Meeting called on controversial plans (From Worcester News)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting WN NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
Meeting called on controversial plans
7:30am Saturday 20th October 2012 in News By Tarik Al Rasheed
An artist’s impression of how the centre of the development proposed for Malvern could look.
WORCESTERSHIRE councillors have demanded an extraordinary meeting to debate a new report that could consign controversial plans for an 800-home development in Malvern to the scrapheap.
Since July, a cross-party policy group of Malvern Hills District councillors has been examining alternatives to the current housing allocations in the emerging South Worcestershire Development Plan (SWDP).
The group’s report has now been completed and presented to councillors – although its contents remain closely guarded from members of the public.
However, it is understood that it calls for an unpopular urban extension of 700 homes at Newland to be slashed to 250 properties, with the remainder being re-allocated to other sites in South Worcestershire.
The site is already being eyed up by developers and Gleeson Strategic Land has produced detailed plans of its vision for the land.
On Wednesday, a demand for an extraordinary meeting to consider the contents of the report and decide whether to put them out to public consultation was approved by the council. A public meeting will now take place on a date to be fixed.
Councillor Tom Wells, leader of the opposition, said the call for an extraordinary meeting had found support among members of all political parties.
“This is an unprecedented step but it demonstrates the seriousness and importance of the subject,” he said.
He said he could not comment on any of the details of the report, but was keen for it to be placed into the public domain as soon as possible.
“I am hoping we will establish a way forward in recognising and accepting the report,” he said. “If that means further, targeted public consultation, then we need to get on quickly.”
Another councillor, who asked to remain anonymous, said it was outrageous the contents of the report were being kept a secret and that such extreme measures were required to have them debated as a matter of urgency.
A further public consultation would delay the current timetable for the SWDP.
As things stand, it will be debated by the district council and Wychavon and Worcester City councils at meetings on Tuesday, November 27, and – subject to approval – sent for government inspection and a likely adoption in late 2013.
Comments(3)
More Tea Vicar
says...
12:24pm Sat 20 Oct 12
So long as it doesn't mean the same number of houses will be inflicted on other areas of the county.
I think local politicians need to take time off from threatening to dig up corpses, and filling in their expenses.
They need to realise that mass housing development is bad for the area, and it needs to be made bad for them, too.
They need to know they can lose votes.
And planning officers need to know they can lose their jobs.
Allan Whitehead
says...
2:05pm Sat 20 Oct 12
However, infill sites are not popular with developers (insufficient Profit)
because it places to many safety regulations upon them. Central government should make funds available to make infill sites more appealing to developers, rather than allowing them to build house on greenfield sites, or site the Local Council consider being un suitable.
Andy-Apache
says...
7:53am Tue 23 Oct 12
Doesn't change the fact that this is greenbelt, and no-one has actually come up with firm proof that the houses are necessary - other than to boost the building trade in a slow recovering economy.
Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Log in with us
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Or
Log in with