Pervert lured young girls on Facebook

FACEBOOK PERVERT: Jeremy Pond FACEBOOK PERVERT: Jeremy Pond

A WORCESTER man was today starting a five-year jail sentence for sexually assaulting young girls he met on Facebook.

Jeremy Pond pleaded guilty at Worcester Crown Court to 14 charges of sex offences against seven girls.

The 24-year-old was sent to immediate custody for five years, less 146 days already spent on remand, but was told that he will be subject to another four years supervision on licence once he is released.

Judge Patrick Thomas QC also ordered his computers to be destroyed and banned him from contact with children through the internet.

Police would be able to monitor any use of the internet and he was ordered to register as a sex offender for life.

Officers began an investigation in September last year when they were alerted by another Facebook user about chat on Pond’s site, said Alex Warren, prosecuting.

Pond, of Winchcombe Drive, Blackpole, was arrested in October on suspicion of inciting a child to engage in sexual activity. His first victim was a girl who had just turned 16 but it was discovered they had engaged in sexual chat leading to intercourse when she was only 15.

Pond had also groomed another 15-year-old through sexual messages and sexual activity took place in her home when her parents were in another room.

Another contact made through Facebook was a 14-year-old girl he took to his home and admitted assaulting when she refused other advances.

Pond incited another 14-year-old to get involved in pornography by sending naked pictures of herself.

When he went to the home of another 14-year-old, he admitted inciting her to engage in sexual activity with another girl. He also sent sexual messages to another 14-year-old on Facebook.

Mr Warren said Pond told a 12-year-old he was “sex mad” before asking her to engage in sexual activity by sending him “dirty pictures” of herself.

He also admitted making indecent images of children and 28 found on his computer.

Barry Newton, defending, said Pond was of previous good character. He was sexually active and had fathered two children at a very young age. He had no hobbies and had an adolescent approach to sex.

Judge Thomas accepted that Pond had real difficulties in life but he had been attracted to under-aged girls partly because he himself was not mature.

The concern was not punishment but controlling his behaviour in future. He would need constant supervision by the probation service on his release.

Detective Constable Zoey Carter, who led the police investigation, said she was satisfied with Pond’s sentence including the nine years he must spend on licence, once released, and provision to sign the sex offenders register indefinitely.

She commended “the bravery and strength of the young victims” throughout, adding that police would pursue allegations of sex crimes “no matter how long ago they happened”.

Comments(6)

mr.meldrew says...
10:10am Thu 4 Oct 12

should have been 25 years......

More Tea Vicar says...
11:33am Thu 4 Oct 12

Sounds like a good result.

The article says he fathered two children. Was he supporting them, or is that down to the state, i.e. the taxpayer, via benefits? If so, it's a sad indictment of the welfare dependency that seems to be prevalent in some sectors of our society.

And I really wish the Worcester News would stop calling these people 'perverts'. Not that I can imagine any decent person would think anything different. It's just that readers are mature enough to decide for themselves, they don't need to have value judgements made for them.

More to the point, I can't help worrying that it's the kind of inflammatory language that helps lead to violence, even the murder that the Worcester News is leading with today.

katiekins says...
4:22pm Thu 4 Oct 12

Hope he rotts in hell pervert........

More Tea Vicar says...
5:00pm Thu 4 Oct 12

TheIndependentPoliti
cian
wrote:
More Tea Vicar - you sound like an armchair Liberal!!! This child devouring monster needs locking up for longer, but if we were living in Saudi Arabia they'd chop is Googles off with any luck. The sentence is ok from a Brit perspective but a typical Liberal, weak Mamsy Pamsy outcome. Elect me and we'll go back to flogging this people in public once a month as a deterrent to others.
No, I can be accused of many things, but absolutely not that. Did you notice my concern over benefits?

I am glad he's been sent down, and hope he won't be out for a long time, but that when he does come out, he doesn't do it all again.

But though I think the Worcester News is a great newspaper in many ways, I do wish they'd stop some of their verbal ticks. Referring to themselves as YOUR Worcester News is one of them.

Referring to sex offenders as 'perverts' is another. They're
a/stating the obvious, which is condescending
b/presuming to tell us what to think and
c/potentially fuelling the climate that sees ex-offenders getting hounded, perhaps even attacked.

The headline story is about someone the Worcester News would refer to as a 'pervert', for example. Not saying there is a causal link in that case, but still...

Newsreader81 says...
8:27pm Thu 4 Oct 12

More tea vicar can I make point of your point b, they aren't telling us what to think they are stating a fact! He's been convicted as a sex offender making him a pervert. And on his release no doubt he will be rehoused within yards of a school as we see so often. I will keep my opinion to myself regarding what I think should happen to perverts as I don't want to fill the page with bad language but I can tell you it's not a 5yr sentence where he will serve half!

9001 says...
8:56pm Thu 4 Oct 12

Rule 42. Things have changed. It used to be rule 45 when I was a jailer. Rule 42 in google. Something to do with sailing.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree