Read RSS Feed


Hounds never leave a wounded fox

SIR – Tony Jones (Worcester News, June 10) recommends shooting foxes in the head with a small calibre rimfire rifle to control their numbers.

This sounds an easy solution but be slightly off target and the result may be a smashed jaw followed by weeks of suffering and death by starvation.

It would appear Mr Jones has no knowledge of the firearms he recommends or the horrendous consequences regarding animal welfare should they be used incorrectly.

It’s worth repeating that hounds never leave a wounded fox.

The claim by Mr Jones that the fox is ripped apart alive is untrue because the fox is already dead, killed by the first one or two hounds.

This fact is made crystal clear by the RSPCA, League Against Cruel Sports and International Fund for Animal Welfare.

Their joint website on the Hunting Act (2004) says the following: “If the hounds were successful in their pursuit they would catch it, kill it and tear it apart.”

None of the usual ‘torn to shreds alive’ propaganda, just the plain simple truth for once and from the antihunting fraternity no less.

JON BURGESS
Worcester

Comments(1)

BUSHMANWATCHING says...
11:15am Thu 16 Jun 11

Thei joint website on the Hunting Act (2004), by LACS. RSPCA and IFAW, says the following: “If the hounds were successful in their pursuit they would catch it, kill it and tear it apart.”

If you read the website article in context as well as eye witness accounts of foxes being hunted and killed by hounds then you will understand the fact is that the hounds catch the fox, bring it down and then is pounced on by the whole pack who kill it by literally biting it to death, with the extinction of life coming when a vital organ is ripped from the body of the fox, usually the stomach and intestines. Fact is that if one was serious about controlling foxes with a dog then they would use a lurcher or greyhound, which would be on the fox very quick, although the ending would be as cruel and painfull as a hound killing a fox. Hunts have chosen the fox hound for its staminar, because their fun comes with a long chase and so what would be the point in chasing and catching a fox so quick? The hunt members on horse back would certainly not approve of a short chase, which they have paid good money for.

However, this is really a side issue as foxes cause no problem in the countryside and I have waited for years to see evidense of the "evil" foxes do. 99.9% of poultry are factory reared and so are in secure locked sheds, DEFRA says that predation on sheep and lambs by foxes are insignificant and the main reason for deaths to sheep and lambs is due to poor animal husbandry.

You will notice that anybody who dislikes foxes and attempts to demonise them at every opportunity are those who profit from blood sports or who have a perverse joy in killing foxes and game birds and/or make good money from such practises.

There will always be people who have a disturbing passion to kill innocent animals, but don't ever be fooled by their properganda machine which churnes out tales of the demaon fox and that killing birds for pleasure also has a benefit to our environment.

Oh, and let us not forget the hundreds of tons of highly toxic lead that is scattered throughout our British countryside every year from the cartridges of men and women who claim to be the custodians of our green and pleasant land.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree