Read RSS Feed


Time for minority to accept the Act

SIR – In response to Jon Burgess’ letter (April 27) ‘Repeal of the Act needed immediately’, I think it is worth pointing out that the League Against Cruel Sports’ decision to discontinue with our prosecution against huntsmen from the Isle of Wight does not indicate a flaw in the Hunting Act but was in fact a decision which was taken after much legal deliberation.

The decision to drop this particular case was taken because although the evidence had originally been of sufficient quality and quantity, this was no longer the case following the recent High Court judgment. The ruling introduced a new criteria in presenting evidence which did not exist when this particular case was brought. The league felt that it would be wrong to pursue a prosecution where the defendants would be disadvantaged by the new criteria.

The Hunting Act is not a failure but a robust piece of legislation – it’s time the minority who enjoy chasing and killing animals for sport accepted this.

DOUGLAS BATCHELOR,
Chief executive, League Against Cruel Sports.

Comments(2)

Southern Badger says...
11:31pm Wed 6 May 09

Sooo - the LACS dropped their prosecution of the Isle of Wight hunt staff because it felt it would be unfair to the defendants.... now that really is twisted logic.

AR2048 says...
3:50am Thu 7 May 09

Foxhunting is the worst of human nature - a pack of bloodthirsty humans with a pack of dogs versus one old or weak or injured (so the pro-hunt claim)fox.

The majority of people very much welcome the Hunting Act as long-overdue, much needed moral progress.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree