based.

The review has been ordered following the force’s alliance with Warwickshire Police – to save about £30 million.

A spokesman said the proposed restructure of neighbourhood teams had been put on hold until the election and appointment of a police and crime commissioner next month.

“Although this means in the short term, Nunnery is without a dedicated local policing officer, we would like to reassure local people that the area is being covered by officers from other neighbourhood teams,” he said.

“PC Tim Wood remains based at Warndon, with a primary focus on Gorse Hill.”

He said the police officer who covers Battenhall and St Peter’s will eventually have responsibility for Nunnery.

SHOCK DECISION

MEMBERS of Warndon Parish Council have expressed their disappointment that they were not consulted on the decision to move PC Tim Wood, with one councillor calling the lack of a local policing officer in the area “disturbing”.
At a meeting of the parish council on Monday night, community support officer (CSO) Jenny Humphries said PC Wood had been moved to Gorse Hill because there was not a police officer there.
But Councillor Ray Morris said: “Only a matter of months ago we made peace with the police about co-ordinating with us, then we get this shock announcement.
“I don’t know who’s making the decisions, but no one is talking to us about it.
“It’s really, really disturbing that we don’t have a local police officer present.”
CSO Humphries said: “The reason why Tim has moved to Gorse Hill is because it’s a red area and Warndon Villages is a green area. The priority lies with Gorse Hill.”
But Coun Steve Mackay said: “We wouldn’t want to become a red area.”
Chairman Nick Fielden said the fact the parish council had not been informed of the decision to move PC Wood was disappointing. The parish council voted to write a letter to Inspector Janet Heritage, who is in charge of geographical policing for Worcester.

Comments(5)

skychip says...
1:20pm Wed 3 Oct 12

Have written to Robin Walker regarding the issue - but not a very convincing reply. He said he would take the matter up with the prospective Conservative Police Commissioner, who apparently is interested in local policing!

More Tea Vicar says...
1:44pm Wed 3 Oct 12

Interesting that the Tories can't afford police officers, but are prepared to waste money on Police Commissioners.

Then again, I find it odd that we can apparently afford, and need, elections for the new job, but not on the South Worcestershire Development Plan.

I sometimes think the Tories are just gagging to lose the next election.

Landy44 says...
5:24pm Wed 3 Oct 12

It's definitely an impossible decision on who to vote for next time round isn't it?

Do you vote for the numpties in office who don't seem to be able to cut costs sufficiently quickly in the right places, while leaving essential services like this in place....OR....do you vote for the previous lot of numpties who are a big part of why we're in such financial dire straights in this country.

None of the political parties seem to be able to get it right, so either they're all inept or corrupt, or it's the system that's wrong.

But then again - who actually made the decision about the reallocation of this police officer? I'd say the police service may be making the wrong decisions on their own cuts!

Either way, there are hundreds more areas to cut than a policeman on the street.

Just what are our taxes paying for?

jb says...
6:00pm Wed 3 Oct 12

A few years ago all the local areas had Beat Officers or Beat Managers and a team of Special Constables who worked with them. This system worked well but it appears to have disintegrated into a right shambles now. CSO's have no police powers so all they are able to do is patrol or follow up on enquiries, Specials do have police powers and are able to perform the same duties as regular officers but I haven't seen one mention of them in the report.
It's more than obvious that the thin blue line is getting thinner every year.

reflector says...
7:37pm Wed 3 Oct 12

This should be no surprise. Do people really think that the lunatic policy of a 20% cut in police budgets would have no effect on the numbers of available police officers? This was always bound to happen and will only get worse as long as those in power keep on talking the tripe that it will only effect 'the back office' staff, as if they weren't doing anything anyway!

Police Commissioners are a total irrelevance to the funding situation but putting all the responsibilities of the existing Police Authorities in the hands of one individual is a highly dangerous political gimmick. Just one of the 'back of a fag packet' Tory policies which won't work and which no-one wanted.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree