Benefits cheat claimed more than £30k

Benefits cheat claimed more than £30k Benefits cheat claimed more than £30k

A Worcester woman claimed nearly £31,000 in state benefits after failing to declare that she and her estranged husband had got back together.

At first, Carole Howard made a legitimate claim for income support and housing and council tax benefits as a lone parent when the couple split up in 2005.

But two years later Howard’s husband John began living with her again at her home in Martindale Close, Warndon, and he had a full-time job, said Adam Western, prosecuting at Worcester Crown Court.

Over a two-year period Howard fraudulently clai-med benefits totalling £30,981 after failing to notify Worcester City Council and the Department of Work and Pensions about a change of circumstances.

The 56-year-old pleaded guilty to two counts of benefit fraud and was sentenced to 16 weeks’ jail, suspended for two years.

She must also keep to an electronically monitored overnight curfew for three months and be supervised by the probation service for two years.

Judge John Cavell said Howard had buried her head in the sand instead of revealing the co-habitation. But he said it was plain from letters written to the court that otherwise she was an honest and caring woman whom others looked up to.

Howard, who had paid back £559 through deductions to her disabled living allowance, had racked up debts through a 20-year addiction to slot machines, said Michael Aspinall, defending.

Her finances were in a chaotic state and she foolishly thought that by declaring her change of circumstances she would lose all her entitlements.

She suffered from osteoarthritis, walked with two sticks and relied on her husband – who was stricken with pulmonary disease – to do the housework.

Mr Aspinall said she had brought up her grand-daughter since the age of two and she was planning to go to university.

She also provided support for her 81-year-old mother whom she saw every day.

“There was no high living and she has shown genuine remorse,” said Mr Aspinall.

“She is in considerable pain and is too young to have a knee replacement. Custody would have had a catastrophic effect on her and on others.”

Comments(8)

Hack says...
12:49pm Thu 11 Oct 12

Man ignores warnings his house is a building site and is fined £3,100. The person here defrauds the City et al of £30K+. No fine, though suspended prison sentence. Worth discussion?

Vox populi says...
1:24pm Thu 11 Oct 12

Probably Hack however somebody will be along to tell you she is a nice lady, stricken with things beyond her control with a crippling addiction and slot machine dependency. She can only afford 50p a week to pay back and will continue getting benefits anyway to a much greater value than she can pay back.
The person who was fined for his house has probably worked all their life, paid tax and contributed towards the benefit system and the NHS. Due to this they have more than 10 pence to their name they are a much easier target to remove yet more cash to prop up a failing state benefit system.
Anybody who believes we have a justice system based on the gravity of a crime only needs to compare sentences for Fraud against those for murder.
Still naughty naughty - don't break the law!!

moatler says...
1:29pm Thu 11 Oct 12

What's more interesting is that this level of benefits, even if legitimate, for one person uses up two or three average persons total tax contribution - it's no wonder the country's struggling.

TDH123 says...
1:47pm Thu 11 Oct 12

Shocking! People like her need to be locked up immediately for a long period of time to deter other such parasites. It is people like this who are bringing this once great country to its knees.

keeneye says...
1:58pm Thu 11 Oct 12

My wife worked in a shop - sometimes on the check out. She could never get her head round the "Benifitters" who came in and put 1/2 bottle of Vodca, a pack of ciggy's and carton of milk on the check out and paid for the first two items with cash and the milk with milk tokens ??

jb says...
7:16pm Thu 11 Oct 12

Judge John Cavell said Howard had buried her head in the sand instead of revealing the co-habitation. But he said it was plain from letters written to the court that otherwise she was an honest and caring woman whom others looked up to.
So all the time she was an honest pillar of the community she was defrauding the benefit system, brilliant! Addicted to slot machines and admitted that if she declared the change in circumstances she would lose her benefits - so she didn't bury her head in the sand she put two fingers up to the system.

Hack says...
7:50pm Thu 11 Oct 12

New tack - are judges and magistrates a soft touch for 'bleeding heart' defence solicitors? Or are mags and judges sympathetic to a 'victim' defendant defence? 'My problems were so heavy, I had no choice', but ...Magistrates may be naeve, but professional judges, how so? What, or is there, a balance?

annadean says...
4:33pm Fri 12 Oct 12

this woman really annoys me still claiming even tho her husband is back how much money does she need to live on? there are people out there who have no choice but to live on the minimum wage or basic social and are just getting by she is just greedy to say the least the more she has the more she wants. and as for the part where it says she is disabled and relies on her husband to do all the cleaning as she walks with 2 sticks what a load of old crock because how is she able to go and see her mother and give her support if she is apparently in that much pain and manage to stand there playing slot machines. i have fibromyalgia myself and i am in a lot of pain some days i dont feel like getting out of bed because of the pain let alone give support to someone else. i just feel that all this is a sham so she wouldnt be sentenced i say if you do the crime do the time

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree