Slow broadband means I may have to move firm

A WORCESTERSHIRE businessman may have to move his company due to the poor quality of broadband in his village.

Tim Walton, of Newtown, Offenham, near Evesham, had been hoping he would get superfast broadband as part a nationwide rollout by BT.

But the scheme only applies to two thirds of the country and despite fibre optic wires being laid to two cabinets supplying the faster broadband in Offenham, only one has been connected to the mains power – leaving half the village with a bad connection.

“About two years ago we were told we would be able to get BT Infinity in Offenham,” said Mr Walton, who runs Evesham Solutions from his home.

“For them not to finish the last tiny part of the job is very frustrating.

“We are stuck with an unreliable 1Mbps connection and if somebody rings the house, it dips out. “I have an IT business, if I can’t get this sorted out I will have to get an office elsewhere. It really is having a big impact on the business.”

A spokesperson for BT said: “Additional installation costs and technical challenges mean that we can’t currently include this cabinet in our superfast rollout plans.”

The final third of the country not included in BT’s rollout plan is now relying on national and local government funding to improve the connection.

As your Worcester News reported last week, Worcestershire County Council is hoping it can start work on its broadband improvement plan next year.

The council has already earmarked £8.5 million for faster web speeds and has secured £3.3 million from Broadband Delivery UK (BDUK), a Government body, to add to the kitty.

BDUK is expected to get approval from the EU by the start of November to spend its cash. The plan aims to provide access to superfast broadband – which is defined as more than 24Mbps – to 90 percent of businesses and residents in the county by 2015, with everyone else having access to at least 2Mbps.

Coun Simon Geraghty, member for economy and infrastructure, said: “We know faster and more reliable broadband is important to local people but it is crucial to local businesses.

“It is still too early to say exactly when Broadband speeds will be increased in specific areas, but there is still the chance to register demand.”

Visit worcestershire.gov. uk/broadband to register demand or visit your local library, where hard copies are available.

Comments(14)

justmycomments says...
12:51am Sun 21 Oct 12

http://www.broadband
wherever.net/home.as
px?gclid=CPS84cvkkLM
CFQzKtAodmwUA_A

£25 a month, works everywhere. Seriously is this news ?

Grumbleweed Connection says...
9:06am Sun 21 Oct 12

Mobile broadband may be the solution, if coverage extends to the area. My rural landline produced broadband speeds which were equivalent to dial up. A '3' Dongle maintains speeds of 5Mbps to 6Mbps, costing less than 20GBP per month for a 15GB monthly data allowance. Such speeds are adequate for most applications, and provide a satisfactory alternative to BT's unfulfilled promises.

brooksider says...
9:40am Sun 21 Oct 12

justmycomments wrote:
http://www.broadband

wherever.net/home.as

px?gclid=CPS84cvkkLM

CFQzKtAodmwUA_A

£25 a month, works everywhere. Seriously is this news ?
And he is in IT!

imustbeoldiwearacap says...
9:58am Sun 21 Oct 12

Where I live in Worcester City we have been promised Infinity - 31 March 2012: 30 June 2012: 30 September 2012: 31 December 2012 - I am NOT holding my breath! I expect the same in 2013!

dplumb says...
10:05am Sun 21 Oct 12

Trouble is, BT are cherry picking areas to upgrade which funnily enough seems to be areas that already have an alternative cable provider. If it doesn't fit their standard rollout plan, they move on, safe in the knowledge that the taxpayer will be following behind them to finish the job and hand the kit over to BT.

Satellite and 3G are ok, but have fair usage and outgoing only restrictions that wouldn't suit businesses. They are also finite in resources whereas cable/DSL can be cheaply upgraded to cope with higher usage.

BT know exactly what they're doing, it's such a shame the government were conned into helping them out (again).

Malaky says...
10:23am Sun 21 Oct 12

The provision of Broadband is just as important now as the provision of roads, water, sewage, education and libraries and should be regarded as a prime responsibility of councils.

We left the 1900's 12 years ago!

Andy_R says...
11:23am Sun 21 Oct 12

Is Coun Simon Geraghty really telling us he knows better broadband is crucial, he's got an £11.8 million pounds budget to do something about it, but he hasn't actually bothered spending any of that money on speeding things up... and worse than that, he can't even be bothered telling us when he's going to start?

