Worcester's history at risk (From Worcester News)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting WN NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
Worcester's history at risk
9:53am Monday 15th October 2012 in News By Tom Edwards
THESE are some of Worcester’s historic landmarks which are officially in danger of crumbling away.
A total of 29 public buildings, chapels, former pubs, private properties, conservation areas and other assets feature on an ‘at risk’ register published by Worcester City Council.
Some of them remain in serious condition because of decades of neglect, with the council warning many are in a parlous state.
It includes 18 grade two- listed sites, including the railway bridge at Foregate Street railway station, St Cuthbert’s Chapel, and the old engine works in Shrub Hill Road.
One of the biggest landmarks on the register is the old railway viaduct which snakes along Sansome Road and The Butts, which is looking increasingly tatty and “detracts from the conservation area”.
It also mentions two curry houses in The Tything: Ash-ley’s and Anarkali, where the second floors are both empty and in a “poor state of repair”, according to repair, according to the report.
Also the empty Scala Theatre in Angel Street is in a “poor state of repair internally” and needs urgent “remedial action”.
The list is published once a year and is aimed at keeping tabs on Worcester’s most neglected builings. The register had 22 sites on it last year, meaning it has grown by seven, but by 2013 several are expected to come off the list because of current renovation work.
That includes Heron Lodge, St Cuthbert’s Chapel and Woodside in Lark Hill, where repair works are due to finish in January.
A report spelling out the publication of the register says all the sites will “continue to be monitored” and if negotiation over upgrading them fails, “enforcement action” will be taken.
Councillor Alan Amos, who sits on Worcester City Council’s planning committee, said: “The council does need to take a tough line on the owners of these properties to make sure they are improved.
“It needs to use whatever means it can, because these sites deserve nothing less.”
Councillor David Wilkinson, the city’s appointed heritage champion, said: “Ideally this list would go down until there’s nothing on it, but that’s not the real world.
"When it comes to the numbers, when we want to keep tabs on any damaged building the best thing to do is put it on the register so our attention remains on that site until we are satisfied.”
Buildings at risk
- Shrub Hill Station, the ladies waiting room
- Remains of City Wall
- Lock Cottage, Diglis Dock
- Foregate Street Station railway bridge
- 42 Henwick Road, St John’s
- 34 Henwick Road, St John’s
- 55-57 Lowesmoor
- St Cuthbert’s Chapel
- Shrub Hill Railway Station
- Engine works, Shrub Hill Road
- 18 and 20 Silver Street
- 13 The Tything
- 28 The Tything
- Heron Lodge, London Road
- Woodside, Larkhill
- 11 The Tything
- 47 The Tything
- 115 Sidbury
- 11 Green Hill
- The Granary, St Martin’s Gate
- Railway Viaduct
- 79-81 St John’s
- Scala Theatre, Angel Place
- Ice Factory, Bromyard Road
- Battle of Worcester battlefield, Powick Bridge
- Worcester and Birmingham Canal Conservation Area
- Lowesmoor Conservation Area
- Larkhill Conservation Area
Comments(12)
mr_wilson15
says...
2:24pm Mon 15 Oct 12
CityBlueBoy wrote:well they're off to bigger and better places, and the developers are moving in. So there's no love lost there.
What about the football club, thats crumbling away also, maybe not quite along the same lines but its an historic place in Worcester City !
DarrenM
says...
3:20pm Mon 15 Oct 12
More Tea Vicar
says...
3:34pm Mon 15 Oct 12
Bit hypocritical for them to claim to be concerned about heritage.
Newspaper reader1982
says...
10:23pm Mon 15 Oct 12
This list does seem pretty long here's hoping it is shorter next year like stated!
sugarlump
says...
9:19am Tue 16 Oct 12
More Tea Vicar
says...
10:14am Tue 16 Oct 12
sugarlump wrote:There is a general problem with UK cities. They are all dominated by major chains, meaning that they are largely identikit hosts for M+S, WH Smiths, Boots, H+M etc.
for a historic city Worcester is a mess and it has lost its sense of history. Just walk around York, Chester, Hereford, Chischester, Canterbury etc and feel the difference. Problem is the City is dominated by developers (and a University) who are intent in destroying our history.
And then there are the Costanerobucks coffee shops, and the Pizza Express/Carluccio/St
rada/Ask type places where you get served pseudo-Italian food mainly by east Europeans.
I actually like much of the renewal of the centre of Worcester, but I do resent the chains, and the university, both of which seem to be rather changing the place to their own advantage.
Red Baron
says...
10:56am Tue 16 Oct 12
Was any resource set aside by the city council to ensure that those at risk buildings were preserved or conserved for the future - No.
I suspect the report was completed and filed away to comply with some legal requirement.
I have lived in Worcester for over 40 years and to me the city has never been proud of its heritage in all that time.
Elgar's house was demolished to make way for maisonettes; the Lych Gate was allowed to decay until it neede pulling down; and so on.
I agree with the other comment made about cities like Chester and York - they generate tourism and therefore revenue by preserving what they have got and restoring it as necessary.
Both cities are cathedral cities with city walls around them and rivers that flow through them. You can walk around Chester along its entire wall and 2/3 of the way around York; you can park in Park and Ride schemes that are real value for money and enjoy a day in the city without worrying if you are going to have to raise a second mortgage to park there.
Some of the properties mentioned on the list have been partially or fully restored by their owners.
What does Worcester do?
Wait until it is far too late to preserve anything and then knock it down.
I recall standing on Powick Bridge with one of the County Councillors and some kindred spirits lobbying about the poor state of repair of this historic bridge. Was anything done to preserve it - a dash of mortar to replace some coping stones and that was it.
Come on Worcester!
Get behind your history and your heritage and do not expect others to spend the money on your behalf.
Put up some real money for preserving what is already here and make the city a real attraction for tourists.
Get the local historians involved - they probably would welcome the opportunity.
I disagree about the developers and University ruining our city. The Royal Infirmary site is now preserved and not derelict. The "Hive" is both innovative and an amenity to the city. Crowngate is far better than the old Greyfriars concrete. Newport Street is better as it is today then the Bus Station it once was. The Shrub Hill area looks a great deal better than the slums and cinder car parks that used to be there.
Food for throught I am sure.
sugarlump
says...
12:01pm Tue 16 Oct 12
purplecat17
says...
1:51pm Thu 18 Oct 12
wr5resident2
says...
12:39pm Fri 19 Oct 12
mayall8808
says...
8:35pm Fri 19 Oct 12
CityBlueBoy says...
1:14pm Mon 15 Oct 12