9:30am Monday 6th October 2008
SIR – H A Kendall’s story is very sad (September 29) and he is honest and brave for speaking out.
Obviously, we must accept that diligence is due whenever we consider adults with responsibilities over children, and anyone taking advantage of any vulnerable person is to be abhorred.
But due diligence has been greatly over-inflated if a widower cannot sit in a park without receiving accusing looks. If the parents Mr Kendall mentions cannot imagine any reason beside sexual predation for why an old man might want to sit in a park, then their imaginations have been horribly warped. There is a climate of fear which affects not just old men in parks, but younger men, teachers, passers-by, even relatives of young people.
On a train last week a girl of about five started talking to me. I think the presence of my Nintendo DS broke down the social barrier!
Perhaps some of the looks we received across the carriage were, in part, due to surprise that two strangers should hold an open conversation on the tube at all, let alone an adult male returning polite enquiries from a child who is unknown to him. But that doesn’t fully explain the prolonged glares and my own absurd, fleeting sensations of danger.
Parents should worry about their children, yes.
Concern is understandable, yes, especially in a climate where sexual predation and sexual abuse are discussed more openly. But people should realise that, in a sense, nothing sexualises children more than if we are constantly thinking of them as the potential victims of sexual predation.
BOB CHURCHILL, Worcester
© Copyright 2001-2012 Newsquest Media Group
http://www.worcesternews.co.uk