Guy66 says...
5:50pm Sun 21 Oct 12

dplumb wrote:
Trouble is, BT are cherry picking areas to upgrade which funnily enough seems to be areas that already have an alternative cable provider. If it doesn't fit their standard rollout plan, they move on, safe in the knowledge that the taxpayer will be following behind them to finish the job and hand the kit over to BT.

Satellite and 3G are ok, but have fair usage and outgoing only restrictions that wouldn't suit businesses. They are also finite in resources whereas cable/DSL can be cheaply upgraded to cope with higher usage.

BT know exactly what they're doing, it's such a shame the government were conned into helping them out (again).
I doubt your statement - we're in an Infinity enabled area with NO cable alternative or any other faster service alternative. BT are basing the installations based on potential uptake and their ROI.

Guy66 says...
5:51pm Sun 21 Oct 12

Malaky wrote:
The provision of Broadband is just as important now as the provision of roads, water, sewage, education and libraries and should be regarded as a prime responsibility of councils.

We left the 1900's 12 years ago!
We left the 20th century 12yrs ago, this is now the 21st century - tut tut!

Guy66 says...
5:52pm Sun 21 Oct 12

brooksider wrote:
justmycomments wrote:
http://www.broadband


wherever.net/home.as


px?gclid=CPS84cvkkLM


CFQzKtAodmwUA_A

£25 a month, works everywhere. Seriously is this news ?
And he is in IT!
IT is a very large area these days - just being in IT does not make you an expert in data telecommunications.

brooksider says...
9:18pm Sun 21 Oct 12

Guy66 wrote:
brooksider wrote:
justmycomments wrote:
http://www.broadband



wherever.net/home.as



px?gclid=CPS84cvkkLM



CFQzKtAodmwUA_A

£25 a month, works everywhere. Seriously is this news ?
And he is in IT!
IT is a very large area these days - just being in IT does not make you an expert in data telecommunications.
Don't have to be to Google
'Satellite Broadband' especially when your business depends on it.

However I do understand his frustration when BT have installed the fibres to a cabinet but wont power it because it is "not financially viable".

A pathetic excuse and typical of a company operating a monopoly.

Tim Walton should be getting his MP, Peter Luff, and Worcestershire's chocolate teapot, Simon Geraghty to put pressure on BT.

batchelorboy says...
9:52pm Sun 21 Oct 12

Guy66 wrote:
brooksider wrote:
justmycomments wrote:
http://www.broadband



wherever.net/home.as



px?gclid=CPS84cvkkLM



CFQzKtAodmwUA_A

£25 a month, works everywhere. Seriously is this news ?
And he is in IT!
IT is a very large area these days - just being in IT does not make you an expert in data telecommunications.
Very true but anyone businessman would check broadband speed before moving to an area where he would later rely on broadband speeds...

Leeolitina says...
8:45am Mon 22 Oct 12

batchelorboy wrote:
Guy66 wrote:
brooksider wrote:
justmycomments wrote:
http://www.broadband




wherever.net/home.as




px?gclid=CPS84cvkkLM




CFQzKtAodmwUA_A

£25 a month, works everywhere. Seriously is this news ?
And he is in IT!
IT is a very large area these days - just being in IT does not make you an expert in data telecommunications.
Very true but anyone businessman would check broadband speed before moving to an area where he would later rely on broadband speeds...
The link everyone has pointed to is fine for most things - but if he is running an IT business then there is a good chance he will need VPN or something similar which you cannot run on the cheap connections they offer. You are looking at £99 per month at least so not cheap. The point he is trying to make is that BT have actually done all the work - they are just not turning on the cabinet and swapping people over. A similar issue to here on the Enigma Business Park in Malvern. BT will only turn on a cabinet if there are enough businesses or users connected to the cabinet to make lots of £££. If there isn't they won't turn it on.

grcscyband says...
10:42am Fri 26 Oct 12

After recently leaving the Royal Signals, I looked at various jobs staying within the telecommunications industry.

I came across a company which installs Satellite broadband. They had a vacancy as an Installation Engineer. I applied for the job and was successful. I have now been working for this company for 6 weeks and have installed satellite broadband across the 3 counties and Wales. The only feedback which I have received has been positive.

Although 4g is 'readily available' I believe to reach many people it may take as long as 3 years.

So, in short I would actively promote the usage of satellite broadband, an uncontested link, with proven speeds and quick and easy to install.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree