We seem to be learning nothing from history

SIR – The coalition Government has learned nothing from the depression of the 1930s.

Austerity didn’t work then and it is not working now.

The Bank of England has increased the money supply (quantitative easing) by £300 billion since 2009 and we are still in recession.

There are much greater cuts to come than have been made hitherto.

Now the Bank of England is offering £80 billion of ‘cheap’ loans to the banks in the expectation that they will lend to businesses at lower rates.

This £380 billion should have been given to the public sector so that government and councils could place orders with the private sector for infrastructure work, and to raise the standard of education in state schools by bringing down the pupil-teacher ratio.

That would put people to work instead of persisting with the nonsense of austerity and mass unemployment.

Channelling new money supply through the banks hoping that it will be borrowed and boost business and create confidence by buying government bonds has failed.

The banks should wait until the money has passed through the hands of wage earners before being deposited with them.

That’s how banking used to work successfully before the bankers plunged their snouts into the trough where they remain today, courtesy of New Labour and the Lib/Tory coalition government.

PETER NIELSEN
Worcester

Comments(3)

MrStJohns says...
12:43pm Wed 20 Jun 12

Britain wasn’t really in depression in the 1930’s by 1933-34 we had economic growth of 3-4%, America was in depression in the 1930s.

Your anti government rants would be taken more seriously if your facts were in anyway viable.

anarchist says...
12:19pm Thu 21 Jun 12

I share your disdain for the decision to print money and give it to the banks (or _anyone_ in my view).

But I do so for entirely different reasons to those which you give.

Printing money reduces its value so those who have run up debts benefit from the move because their debts are reduced in value and they hence owe less as a result.

In contrast, those who have been careful to live within their means and even save to ensure their future well-being have the value of their savings seriously undermined.

So both this government and New Labour have both acted to support those who have taken on unsustainable debt whilst penalising those who have acted prudently.

At least you are honest in admitting that you would fund government spending by taxing the rich.

Those governments who print money to fund their spending are dishonestly and silently robbing their prudent citizens in order to continue with their profligate spending and their support for those who got us into this problem in the first place by encouraging economic activity based on unsustainable debt.

PeterNielsen says...
3:21pm Mon 25 Jun 12

MrStJohns wrote:
Britain wasn’t really in depression in the 1930’s by 1933-34 we had economic growth of 3-4%, America was in depression in the 1930s. Your anti government rants would be taken more seriously if your facts were in anyway viable.
It is not a rant. I am stating a point of view. When I receive a pejorative response, I generally take it that I am getting through. Sir, it does not become you to throw brickbats from behind a veil of anonomity. I will gladly argue a case with an anonymous contributor. In response to your point about economic growth in the 1930s, I would reply that the success of an economy should be judged by the condition of the people, and not by statistics that obscure the reality on the ground for workers in the 1930s.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree